IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/13789_47.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Performing Arts

In: A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Towse

Abstract

The second edition of this widely acclaimed and extensively cited collection of original contributions by specialist authors reflects changes in the field of cultural economics over the last eight years. Thoroughly revised chapters alongside new topics and contributors bring the Handbook up to date, taking into account new research, literature and the impact of new technologies in the creative industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Towse, 2011. "Performing Arts," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 47, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:13789_47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781848448872.00053.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Towse,Ruth, 2010. "A Textbook of Cultural Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521888721, June.
    2. Towse,Ruth, 2010. "A Textbook of Cultural Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521717021, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Victor Fernandez-Blanco & Juan Prieto-Rodriguez & Javier Suarez-Pandiello, 2015. "A quantitative analysis of reading habits," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-05-2015, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised May 2015.
    2. Janowska, Anna Anetta & Malik, Radosław, 2020. "Digitization in museums: Between a fashionable trend and market awareness," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 7(3), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Luigi Di Gaetano & Isidoro Mazza, 2017. "“Better an egg today than a hen tomorrow” on the implications of deaccess policies for donations to museums," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(3), pages 237-258, August.
    4. Weber, Cameron & Zhen, Ying & Arias, JJ, 2022. "Practice, Entrepreneurship and Subjectivity in Artist Identification with Applications to the Covid-Era," MPRA Paper 115712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Andrej Srakar, 2017. "Prevalence of Diseases and Health Care Utilization ofthe Self-Employed Artists and TheirEmpirical Determinants: Evidence From a Slovenian Survey," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-08-2017, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised Sep 2017.
    6. Jasmin Droege, 2022. "First impression biases in the performing arts: taste-based discrimination and the value of blind auditioning," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(3), pages 391-437, September.
    7. Gabriel Ahlfeldt & Kristoffer Möller & Sevrin Waights & Nicolai Wendland, 2012. "On prisoner's dilemmas and gilded cages: The economics of heritage preservation," ERSA conference papers ersa12p783, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Alexander Cuntz, 2018. "Creators' Income Situation in the Digital Age," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 49, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    9. Barile, Sergio & Montella, Massimo & Saviano, Marialuisa, 2012. "A service-based systems view of cultural heritage," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 5(2), pages 106-136.
    10. Karol Jan Borowiecki & Trilce Navarrete, 2018. "Fiscal and economic aspects of book consumption in the European Union," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(2), pages 309-339, May.
    11. Christian Barrère & Sophie Delabruyère, 2011. "Intellectual property rights on creativity and heritage: the case of the fashion industry," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 305-339, December.
    12. Milton Marquis, 2013. "Bringing Culture to Macroeconomics," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 41(3), pages 301-315, September.
    13. Gustavo Fernandes Souza & Ana Flávia Machado & Edson Paulo Domingues, 2019. "Economic impacts of the vale-cultura (culture voucher): a computable general equilibrium model," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 595, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    14. Manfred J. Holler & Isidoro Mazza, 2013. "Cultural heritage: public decision-making and implementation," Chapters, in: Ilde Rizzo & Anna Mignosa (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, chapter 2, pages i-i, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Aleksandra Wiśniewska & Wiktor Budziński & Mikołaj Czajkowski, 2020. "An economic valuation of access to cultural institutions: museums, theatres, and cinemas," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(4), pages 563-587, December.
    16. Bruce Seaman, 2017. "¿Qué está en juego al optar entre distintas formas de apoyo para el sector cultural?," Estudios Públicos, Centro de Estudios Públicos, vol. 0(146), pages 121-162.
    17. Aleksandra Wiśniewska & Wiktor Budziński & Mikołaj Czajkowski, 2018. "Publicly funded cultural institutions – a comparative economic valuation study," Working Papers 2018-22, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    18. Jose A Bermudez Trivino & Lina M Medina Hurtado & Luis Fernando Aguado Quintero, 2015. "Analyzing the decision to listen to recorded music. A microeconometric approach," Working Papers 3, Faculty of Economics and Management, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali.
    19. Gillian Doyle, 2010. "Why culture attracts and resists economic analysis," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 34(4), pages 245-259, November.
    20. Bermúdez Triviño, José A. & Medina Hurtado, Lina M. & Aguado Quintero, Luis F., 2016. "La decisión de escuchar música grabada en Colombia. Un enfoque microeconométrico || The decision of listening to recorded music in Colombia. A microeconometric approach," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 21(1), pages 21-38, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economics and Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:13789_47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.