IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zna/indecs/v19y2021i3p366-374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing risk and resilience approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Leon Runje

    (Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Croatia Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Amalija Horvatic Novak

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Biserka Runje

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Andrej Razumic

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Veljko Kondic

    (University North, Varaždin, Croatia)

Abstract

Ever increasing challenges in the areas of risk management have led to a need for a risk management approach which deals not only with threat prevention but also adaption, absorption and recovery from adverse events. This has led to the rise of the concept of resilience analysis and management, which, unlike risk assessment and management focuses on the overall system under analysis rather than its individual components. Therefore, both the civilian and military sector have, over the past decade, emphasized the need to clarify the concept of resilience management as well as to differentiate it from related terms such as risk management. This article aims to build upon the existing literature and provide a comparison of the risk and resilience approaches which offer ways to analyse and manage these concepts.

Suggested Citation

  • Leon Runje & Amalija Horvatic Novak & Biserka Runje & Andrej Razumic & Veljko Kondic, 2021. "Comparing risk and resilience approaches," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 19(3), pages 366-374.
  • Handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:19:y:2021:i:3:p:366-374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.indecs.eu/2021/indecs2021-pp366-374.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk assessment; risk management; resilience analysis; resilience management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:19:y:2021:i:3:p:366-374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Josip Stepanic (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.