IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbtrab/v2y2021i1p10-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Potency Of Bio-Rational Insecticides Based Ipm Approaches Against Tomato Leaf Miner (Tuta Absoluta, Meyrick) Under Field Condition

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Jewel Alam

    (Department of Entomology, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh)

  • Kazi Md. Abu Sayeed

    (Arboriculture PWD Subdivision, Bangladesh National Parliament, Sere Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Aminul Islam

    (Department of Horticulture, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Yousuf

    (Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh)

Abstract

Tuta absoluta (Meyrick), the tomato leaf miner, is one of the most key pests affecting tomato crops in Bangladesh and causes damage up to 90% yield loss, and very difficult to control. An open field research was conducted in the Arboriculture Centre, Bangladesh National Parliament, Sere Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, Bangladesh during December 2017 to April 2018 on the management of tomato leaf miner using ten selected bio-rational insecticide based IPM packages viz. Emamectin benzoate + removal of instead leaf & fruit, spinosad + removal of infested leaf & fruit, abamectin + removal of infested leaf & fruit, emamectin benzoate + abamectin, spinosad + buprofezin, abamectin + buprofezin, emamectin benzoate + lufenuron, buprofezin + removal of infested leaf & fruit, buprofezin + lufenuron and lufenuron + removal of infested leaf & fruit along with an untreated control. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (BCBD) with three replications of each treatment. The effectiveness of IPM packages was evaluated based on following parameters namely percent leaf and fruit infestation, percent protection of leaf and fruit over control, marketable and infested fruit yield (t/ha), percent increase or decrease of marketable or infested fruit over control. All the IPM packages significantly reduced percent leaf and fruit infestation and significantly increased/decreased the marketable/infested fruit yield, respectively over untreated control at 7 days after spraying (DAS). Of different packages, the best results were observed in case of emamectin benzoate + removal of infested leaf & fruit (84.83% and 86.54% leaf and fruit, respectively protection over control; marketable fruit yield of 46.60 t/ha and 71.67% reduction of infested fruit yield over control) treated plot whereas the lowest protection was obtained from lufenuron + removal of infested leaf & fruit (34.95% and 37.33% leaf and fruit, respectively over control; marketable fruit yield of 26.49 t/ha and 11.36% reduction of infested fruit yield over control) treated plots. Therefore, emamectin benzoate + removal of infested leaf & fruit could be recommended as the IPM packages for the sustainable management of tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Jewel Alam & Kazi Md. Abu Sayeed & Md. Aminul Islam & Md. Yousuf, 2021. "Comparative Potency Of Bio-Rational Insecticides Based Ipm Approaches Against Tomato Leaf Miner (Tuta Absoluta, Meyrick) Under Field Condition," Tropical Agrobiodiversity (TRAB), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 10-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbtrab:v:2:y:2021:i:1:p:10-15
    DOI: 10.26480/trab.01.2021.10.15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://trab.org.my/download/1584
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/trab.01.2021.10.15?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbtrab:v:2:y:2021:i:1:p:10-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://trab.org.my/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.