IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbtrab/v1y2020i2p77-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Efficacy of Some Newer Insecticides Against Rice Leaf Folder (Cnaphalocrosis Medinalis Guen.) And Their Effects on Natural Enemies in Rice Ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjida Shaki

    (Department of Entomology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Niaz Morshed

    (Adaptive Research Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI), Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh)

  • Naznin Sultana

    (Department of Entomology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh)

  • Gopal Das

    (Department of Entomology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh.)

Abstract

In the present study, some new generation insecticides were evaluated against rice leaf folder (RFL) infestation and their toxic effects were also observed on some natural enemies in the rice ecosystem. Data were collected on percent hill infestation, percent leaf infestation, number of moths/sweep, grain yield (t/ha) and abundances of natural enemies/m2. Results clearly showed that Serput (Bifenthrin) 2.5EC @ 2.0 ml/L water resulted in the greatest reduction of RFL and increased the grain yield compared to the untreated control which was followed by Envoy (Fipronil) 50SC @ 1.0 ml/L, Libsen (Spinosad) 45SC @ 0.40 ml/L, Acemida (Acephate + Imidacloprid) 51.8WDG @ 1.0 g/L, Suspend (Emamectin benzoate) 5SG @ 1.0 g/L, Combi-DT (Deltamethrin + Triazophos) 36EC @ 0.50 ml/L and Altima plus (Thiamethoxam + Emamectin benzoate) 40WG @ 0.20 g/L respectively. To know the toxic effect of selected insecticides, abundances (number/m2) of some natural enemies were counted at 7 days after given each spray. It was found that the highest numbers of natural enemies (m2) were recorded in the untreated control plot. In all field trials, the harmful effects of the seven insecticides were in the following rank order (least harmful to most harmful): Suspend 5SG, Serput 2.5EC, Envoy 50SC, Libsen 45SC, Acemida 51.8WDG, Altima plus 40WG and Combi-DT 36EC. Based on the reduction in rice leaf folder infestation, increase in grain yield and compatibility with natural enemies, Serput 2.5EC @ 2.0 ml/L proved to be the best among all the selected insecticides.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjida Shaki & Md. Niaz Morshed & Naznin Sultana & Gopal Das, 2020. "Comparative Efficacy of Some Newer Insecticides Against Rice Leaf Folder (Cnaphalocrosis Medinalis Guen.) And Their Effects on Natural Enemies in Rice Ecosystem," Tropical Agrobiodiversity (TRAB), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 77-81, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbtrab:v:1:y:2020:i:2:p:77-81
    DOI: 10.26480/trab.02.2020.77.81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://trab.org.my/download/1398/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/trab.02.2020.77.81?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbtrab:v:1:y:2020:i:2:p:77-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://trab.org.my/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.