IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v66y2019i3p230-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shortest path interdiction problem with arc improvement recourse: A multiobjective approach

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Holzmann
  • J. Cole Smith

Abstract

We consider the shortest path interdiction problem involving two agents, a leader and a follower, playing a Stackelberg game. The leader seeks to maximize the follower's minimum costs by interdicting certain arcs, thus increasing the travel time of those arcs. The follower may improve the network after the interdiction by lowering the costs of some arcs, subject to a cardinality budget restriction on arc improvements. The leader and the follower are both aware of all problem data, with the exception that the leader is unaware of the follower's improvement budget. The effectiveness of an interdiction action is given by the length of a shortest path after arc costs are adjusted by both the interdiction and improvement. We propose a multiobjective optimization model for this problem, with each objective corresponding to a different possible improvement budget value. We provide mathematical optimization techniques to generate a complete set of strategies that are Pareto‐optimal. Additionally, for the special case of series‐parallel graphs, we provide a dynamic‐programming algorithm for generating all Pareto‐optimal solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Holzmann & J. Cole Smith, 2019. "Shortest path interdiction problem with arc improvement recourse: A multiobjective approach," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(3), pages 230-252, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:66:y:2019:i:3:p:230-252
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21839
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21839?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrice Perny & Olivier Spanjaard & Louis-Xavier Storme, 2006. "A decision-theoretic approach to robust optimization in multivalued graphs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 317-341, October.
    2. Dan A. Iancu & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2014. "Pareto Efficiency in Robust Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 130-147, January.
    3. Clyde L. Monma & Jeffrey B. Sidney, 1979. "Sequencing with Series-Parallel Precedence Constraints," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 215-224, August.
    4. Brian Lunday & Hanif Sherali, 2012. "Network interdiction to minimize the maximum probability of evasion with synergy between applied resources," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 411-442, July.
    5. Hites, R. & De Smet, Y. & Risse, N. & Salazar-Neumann, M. & Vincke, P., 2006. "About the applicability of MCDA to some robustness problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 322-332, October.
    6. Thomas Stidsen & Kim Allan Andersen & Bernd Dammann, 2014. "A Branch and Bound Algorithm for a Class of Biobjective Mixed Integer Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 1009-1032, April.
    7. Dächert, Kerstin & Klamroth, Kathrin & Lacour, Renaud & Vanderpooten, Daniel, 2017. "Efficient computation of the search region in multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 841-855.
    8. Klein, Dieter & Hannan, Edward, 1982. "An algorithm for the multiple objective integer linear programming problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 378-385, April.
    9. Holzmann, Tim & Smith, J.C., 2018. "Solving discrete multi-objective optimization problems using modified augmented weighted Tchebychev scalarizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 436-449.
    10. Konrad, Renata A. & Trapp, Andrew C. & Palmbach, Timothy M. & Blom, Jeffrey S., 2017. "Overcoming human trafficking via operations research and analytics: Opportunities for methods, models, and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 733-745.
    11. Leonardo Lozano & J. Cole Smith, 2017. "A Backward Sampling Framework for Interdiction Problems with Fortification," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 123-139, February.
    12. Klamroth, Kathrin & Köbis, Elisabeth & Schöbel, Anita & Tammer, Christiane, 2017. "A unified approach to uncertain optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 403-420.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kosmas, Daniel & Sharkey, Thomas C. & Mitchell, John E. & Maass, Kayse Lee & Martin, Lauren, 2023. "Interdicting restructuring networks with applications in illicit trafficking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 832-851.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klamroth, Kathrin & Köbis, Elisabeth & Schöbel, Anita & Tammer, Christiane, 2017. "A unified approach to uncertain optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 403-420.
    2. Holzmann, Tim & Smith, J.C., 2018. "Solving discrete multi-objective optimization problems using modified augmented weighted Tchebychev scalarizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 436-449.
    3. Botte, Marco & Schöbel, Anita, 2019. "Dominance for multi-objective robust optimization concepts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 430-440.
    4. Jonas Ide & Anita Schöbel, 2016. "Robustness for uncertain multi-objective optimization: a survey and analysis of different concepts," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 235-271, January.
    5. Kerstin Dächert & Tino Fleuren & Kathrin Klamroth, 2024. "A simple, efficient and versatile objective space algorithm for multiobjective integer programming," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 100(1), pages 351-384, August.
    6. Satya Tamby & Daniel Vanderpooten, 2021. "Enumeration of the Nondominated Set of Multiobjective Discrete Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 72-85, January.
    7. David Bergman & Merve Bodur & Carlos Cardonha & Andre A. Cire, 2022. "Network Models for Multiobjective Discrete Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 990-1005, March.
    8. Ozgu Turgut & Evrim Dalkiran & Alper E. Murat, 2019. "An exact parallel objective space decomposition algorithm for solving multi-objective integer programming problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 35-62, September.
    9. Marie Schmidt & Leo Kroon & Anita Schöbel & Paul Bouman, 2017. "The Travelers Route Choice Problem Under Uncertainty: Dominance Relations Between Strategies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 184-199, February.
    10. Boland, Natashia & Charkhgard, Hadi & Savelsbergh, Martin, 2019. "Preprocessing and cut generation techniques for multi-objective binary programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 858-875.
    11. Nathan Adelgren & Akshay Gupte, 2022. "Branch-and-Bound for Biobjective Mixed-Integer Linear Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 909-933, March.
    12. Tolga Bektaş, 2018. "Disjunctive Programming for Multiobjective Discrete Optimisation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 625-633, November.
    13. Alexander Engau, 2017. "Proper Efficiency and Tradeoffs in Multiple Criteria and Stochastic Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 119-134, January.
    14. Mesquita-Cunha, Mariana & Figueira, José Rui & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula, 2023. "New ϵ−constraint methods for multi-objective integer linear programming: A Pareto front representation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 286-307.
    15. Julius Bauß & Michael Stiglmayr, 2024. "Augmenting bi-objective branch and bound by scalarization-based information," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 100(1), pages 85-121, August.
    16. De Santis, Marianna & Grani, Giorgio & Palagi, Laura, 2020. "Branching with hyperplanes in the criterion space: The frontier partitioner algorithm for biobjective integer programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 57-69.
    17. Andrew J. Keith & Darryl K. Ahner, 2021. "A survey of decision making and optimization under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 319-353, May.
    18. Forget, Nicolas & Gadegaard, Sune Lauth & Nielsen, Lars Relund, 2022. "Warm-starting lower bound set computations for branch-and-bound algorithms for multi objective integer linear programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 909-924.
    19. Marie Schmidt & Leo Kroon & Anita Schöbel & Paul Bouman, 2017. "The Travelers Route Choice Problem Under Uncertainty: Dominance Relations Between Strategies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 184-199, February.
    20. Xiang, Yin, 2023. "Minimizing the maximal reliable path with a nodal interdiction model considering resource sharing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:66:y:2019:i:3:p:230-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.