IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugtixx/v34y2019i1-2p102-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Do Teachers Connect Better With Some Students Than Others? Exploring the Influence of Teachers’ Creative-Thinking Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Serap Gurak-Ozdemir
  • Selcuk Acar
  • Gerard Puccio
  • Cory Wright

Abstract

Teacher–student connection is influenced by several factors and one possible factor is teachers’ creative - thinking preferences (CTP). The present study investigated the extent to which teachers’ CTP predicts their view of favorable student characteristics. Teachers’ CTP was measured by FourSight that featured four preferences: clarifying, ideating, developing, and implementing. Two hundred seventy-five teachers in the United States completed the FourSight measure and the Torrance Ideal Child Checklist. This checklist of 66 adjectives asks the respondent to identify qualities that should be encouraged or discouraged in their students. Results showed that teachers have a tendency to support characteristics associated with their own preference. Specifically, teachers with a stronger Ideator preference showed a clear tendency to encourage ideating qualities among students over Developer and Implementer characteristics. In sharp contrast, teachers with higher Clarifier preferences did not favor ideating qualities. The results reveal an implicit bias on the part of teachers to promote qualities that align most with their own creative-thinking preferences. These findings underscore the importance of teacher training that promotes awareness of this creative thinking preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Serap Gurak-Ozdemir & Selcuk Acar & Gerard Puccio & Cory Wright, 2019. "Why Do Teachers Connect Better With Some Students Than Others? Exploring the Influence of Teachers’ Creative-Thinking Preferences," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1-2), pages 102-115, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:34:y:2019:i:1-2:p:102-115
    DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2019.1684221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15332276.2019.1684221
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15332276.2019.1684221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:34:y:2019:i:1-2:p:102-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.