IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v23y2023i3p453-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kurtosis-based risk parity: methodology and portfolio effects

Author

Listed:
  • M. D. Braga
  • C. R. Nava
  • M. G. Zoia

Abstract

In this paper, a risk parity strategy based on portfolio kurtosis as reference measure is introduced. This strategy allocates the asset weights in a portfolio in a manner that allows an homogeneous distribution of responsibility for portfolio returns' huge dispersion, since portfolio kurtosis puts more weight on extreme outcomes than standard deviation does. Therefore, the goal of the strategy is not the minimization of kurtosis, but rather its ‘fair diversification’ among assets. An original closed-form expression for portfolio kurtosis is devised to set up the optimization problem for this type of risk parity strategy. The latter is then compared with the one based on standard deviation by using data from a global equity investment universe and implementing an out-of-sample analysis. The kurtosis-based risk parity strategy has interesting portfolio effects, with lights and shadows. It outperforms the traditional risk parity according to main risk-adjusted performance measures. In terms of asset allocation solutions, it provides more unbalanced and more erratic portfolio weights (albeit without excluding any component) in comparison to those pertaining the traditional risk parity strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • M. D. Braga & C. R. Nava & M. G. Zoia, 2023. "Kurtosis-based risk parity: methodology and portfolio effects," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 453-469, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:23:y:2023:i:3:p:453-469
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2022.2145988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2022.2145988
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2022.2145988?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon Tang & Daniel Choi, 1998. "Impact of diversification on the distribution of stock returns: International evidence," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 22(2), pages 119-127, June.
    2. T. Roncalli & G. Weisang, 2016. "Risk parity portfolios with risk factors," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 377-388, March.
    3. Michaud, Richard O. & Michaud, Robert O., 2008. "Efficient Asset Management: A Practical Guide to Stock Portfolio Optimization and Asset Allocation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780195331912.
    4. Boudt, Kris & Lu, Wanbo & Peeters, Benedict, 2015. "Higher order comoments of multifactor models and asset allocation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 225-233.
    5. Eric Jondeau & Michael Rockinger, 2006. "Optimal Portfolio Allocation under Higher Moments," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 12(1), pages 29-55, January.
    6. Lassance, Nathan & Vrins, Frédéric, 2021. "Portfolio selection with parsimonious higher comoments estimation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. Ledoit, Oliver & Wolf, Michael, 2008. "Robust performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 850-859, December.
    8. Maroua Mhiri & Jean-Luc Prigent, 2010. "International Portfolio Optimization with Higher Moments," Post-Print hal-03679712, HAL.
    9. Eugene F. Fama, 1963. "Mandelbrot and the Stable Paretian Hypothesis," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36, pages 420-420.
    10. Magnus, J.R. & Neudecker, H., 1985. "Matrix differential calculus with applications to simple, Hadamard, and Kronecker products," Other publications TiSEM 1b2f1740-bfd1-4ea5-986c-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Kris Boudt & Dries Cornilly & Tim Verdonck, 2020. "A Coskewness Shrinkage Approach for Estimating the Skewness of Linear Combinations of Random Variables [International Asset Allocation with Regime Shifts]," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Society for Financial Econometrics, vol. 18(1), pages 1-23.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4688 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. You, Leyuan & Daigler, Robert T., 2010. "Is international diversification really beneficial?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 163-173, January.
    14. Lionel Martellini & Volker Ziemann, 2010. "Improved Estimates of Higher-Order Comoments and Implications for Portfolio Selection," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(4), pages 1467-1502, April.
    15. Scott, Robert C & Horvath, Philip A, 1980. "On the Direction of Preference for Moments of Higher Order Than the Variance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 35(4), pages 915-919, September.
    16. Zoia, Maria Grazia & Biffi, Paola & Nicolussi, Federica, 2018. "Value at risk and expected shortfall based on Gram-Charlier-like expansions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 92-104.
    17. Chunhachinda, Pornchai & Dandapani, Krishnan & Hamid, Shahid & Prakash, Arun J., 1997. "Portfolio selection and skewness: Evidence from international stock markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 143-167, February.
    18. Best, Michael J & Grauer, Robert R, 1991. "On the Sensitivity of Mean-Variance-Efficient Portfolios to Changes in Asset Means: Some Analytical and Computational Results," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 4(2), pages 315-342.
    19. Longin, Francois M, 1996. "The Asymptotic Distribution of Extreme Stock Market Returns," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(3), pages 383-408, July.
    20. Xi Bai & Katya Scheinberg & Reha Tutuncu, 2016. "Least-squares approach to risk parity in portfolio selection," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 357-376, March.
    21. Helmut Mausser & Oleksandr Romanko, 2018. "Long-only equal risk contribution portfolios for CVaR under discrete distributions," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(11), pages 1927-1945, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gilles Boevi Koumou, 2023. "Risk budgeting using a generalized diversity index," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(6), pages 443-458, October.
    2. Ravi Kashyap, 2024. "The Blockchain Risk Parity Line: Moving From The Efficient Frontier To The Final Frontier Of Investments," Papers 2407.09536, arXiv.org.
    3. Braga, Maria Debora & Nava, Consuelo Rubina & Zoia, Maria Grazia, 2023. "Kurtosis-based vs volatility-based asset allocation strategies: Do they share the same properties? A first empirical investigation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lassance, Nathan & Vrins, Frédéric, 2021. "Portfolio selection with parsimonious higher comoments estimation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. M. Barkhagen & S. García & J. Gondzio & J. Kalcsics & J. Kroeske & S. Sabanis & A. Staal, 2023. "Optimising portfolio diversification and dimensionality," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 185-234, January.
    3. Lassance, Nathan & Vrins, Frédéric, 2019. "Robust portfolio selection using sparse estimation of comoment tensors," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2019007, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    4. Brinkmann, Felix & Kempf, Alexander & Korn, Olaf, 2013. "Forward-looking measures of higher-order dependencies with an application to portfolio selection," CFR Working Papers 13-08, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    5. Díaz, Antonio & Escribano, Ana & Esparcia, Carlos, 2024. "Sustainable risk preferences on asset allocation: a higher order optimal portfolio study," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    6. Khashanah, Khaldoun & Simaan, Majeed & Simaan, Yusif, 2022. "Do we need higher-order comoments to enhance mean-variance portfolios? Evidence from a simplified jump process," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Alexios Ghalanos & Eduardo Rossi & Giovanni Urga, 2015. "Independent Factor Autoregressive Conditional Density Model," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 594-616, May.
    8. Eric Jondeau & Michael Rockinger, 2006. "Optimal Portfolio Allocation under Higher Moments," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 12(1), pages 29-55, January.
    9. K. Saranya & P. Prasanna, 2014. "Portfolio Selection and Optimization with Higher Moments: Evidence from the Indian Stock Market," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 21(2), pages 133-149, May.
    10. Lassance, Nathan, 2022. "Reconciling mean-variance portfolio theory with non-Gaussian returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 729-740.
    11. Brinkmann, Felix & Kempf, Alexander & Korn, Olaf, 2014. "Forward-looking measures of higher-order dependencies with an application to portfolio selection," CFR Working Papers 13-08 [rev.], University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    12. Khaki, Audil & Prasad, Mason & Al-Mohamad, Somar & Bakry, Walid & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2023. "Re-evaluating portfolio diversification and design using cryptocurrencies: Are decentralized cryptocurrencies enough?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Boudt, Kris & Cornilly, Dries & Verdonck, Tim, 2020. "Nearest comoment estimation with unobserved factors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 381-397.
    14. Walter Briec & Kristiaan Kerstens & Octave Jokung, 2007. "Mean-Variance-Skewness Portfolio Performance Gauging: A General Shortage Function and Dual Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 135-149, January.
    15. Paul Karehnke & Frans de Roon, 2020. "Spanning Tests for Assets with Option-Like Payoffs: The Case of Hedge Funds," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5969-5989, December.
    16. Chenglu Jin & Thomas Conlon & John Cotter, 2023. "Co-Skewness across Return Horizons," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(5), pages 1483-1518.
    17. Eric Jondeau & Michael Rockinger, 2005. "Conditional Asset Allocation under Non-Normality: How Costly is the Mean-Variance Criterion?," FAME Research Paper Series rp132, International Center for Financial Asset Management and Engineering.
    18. Gulder Kemalbay & C. Murat Ozkut & Ceki Franko, 2011. "Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments: A Polynomial Goal Programming Approach to ISE-30 Index," Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal, Department of Econometrics, Faculty of Economics, Istanbul University, vol. 13(1), pages 41-61, Special I.
    19. Adil Rengim Cetingoz & Olivier Gu'eant, 2023. "Asset and Factor Risk Budgeting: A Balanced Approach," Papers 2312.11132, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    20. Krüger, Jens J., 2024. "Nonparametric portfolio efficiency measurement with higher moments," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 144371, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:23:y:2023:i:3:p:453-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.