IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jhudca/v23y2022i4p509-538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender and Intersecting Inequalities in Education: Reflections on a Framework for Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Elaine Unterhalter
  • Helen Longlands
  • Rosie Peppin Vaughan

Abstract

This article considers how useful measurement and indicators are in developing insight into a problem as complex as gender injustice and education. It poses the question about what we ought to evaluate with regard to individuals, institutions, discourses and countries when we make assertions about gender inequality in education and how to address this. The paper provides a way of thinking about gender and education that highlights how inadequate existing measures are. It sets an agenda for future work outlining the AGEE (Accountability for Gender Equality and Education) Framework. This draws on the capability approach and identifies domains where indicators can be deployed. The discussion highlights how multiple sources of information can be used in a well-organised yet adaptable combination, taking account of the complexity of the processes in play, to develop guidance on practice for transformational and sustainable change that can support work on women’s rights and gender equality in education.

Suggested Citation

  • Elaine Unterhalter & Helen Longlands & Rosie Peppin Vaughan, 2022. "Gender and Intersecting Inequalities in Education: Reflections on a Framework for Measurement," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 509-538, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:23:y:2022:i:4:p:509-538
    DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2022.2090523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19452829.2022.2090523
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19452829.2022.2090523?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:23:y:2022:i:4:p:509-538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJHD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.