IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v27y2021i4-5p397-418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fintech development and bank risk taking in China

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Wang
  • Jiangtao Liu
  • Hang(Robin) Luo

Abstract

This paper empirically tests the effect of FinTech development on bank risk taking using unbalanced bank-level panel data from China for the period from 2011 to 2018. We use the media's attention paid to FinTech-related information to gauge FinTech development. We find robust evidence that the development of FinTech exacerbates banks’ risk taking in general. The heterogeneity analysis further indicates that the asset quality deterioration effect brought about by prosperous FinTech is more salient in banks with larger sizes, lower efficiency, more shadow banking business and more interest-based income. Moreover, the nexus between FinTech and banks’ risk taking is a U-shaped trend, with FinTech initially intensifying and then weakening banks’ risk taking. Moreover, the banks’ responses regarding the U-shaped effect are heterogeneous among different ownership structures. The responses by state- and jointly owned banks are not notable, while those of city banks, foreign banks and rural banks are more sensitive.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Wang & Jiangtao Liu & Hang(Robin) Luo, 2021. "Fintech development and bank risk taking in China," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4-5), pages 397-418, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:27:y:2021:i:4-5:p:397-418
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2020.1805782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1805782
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1805782?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:27:y:2021:i:4-5:p:397-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.