IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdanxx/v40y2024i1p60-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outsourcing national defense: an impediment to the US strategy of great power competition

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Bruneau

Abstract

My goals in this paper are to elaborate further an approach to civil-military relations going beyond control to include effectiveness; and, to argue that outsourcing by the Department of Defense (DoD) results in opportunity costs making very difficult the implementation of the national security strategy of “great power competition.” The current acquisition authority for outsourcing impedes DoD accessing cutting-edge technology generated by “startups.” In an earlier era of strategic competition, the main US response was to create the National Aeronautics and Space Agency with a new acquisition authority – “other transaction authority” (OTA). In the National Defense Authorization Act of FY 2018 Congress stipulated that OTAs should be the preference for DoD in science and technology and prototyping, and education in OTAs be provided. This education has not been implemented. Consequently, a key element of the US great power competition strategy, which is the acquisition of new technology, goes wanting.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Bruneau, 2024. "Outsourcing national defense: an impediment to the US strategy of great power competition," Defense & Security Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 60-79, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdanxx:v:40:y:2024:i:1:p:60-79
    DOI: 10.1080/14751798.2024.2285139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14751798.2024.2285139
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14751798.2024.2285139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdanxx:v:40:y:2024:i:1:p:60-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.