IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sls/ipmsls/v39y20204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Vertically Integrated Perspective on Nordic Manufacturing Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Lind

Abstract

Specialization, at the national and global level, and a growing importance of knowledge-based capital in current growth processes have led to a renewed interest in a vertically integrated perspective on productivity. This means that the focus is on all steps of the production process, regardless of in what sector or country the value creation takes place. From this perspective, Norway has improved its relative productivity since 2000 and is now the leader among the Nordic countries. Finland – and Sweden to some extent – have performed relatively poorly. Using import multipliers and splitting the domestic production chain into two productivity measures, this article shows that the vertically integrated perspective can contribute to new insights about productivity developments in trade-dependent and highly specialized countries. Important aspects of a policy for an enhanced vertically-integrated productivity are the quality of human capital, enhanced diffusion of knowledge and innovations and a holistic view of economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Lind, 2020. "A Vertically Integrated Perspective on Nordic Manufacturing Productivity," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 39, pages 53-73, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:39:y:2020:4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.csls.ca/ipm/39/Lind.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Theo Santini & Ricardo Azevedo Araujo, 2021. "Productivity growth and sectoral interactions under Domar aggregation: a study for the Brazilian economy from 2000 to 2014," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 10(1), pages 1-30, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:39:y:2020:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CSLS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cslssca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.