IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/spppps/0256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artyści współcześni nadal niewidoczni. Konsekwencje braku efektywnej polityki publicznej wobec twórców sztuki w latach 2020-2021

Author

Listed:
  • Wijas, Jędrzej

    (Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Wydział Nauk Społecznych)

Abstract

Doświadczenie związane z pandemią COVID-19 uwidoczniło m.in. braki w politykach publicznych w Polsce. Według autora artykułu do polityk publicznych można zaliczyć również działania władzy wobec artystów. W tekście zdiagnozowany został status artystów jako grupy docelowej polityki publicznej w systemie demokratycznym. Opisano proces tworzenia regulacji prawnych statusu artysty zawodowego w Polsce. Przedmiotem szczegółowej analizy stały się decyzje rządu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej dotyczące artystów podejmowane w latach 2020­-2021. Problemy techniczne, formalne i medialne władz z dystrybucją środków pomocowych dla artystów w Polsce są wiązane z brakiem prawnej definicji artysty w polskim systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych, a szerzej - w politykach publicznych. Wobec nieukończenia prac legislacyjnych dotyczących statusu artysty przed wystąpieniem 5. fali pandemii COVID-19 przewidywane jest ponowne wystąpienie problemów w zarządzaniu pomocą publiczną dla artystów w Polsce.

Suggested Citation

  • Wijas, Jędrzej, 2022. "Artyści współcześni nadal niewidoczni. Konsekwencje braku efektywnej polityki publicznej wobec twórców sztuki w latach 2020-2021," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/KSzPP/article/view/2769
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: azybal@sgh.waw.pl
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schneider, Anne & Ingram, Helen, 1993. "Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(2), pages 334-347, June.
    2. Muzychuk, V., 2021. "Culture in the context of COVID-19: Impact assessment and support measures," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 49(1), pages 217-222.
    3. Armenia ANDRONICEANU, 2020. "Major Structural Changes In The Eu Policies Due To The Problems And Risks Caused By Covid-19," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 137-149, June.
    4. Aldona Migała-Warchoł & Monika Pichla, 2021. "Forecasting the number of cases and deaths from Covid-19," International Entrepreneurship Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 7(1), pages 73-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maddison, Jonathan & Watts, Richard, 2011. "The technological fix as a frame in media debates about tailpipe emissions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 294-303.
    2. Fritz Sager & Yvan Rielle, 2013. "Sorting through the garbage can: under what conditions do governments adopt policy programs?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Margarita Išoraitė & Gintarė Gulevičiūtė, 2021. "A study of online entrepreneurship education under conditions of a pandemic," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 179-192, March.
    4. Frank R. Baumgartner & Christine Mahoney, 2008. "Forum Section: The Two Faces of Framing," European Union Politics, , vol. 9(3), pages 435-449, September.
    5. Yao Zhu & Shousheng Chai & Jieqi Chen & Ian Phau, 2024. "How was rural tourism developed in China? Examining the impact of China’s evolving rural tourism policies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28945-28969, November.
    6. Daniel Béland & Alex Jingwei He & M Ramesh, 2022. "COVID-19, crisis responses, and public policies: from the persistence of inequalities to the importance of policy design [The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(2), pages 187-198.
    7. Beata GAVUROVA & Matus KUBAK & Martin MIKESKA, 2020. "The Efficiency Of Public Procurement In The Health Sector – The Platform On Sustainable Public Finances," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(35), pages 21-39, December.
    8. Matt Guardino & Suzanne Mettler, 2020. "Revealing the “Hidden welfare state†: How policy information influences public attitudes about tax expenditures," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    9. Christopher Weible & David Carter, 2015. "The composition of policy change: comparing Colorado’s 1977 and 2006 smoking bans," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(2), pages 207-231, June.
    10. Lorenz Kammermann & Karin Ingold, 2019. "Going beyond technocratic and democratic principles: stakeholder acceptance of instruments in Swiss energy policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(1), pages 43-65, March.
    11. Clare Daniel & Anna Mahoney & Grace Riley, 2024. "The Politics of Problem Definition: Abortion Policy in Republican-Controlled Louisiana," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Neal D. Woods, 2021. "The State of State Environmental Policy Research: A Thirty‐Year Progress Report," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(3), pages 347-369, May.
    13. Rodney E. Hero, 2002. "Language policy and identity politics in the United States," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(1), pages 151-153.
    14. Cousins, Linwood H., 2013. "Deservingness, children in poverty, and collective well being," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1252-1259.
    15. Vicinanza, Paul & Goldberg, Amir & Srivastava, Sameer, 2021. "Quantifying Vision through Language Demonstrates that Visionary Ideas Come from the Periphery," OSF Preprints 3h8xp, Center for Open Science.
    16. Anthony Perl & Michael Howlett & M. Ramesh, 2018. "Policy-making and truthiness: Can existing policy models cope with politicized evidence and willful ignorance in a “post-fact” world?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 581-600, December.
    17. Carol A. Heimer & Elsinore Kuo, 2021. "Subterranean successes: Durable regulation and regulatory endowments," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(S1), pages 63-82, November.
    18. Momi Dahan, 2023. "Social Construction And The Progressivity Of Local Tax Relief," Israel Economic Review, Bank of Israel, vol. 21(1), pages 1-33, March.
    19. Christopher A. Simon & Michael C. Moltz, 2019. "Immigrant Citizens and Racial Resentment in International Policy Perspective: The Role of Nativity and Racial Resentment in Shaping Support for US Foreign Assistance Expenditure, 2002–2016," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 62(1), pages 186-195, December.
    20. Jora Broerse, 2019. "“How Do We Put Him in the System?”: Client Construction at a Sport-Based Migrant Settlement Service in Melbourne, Australia," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 238-247.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    polityka kulturalna; rząd Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej; sztuka; pandemia; COVID-19;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcin Ochalski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.