Author
Listed:
- Jayne F Tierney
- David J Fisher
- Claire L Vale
- Sarah Burdett
- Larysa H Rydzewska
- Ewelina Rogozińska
- Peter J Godolphin
- Ian R White
- Mahesh K B Parmar
Abstract
Background: The vast majority of systematic reviews are planned retrospectively, once most eligible trials have completed and reported, and are based on aggregate data that can be extracted from publications. Prior knowledge of trial results can introduce bias into both review and meta-analysis methods, and the omission of unpublished data can lead to reporting biases. We present a collaborative framework for prospective, adaptive meta-analysis (FAME) of aggregate data to provide results that are less prone to bias. Also, with FAME, we monitor how evidence from trials is accumulating, to anticipate the earliest opportunity for a potentially definitive meta-analysis. Methodology: We developed and piloted FAME alongside 4 systematic reviews in prostate cancer, which allowed us to refine the key principles. These are to: (1) start the systematic review process early, while trials are ongoing or yet to report; (2) liaise with trial investigators to develop a detailed picture of all eligible trials; (3) prospectively assess the earliest possible timing for reliable meta-analysis based on the accumulating aggregate data; (4) develop and register (or publish) the systematic review protocol before trials produce results and seek appropriate aggregate data; (5) interpret meta-analysis results taking account of both available and unavailable data; and (6) assess the value of updating the systematic review and meta-analysis. These principles are illustrated via a hypothetical review and their application to 3 published systematic reviews. Conclusions: FAME can reduce the potential for bias and produce more timely, thorough, and reliable systematic reviews of aggregate data. Jayne Tierney and coauthors discuss FAME, an approach for adaptive meta-analysis of data from randomised trials.
Suggested Citation
Jayne F Tierney & David J Fisher & Claire L Vale & Sarah Burdett & Larysa H Rydzewska & Ewelina Rogozińska & Peter J Godolphin & Ian R White & Mahesh K B Parmar, 2021.
"A framework for prospective, adaptive meta-analysis (FAME) of aggregate data from randomised trials,"
PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pmed00:1003629
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003629
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1003629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.