IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-02806-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil liability for the actions of autonomous AI in healthcare: an invitation to further contemplation

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Eldakak

    (United Arab Emirates University
    Alexandria University)

  • Abdulla Alremeithi

    (United Arab Emirates University)

  • Emad Dahiyat

    (United Arab Emirates University)

  • Moatasem El-Gheriani

    (United Arab Emirates University
    Alexandria University)

  • Hassan Mohamed

    (United Arab Emirates University)

  • Mohammad Ibrahim Abdulrahim Abdulla

    (United Arab Emirates University)

Abstract

There are already a number of autonomous robots that play a significant role in improving the quality of healthcare in different areas ranging from basic health diagnosis to complex surgeries. However, using robots and machine learning applications in the healthcare context poses concerns over liability for patient injury. This paper will thus attempt to investigate the potential legal problems that might arise if AI technology evolves or is commonly used in clinical practice. It also examines whether the traditional doctrines of liability can adequately address the liability for the injuries stemming from acts of autonomous robots. As such, this paper adopted both descriptive and analytical methodologies to explore the main focus of the study. while the descriptive methodology was used to spot light on various theories of liability, the analytical methodology was used to critically examine the main theories that have been advanced to deal with autonomous robots and predict the necessity of legal reform. Throughout this paper, the authors insist on the importance of distinguishing between robots in light of their degree of autonomy and then drafting liability rules depending on whether the action was done autonomously by an unattended robot or whether it was done automatically by an attended robot. Finally, the paper concludes with the proposal of a series of factors to be considered for the future regulation of AI Robots in the healthcare context.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Eldakak & Abdulla Alremeithi & Emad Dahiyat & Moatasem El-Gheriani & Hassan Mohamed & Mohammad Ibrahim Abdulrahim Abdulla, 2024. "Civil liability for the actions of autonomous AI in healthcare: an invitation to further contemplation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-02806-y
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-02806-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-02806-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-02806-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel P. Kessler, 2011. "Evaluating the Medical Malpractice System and Options for Reform," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 25(2), pages 93-110, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhan Wang & Niying Li & Mengsi Jiang & Keith Dear & Chee-Ruey Hsieh, 2017. "Records of medical malpractice litigation: A potential indicator of healthcare quality in China," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-144, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Andrew Friedson & Thomas Kniesner, 2012. "Losers and losers: Some demographics of medical malpractice tort reforms," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 115-133, October.
    3. Sebastian Panthöfer, 2022. "Do doctors prescribe antibiotics out of fear of malpractice?," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 340-381, June.
    4. Ian A. MacKenzie & Markus Ohndorf, 2016. "Caps on Coasean transfers," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 566-584.
    5. James A. Brickley & Susan F. Lu & Gerard J. Wedig, 2022. "Are firms with ‘deep pockets’ more responsive to tort liability? Evidence from nursing homes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(8), pages 1590-1617, August.
    6. T. Renee Bowen & David M. Kreps & Andrzej Skrzypacz, 2013. "Rules with Discretion and Local Information," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(3), pages 1273-1320.
    7. Jinhyung Lee, 2017. "Impact of hospitalist care on hospital malpractice premiums using California hospital data," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(11), pages 742-752, June.
    8. Paola Bertoli & Veronica Grembi, 2018. "Medical Malpractice: How Legal Liability Affects Medical Decisions," Contributions to Economic Analysis, in: Health Econometrics, volume 127, pages 235-261, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    9. Antoci, Angelo & Fiori Maccioni, Alessandro & Russu, Paolo & Sacco, Pier Luigi, 2022. "Curing is caring? Liability reforms, defensive medicine and malpractice litigation in a post-pandemic world," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. Michael Osti & Johannes Steyrer, 2017. "A perspective on the health care expenditures for defensive medicine," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(4), pages 399-404, May.
    11. Liu, Gordon & Yi, Junjian & Yuan, Ye & Zhao, Shaoyang, 2023. "The short- and long-run effects of medical malpractice lawsuits on medical spending and hospital operations in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 1142-1161.
    12. Jingshu Luo & Hua Chen & Martin Grace, 2022. "Medicaid expansion, tort reforms, and medical liability costs," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(3), pages 789-821, September.
    13. Galasso, Alberto & Luo, Hong, 2016. "Tort Reform and Innovation," CEPR Discussion Papers 11358, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Jing Hua Zhang, 2015. "Bend the healthcare cost curve without pain? The health outcome after the Medicare reimbursement cut in 1997," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 164-172, April.
    15. Castro, M.F.; & Ferrara, P.; & Guccio, C.; & Lisi, D.;, 2018. "Medical Malpractice Liability and Physicians’ Behavior:Experimental Evidence," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 18/11, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    16. Laurence C. Baker & Kate Bundorf & Daniel Kessler, 2014. "Expanding Patients' Property Rights In Their Medical Records," NBER Working Papers 20565, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Castro, Massimo Finocchiaro & Ferrara, Paolo Lorenzo & Guccio, Calogero & Lisi, Domenico, 2019. "Medical malpractice liability and physicians’ behavior: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 646-666.
    18. Sofia, AmaralGarcia & Veronica, Grembi, 2011. "Curb your premium! evaluating state intervention in medical malpractice insurance," MPRA Paper 32301, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Brian K. Chen & Chun‐Yuh Yang, 2014. "Increased Perception of Malpractice Liability and the Practice of Defensive Medicine," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 446-476, September.
    20. Laurence C. Baker & M. Kate Bundorf & Daniel P. Kessler, 2015. "Expanding Patients' Property Rights in Their Medical Records," American Journal of Health Economics, MIT Press, vol. 1(1), pages 82-100, Winter.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-02806-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.