IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxxy2020i1p954-961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Aspects Regarding the Financing of the Environment Fund in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Teodor Hada

    (“Bogdan Vodă†University of Cluj-Napoca)

  • Iulia Iuga

    (“1st of December 2018†University of Alba Iulia)

  • Dorin Wainberg

    (“1st of December 2018†University of Alba Iulia)

Abstract

The Environmental Fund is an economic and financial instrument designed to support and implement projects and programs for environmental protection. There is an ongoing debate on the criteria for allocating environmental funding, in particular the adjustment of funding. The specialized literature focused mainly on the optimal tax rate, on investments and expenditures with environmental protection at macroeconomic level. In the specialized literature in Romania there are no case studies presented at enterprise level (microeconomic). According to O.U.G. no. 196/2005 on the Environmental Fund, with subsequent amendments and completions, constitutes an income to the Environmental Fund a contribution of 2% of the revenues from the sale of waste obtained by the owner of the waste. The amounts are withheld at source by the economic operators who have the obligation to calculate and transfer the amounts. Thus, we will study the way of recording by companies (at microeconomic level) the contribution of 2% that constitutes income to the Environmental Fund.

Suggested Citation

  • Teodor Hada & Iulia Iuga & Dorin Wainberg, 2020. "Some Aspects Regarding the Financing of the Environment Fund in Romania," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 954-961, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xx:y:2020:i:1:p:954-961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://stec.univ-ovidius.ro/html/anale/RO/2020/Section%205/15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pekovic, Sanja & Grolleau, Gilles & Mzoughi, Naoufel, 2018. "Environmental investments: Too much of a good thing?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 297-302.
    2. Chang, Chun-Ping & Dong, Minyi & Liu, Jiliang, 2019. "Environmental Governance and Environmental Performance," ADBI Working Papers 936, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    3. Chun-Ping Chang & Minyi Dong & Jiliang Liu, 2019. "Environmental Governance and Environmental Performance," Working Papers id:13023, eSocialSciences.
    4. Azadegan, Arash & Golara, Sina & Kach, Andrew & Mousavi, Nasim, 2018. "Corporate environmental investments: A cross-national study on managerial decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 47-64.
    5. Woohyung Lee & Tohru Naito & Ki-Dong Lee, 2017. "Effects of Mixed Oligopoly and Emission Taxes on the Market and Environment," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 33, pages 267-294.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Bihong & Xu, Yining, 2019. "Environmental Performance in Asia: Overview, Drivers, and Policy Implications," ADBI Working Papers 990, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    2. Zhice Cheng & Xinyuan Chen & Huwei Wen, 2022. "How Does Environmental Protection Tax Affect Corporate Environmental Investment? Evidence from Chinese Listed Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Runhui Lin & Yuan Gui & Zaiyang Xie & Lu Liu, 2019. "Green Governance and International Business Strategies of Emerging Economies’ Multinational Enterprises: A Multiple-Case Study of Chinese Firms in Pollution-Intensive Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-32, February.
    4. Jassem Suaad & Zakaria Zarina & Che Azmi Anna, 2020. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Architecture and Environmental Investment Decision-Making," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 193-210, January.
    5. Ying Sun & Kexin Zhang & Xuyang Li, 2024. "The Impact of Environmental Protection Investment and Equity Balance Degree on Economic Performance and Eco-Autonomy: An Empirical Study of China’s A-Share Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, September.
    6. McArthur, John W. & Rasmussen, Krista, 2019. "Classifying Sustainable Development Goal trajectories: A country-level methodology for identifying which issues and people are getting left behind," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Ajay Kumar & Jyotirani Gupta & Niladri Das, 2022. "Revisiting the influence of corporate sustainability practices on corporate financial performance: An evidence from the global energy sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3231-3253, November.
    8. Ben Lahouel, Béchir & Ben Zaied, Younes & Managi, Shunsuke & Taleb, Lotfi, 2022. "Re-thinking about U: The relevance of regime-switching model in the relationship between environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 498-519.
    9. Haleem Fazli & Sami Farooq & Cheng Yang & Brian Vejrum Wæhrens, 2023. "Proactive and Reactive Approaches towards Sustainable Practices in Manufacturing Companies: Emerging Economies Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Mingxia Liu & Liqian Liu & Amei Feng, 2024. "The Impact of Green Innovation on Corporate Performance: An Analysis Based on Substantive and Strategic Green Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Ahmed Hassan Abdou & Thowayeb H. Hassan & Amany E. Salem & Mohamed Ahmed Elsaied & Ahmed Anwar Elsaed, 2022. "Determinants and Consequences of Green Investment in the Saudi Arabian Hotel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Ilija Moric & Jelena Šaković Jovanović & Rajka Đoković & Sanja Peković & Đurđica Perović, 2020. "The Effect of Phases of the Adoption of the Circular Economy on Firm Performance: Evidence from 28 EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.
    13. Liu, Liqian & Feng, Amei & Liu, Mingxia, 2024. "The effect of green innovation on corporate financial performance: Does quality matter?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    14. Jing Wang & Yunshi Mao, 2020. "Pains and gains of environmental management system certification for the sustainable development of manufacturing companies: Heterogeneous effects of industry peer learning," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 2092-2109, July.
    15. Siew − Peng Lee, 2021. "Environmental responsibility, CEO power and financial performance in the energy sector," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(8), pages 2407-2426, November.
    16. Yaoxiaoxue Hong & Xianling Jiang & Beibei Shi & Chang Yu, 2022. "Do Fiscal Environmental Protection Expenditures Crowd Out Corporate Environmental Protection Investments?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Andreea Chițimiea & Mihaela Minciu & Andreea-Mariana Manta & Carmen Nadia Ciocoiu & Cristina Veith, 2021. "The Drivers of Green Investment: A Bibliometric and Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    18. Wei Cao & Martina Linnenluecke & Jinfang Tian & Rui Xue & Huan Yang, 2023. "How does investor attention affect energy firms' managerial opportunistic behavior? New evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 5025-5043, November.
    19. Sung-Hoon Park & Chad Settle, 2022. "Internalizing environmental damages and endogenous reimbursement in environmental conflicts: a game-theoretic analysis," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 69(4), pages 547-569, December.
    20. Kabir, Md Nurul & Rahman, Sohanur & Rahman, Md Arifur & Anwar, Mumtaheena, 2021. "Carbon emissions and default risk: International evidence from firm-level data," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    finance; ecology; environmental fund; accounting monograph;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • H32 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Firm

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xx:y:2020:i:1:p:954-961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gheorghiu Gabriela (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoviro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.