Author
Listed:
- Olivier Mascaro
(Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center)
- Nicolas Goupil
(Institut des Sciences Cognitives—Marc Jeannerod, UMR5229, CNRS and Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1)
- Hugo Pantecouteau
(École normale supérieure de Lyon)
- Adeline Depierreux
(Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center)
- Jean-Baptiste Henst
(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, U1028, UMR5292, Trajectoires)
- Nicolas Claidière
(Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LPC)
Abstract
This study investigates the structure of social hierarchies. We hypothesized that if social dominance relations serve to regulate conflicts over resources, then hierarchies should converge towards pyramidal shapes. Structural analyses and simulations confirmed this hypothesis, revealing a triadic-pyramidal motif across human and non-human hierarchies (114 species). Phylogenetic analyses showed that this pyramidal motif is widespread, with little influence of group size or phylogeny. Furthermore, nine experiments conducted in France found that human adults (N = 120) and infants (N = 120) draw inferences about dominance relations that are consistent with hierarchies’ pyramidal motif. By contrast, human participants do not draw equivalent inferences based on a tree-shaped pattern with a similar complexity to pyramids. In short, social hierarchies exhibit a pyramidal motif across a wide range of species and environments. From infancy, humans exploit this regularity to draw systematic inferences about unobserved dominance relations, using processes akin to formal reasoning.
Suggested Citation
Olivier Mascaro & Nicolas Goupil & Hugo Pantecouteau & Adeline Depierreux & Jean-Baptiste Henst & Nicolas Claidière, 2023.
"Human and animal dominance hierarchies show a pyramidal structure guiding adult and infant social inferences,"
Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 1294-1306, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nathum:v:7:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1038_s41562-023-01634-5
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01634-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:7:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1038_s41562-023-01634-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.