IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/jpjrnl/v2y2022i1p31-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Tetrapharmakos (Fourfold Cure) and the Sober Reasoning in Epicurus: A Critical Philosophical Paradigm against the Politicization of Medical Truth?

Author

Listed:
  • Αnna Ch. Markopoulou

    (University of Sorbonne (Paris V René Descartes))

Abstract

In the present paper, we will discuss how the therapeutic effect of Epicurean philosophy as a pharmakon for human passions constitutes a critical philosophical paradigm against the politicization of medical truth. More specifically, we will argue that the concept of correcting habits of thought, which confers a philosophical meaning on the Greek word pharmakon, constructs a dialectical relationship of unity between nature and man. Then we will show that this conception is in contrast to the traditional meaning of pharmakon as an artificial means of therapy, which is ideologicalised in the politicization of medical truth, since it presupposes a technocratic conception leading to a dualism between superior technology, which rules, and inferior human nature, which is ruled. We will argue that establishing an enhancement of human nature as it ensues from the Epicurean ethics of the tetrapharmakos constitutes a critical philosophical paradigm against the politicization of medical truth.

Suggested Citation

  • Αnna Ch. Markopoulou, 2022. "The Tetrapharmakos (Fourfold Cure) and the Sober Reasoning in Epicurus: A Critical Philosophical Paradigm against the Politicization of Medical Truth?," Journal of Posthumanism, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 2(1), pages 31-35, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:mig:jpjrnl:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:31-35
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/joph.v2i1.1856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/jp/article/view/1856/1521
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/joph.v2i1.1856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:jpjrnl:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:31-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TPLondon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.