IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A minőség figyelembevételének szükségessége az egyensúlyi állapot meghatározásában
[The need to consider quality when determining a state of equilibrium]

Author

Listed:
  • Vörös, József

Abstract

A tanulmány arra keres választ, hogy milyen minőségpolitika alkalmazása növeli a vállalati versenyképességet. A tisztánlátás azért nem tűnik egyszerűnek, mert a minőségpolitika hasznosságának megítélése igen vegyes az irodalomban. Mind a verbális, mind a formalizált gazdaságtudomány keresi a választ. A tanulmány összegzi a főbb irányzatok megközelítéseit, majd definiál egy módszertanilag könnyen kezelhető modellt, amelynek elemzésével további segítséget nyerhetünk a minőség szerepének megítéléséhez. A vizsgálódás egyik legfőbb következtetése, hogy önmagában nem elegendő a minőséget folyamatosan fejleszteni. Csak a minőség növelésére történő koncentrálás tévút, ha mögötte nem a termelési hatékonyság fejlesztése húzódik meg.* Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: D, D24, C62.

Suggested Citation

  • Vörös, József, 2003. "A minőség figyelembevételének szükségessége az egyensúlyi állapot meghatározásában [The need to consider quality when determining a state of equilibrium]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 6-21.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=584
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tapiero, Charles S. & Ritchken, Peter H. & Reisman, Arnold, 1987. "Reliability, pricing and quality control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 37-45, July.
    2. Janice E. Carrillo & Cheryl Gaimon, 2000. "Improving Manufacturing Performance Through Process Change and Knowledge Creation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 265-288, February.
    3. Goyal, S. K. & Gunasekaran, A. & Martikainen, T. & Yli-Olli, P., 1993. "Integrating production and quality control policies: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 1-13, August.
    4. James R. Dorroh & Thomas R. Gulledge & Norman K. Womer, 1994. "Investment in Knowledge: A Generalization of Learning By Experience," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(8), pages 947-958, August.
    5. Charles H. Fine, 1986. "Quality Improvement and Learning in Productive Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(10), pages 1301-1315, October.
    6. Uday Karmarkar & Richard Pitbladdo, 1993. "Internal Pricing and Cost Allocation in a Model of Multiproduct Competition with Finite Capacity Increments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(9), pages 1039-1053, September.
    7. Mohan V. Tatikonda & Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss, 2001. "Integrating Operations and Marketing Perspectives of Product Innovation: The Influence of Organizational Process Factors and Capabilities on Development Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 151-172, January.
    8. Charles H. Fine & Evan L. Porteus, 1989. "Dynamic Process Improvement," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 580-591, August.
    9. Voros, Jozsef, 2002. "Product balancing under conditions of quality inflation, cost pressures and growth strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 153-166, August.
    10. John H. Roberts & Glen L. Urban, 1988. "Modeling Multiattribute Utility, Risk, and Belief Dynamics for New Consumer Durable Brand Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 167-185, February.
    11. van Beek, Paul & van Putten, Cornelis, 1987. "OR contributions to flexibility improvement in production/inventory systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 52-60, July.
    12. Charles H. Fine, 1988. "A Quality Control Model with Learning Effects," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 437-444, June.
    13. Voros, Jozsef, 1999. "Lot sizing with quality improvement and setup time reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 568-574, March.
    14. Evan L. Porteus, 1985. "Investing in Reduced Setups in the EOQ Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(8), pages 998-1010, August.
    15. Imran S. Currim & Rakesh K. Sarin, 1984. "A Comparative Evaluation of Multiattribute Consumer Preference Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 543-561, May.
    16. Evan L. Porteus, 1986. "Optimal Lot Sizing, Process Quality Improvement and Setup Cost Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 137-144, February.
    17. Kevin B. Hendricks & Vinod R. Singhal, 1997. "Does Implementing an Effective TQM Program Actually Improve Operating Performance? Empirical Evidence from Firms That Have Won Quality Awards," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(9), pages 1258-1274, September.
    18. George Li & S. Rajagopalan, 1998. "Process Improvement, Quality, and Learning Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-1), pages 1517-1532, November.
    19. Stephen A. Smith & Dale D. Achabal, 1998. "Clearance Pricing and Inventory Policies for Retail Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 285-300, March.
    20. Cheng, T. C. E., 1989. "An economic production quantity model with flexibility and reliability considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 174-179, March.
    21. Sadao Sakakibara & Barbara B. Flynn & Roger G. Schroeder & William T. Morris, 1997. "The Impact of Just-in-Time Manufacturing and Its Infrastructure on Manufacturing Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(9), pages 1246-1257, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Voros, Jozsef, 2002. "Product balancing under conditions of quality inflation, cost pressures and growth strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 153-166, August.
    2. Voros, Jozsef, 2006. "The dynamics of price, quality and productivity improvement decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(3), pages 809-823, May.
    3. Vörös, József, 2008. "A kereslet hatása az árak, a minőség és a fejlesztési döntések dinamikájára [The effect of demand on the dynamics of prices, quality and development decisions]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1094-1115.
    4. Voros, Jozsef, 1999. "Lot sizing with quality improvement and setup time reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 568-574, March.
    5. Williams, William W. & Tang, Kwei & Gong, Linguo, 2000. "Process improvement for a container-filling process with random shifts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 23-31, June.
    6. Morrison, J. Bradley, 2008. "Putting the learning curve in context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(11), pages 1182-1190, November.
    7. Fernando Bernstein & A. Gürhan Kök, 2009. "Dynamic Cost Reduction Through Process Improvement in Assembly Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 552-567, April.
    8. Christopher D. Ittner & Venky Nagar & Madhav V. Rajan, 2001. "An Empirical Examination of Dynamic Quality-Based Learning Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 563-578, April.
    9. J-C Tsou & J-M Chen, 2005. "Dynamic model for a defective production system with Poka-Yoke," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(7), pages 799-803, July.
    10. Paulson Gjerde, Kathy A. & Slotnick, Susan A., 2004. "Quality and reputation: The effects of external and internal factors over time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Voros, Jozsef, 2019. "An analysis of the dynamic price-quality relationship," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1037-1045.
    12. Yimin Wang & Wendell Gilland & Brian Tomlin, 2010. "Mitigating Supply Risk: Dual Sourcing or Process Improvement?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 489-510, September.
    13. Janice E. Carrillo & Cheryl Gaimon, 2004. "Managing Knowledge-Based Resource Capabilities Under Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1504-1518, November.
    14. Linguo Gong & James Pruett & Kwei Tang, 1997. "A Markovian model for process setup and improvement," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 383-400, June.
    15. Vörös, József, 2013. "Multi-period models for analyzing the dynamics of process improvement activities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 615-623.
    16. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Coates, Eyler Robert, 1997. "Manufacturing setup cost reduction under variable lead times and finite opportunities for investment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 237-247, May.
    17. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2003. "Lot sizing with learning and forgetting in set-ups and in product quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 95-111, January.
    18. Kim, Bowon, 1996. "Learning-induced control model to allocate managerial resources for production technology development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 267-282, June.
    19. Fehmi Tanrısever & S. Sinan Erzurumlu & Nitin Joglekar, 2012. "Production, Process Investment, and the Survival of Debt‐Financed Startup Firms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 21(4), pages 637-652, July.
    20. Ying-Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2017. "Dual Coproduct Technologies: Implications for Process Development and Adoption," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 692-712, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D - Microeconomics
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • C62 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Existence and Stability Conditions of Equilibrium

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.