IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/1144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tudományos fokozattal rendelkező fiatal biológusok munkahelyi orientációja
[The workplace orientation of young biologists with postgraduate degrees]

Author

Listed:
  • Mosoniné Fried, Judit
  • Pálinkó, Éva
  • Soós, Sándor

Abstract

A kutatói életpálya legmeghatározóbb szakasza a doktori fokozat megszerzését követő hat-nyolc év. Az ezen időszakot vizsgáló nemzetközi kutatások két fontos tényre hívják fel a figyelmet. Egyfelől arra, hogy az egyetemi és a kutatóintézeti munkahelyek száma lassabban nő, mint a doktorok száma, emiatt érdemes már a képzés idején diverzifikált életpályában gondolkodni. Másfelől empirikus vizsgálatokból az is kiderült, hogy nincs szó "elveszett generációról" a fiatal doktoráltak esetében: a felsőoktatáson kívüli közszféra, a magánszektor vagy a nonprofit szektor akár a PhD-fokozattal rendelkezők 50-60 százalékának is képes megfelelő pozíciót és feladatot biztosítani. Kutatásunk a vártnál sokkal kevésbé tárt fel új munkaerő-piaci tendenciákat az 1993 után PhD-fokozatot szerzett biológus kutatók esetében. Eredményeink szerint Magyarországon még közel 70 százalékban a felsőoktatásban vagy az MTA kutatóhálózatában (együtt: akadémiai szektor) helyezkednek el a frissen doktoráltak, és a legfontosabb alternatíva nem az üzleti szektor, hanem a külföldi munkahely választása. A különböző szervezeti típusokban való munkavállalás valószínűségét próbáltuk meg modellezni. A kis minta ellenére jól látható, hogy az akadémiai karriertípus vizsgált tényezői határozottan különböznek a magánszférában dolgozó típuséitól.* Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: C11, C19, J49.

Suggested Citation

  • Mosoniné Fried, Judit & Pálinkó, Éva & Soós, Sándor, 2010. "Tudományos fokozattal rendelkező fiatal biológusok munkahelyi orientációja [The workplace orientation of young biologists with postgraduate degrees]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 71-90.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=1144
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mangematin, V., 2000. "PhD job market: professional trajectories and incentives during the PhD," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 741-756, June.
    2. Laudeline Auriol, 2007. "Labour Market Characteristics and International Mobility of Doctorate Holders: Results for Seven Countries," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2007/2, OECD Publishing.
    3. Dietz, James S. & Bozeman, Barry, 2005. "Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 349-367, April.
    4. Rosenberg, Nathan & Nelson, Richard R., 1994. "American universities and technical advance in industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 323-348, May.
    5. Jeroen Huisman & Egbert de Weert & Jeroen Bartelse, 2002. "Academic Careers from a European Perspective," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 141-160, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Fritsch & Stefan Krabel, 2012. "Ready to leave the ivory tower?: Academic scientists’ appeal to work in the private sector," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 271-296, June.
    2. Massimiliano Tani, 2022. "Same degree but different outcomes: an analysis of labour market outcomes for native and international PhD students in Australia," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 56(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Fernandez-Zubieta, Ana & Geuna, Aldo & Lawson, Cornelia, 2015. "What do We Know of the Mobility of Research Scientists and of its Impact on Scientific Production," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201522, University of Turin.
    4. Uwe Cantner & Martin Kalthaus & Indira Yarullina, 2024. "Outcomes of science-industry collaboration: factors and interdependencies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 542-580, April.
    5. Herrera, Liliana & Nieto, Mariano, 2015. "The determinants of firms' PhD recruitment to undertake R&D activities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 132-142.
    6. Herrera, Liliana & Nieto, Mariano, 2016. "PhD careers in Spanish industry: Job determinants in manufacturing versus non-manufacturing firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 341-351.
    7. Geuna, Aldo & Kataishi, Rodrigo & Toselli, Manuel & Guzmán, Eduardo & Lawson, Cornelia & Fernandez-Zubieta, Ana & Barros, Beatriz, 2015. "SiSOB data extraction and codification: A tool to analyze scientific careers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(9), pages 1645-1658.
    8. Magnus Gulbrandsen & Taran Thune, 2017. "The effects of non-academic work experience on external interaction and research performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 795-813, August.
    9. Donna Kidwell, 2014. "Navigating the role of the principal investigator: a comparison of four cases," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 33-51, February.
    10. Carolina Cañibano & Richard Woolley & Eric J. Iversen & Sybille Hinze & Stefan Hornbostel & Jakob Tesch, 2019. "A conceptual framework for studying science research careers," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1964-1992, December.
    11. Shmatko, Natalia & Katchanov, Yurij & Volkova, Galina, 2020. "The value of PhD in the changing world of work: Traditional and alternative research careers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Bianchini, Stefano & Llerena, Patrick & Patsali, Sofia, 2019. "Demand-pull innovation in science: Empirical evidence from a research university’s suppliers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(S).
    13. repec:cte:wsrepe:ws132824 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Baruffaldi, Stefano H. & Di Maio, Giorgio & Landoni, Paolo, 2017. "Determinants of PhD holders’ use of social networking sites: An analysis based on LinkedIn," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 740-750.
    15. Takao Furukawa & Nobuyuki Shirakawa & Kumi Okuwada & Kazuya Sasaki, 2012. "International mobility of researchers in robotics, computer vision and electron devices: A quantitative and comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(1), pages 185-202, April.
    16. Ozgur Aydogmus & Erkan Gürpinar, 2022. "Science, Technology and Institutional Change in Knowledge Production: An Evolutionary Game Theoretic Framework," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1163-1188, December.
    17. Muhammad Ajmal Khan, 2023. "Dire or Dying Demand for the Government Job: Analysing A PhD Holder’s Future Prospects," PIDE-Working Papers 2023:3, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    18. Junfu Zhang, 2006. "A Study of Academic Entrepreneurs Using Venture Capital Data," PPIC Working Papers 2006.01, Public Policy Institute of California.
    19. Lawson, Cornelia & Geuna, Aldo & Ana Fernández-Zubieta & Toselli, Manuel & Kataishi, Rodrigo, 2015. "International Careers of Researchers in Biomedical Sciences: A Comparison of the US and the UK," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201514, University of Turin.
    20. Sidia Moreno Rojas & Agueda García Carrillo, 2014. "Sistema para la evaluación de capacidades de innovación en pymes de países en desarrollo: caso Panamá," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 0(2), pages 109-122, December.
    21. Francisco Más-Verdú & Jose Polo Otero & José García Quevedo, 2010. "Which firms want PhDs? The effect of the university-industry relationship on the PhD labour market," Working Papers 2010R02, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • C19 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Other
    • J49 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.