IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v37y1991i11p1452-1473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive Strategies for Two Firms with Asymmetric Production Cost Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Jehoshua Eliashberg

    (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Richard Steinberg

    (Operations Research Department, AT&T Bell Laboratories, HO 3J-301, Crawfords Corner Road, Holmdel, New Jersey 07733)

Abstract

We model joint production-marketing strategies for two firms with asymmetric production cost structures in competition. The first firm, called the "Production-smoother," faces a convex production cost and a linear inventory holding cost. The second firm, called the "Order-taker," faces a linear production cost and holds no inventory. Each firm is assumed to vary continuously over time both its production rate and its price in view of an unstable "surge" pattern of demand. The underlying theoretical motivation is to investigate the temporal nature of the equilibrium policies of two competing firms, one operating at or near capacity (the Production-smoother), and one operating significantly below capacity (the Order-taker). We characterize and compare the equilibrium strategies of the two competing firms. Among our results, we show that if the duopolistic Production-smoother finds it optimal to hold inventory, then he will begin the season by building up inventory, continue by drawing down inventory until it reaches zero, and conclude by following a "zero inventory" policy until the end of the season. This result, which is robust with respect to the market structure, is compared with a monopolistic Production-smoother policy. We also show that due to the "coupling" effect between the two competing firms, the time at which the Production-smoother begins his zero inventory policy is also critical for the Order-taker who divides his production and pricing strategies into two parts determined by the Production-smoother's zero inventory point. Numerical examples that illustrate certain aspects of our analyses are provided as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Jehoshua Eliashberg & Richard Steinberg, 1991. "Competitive Strategies for Two Firms with Asymmetric Production Cost Structures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(11), pages 1452-1473, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:37:y:1991:i:11:p:1452-1473
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.37.11.1452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.11.1452
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.37.11.1452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Glen M. Schmidt & Evan L. Porteus, 2000. "The Impact of an Integrated Marketing and Manufacturing Innovation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 317-336, April.
    2. Rajiv D. Banker & Inder Khosla & Kingshuk K. Sinha, 1998. "Quality and Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(9), pages 1179-1192, September.
    3. Ravi Kumar, K. & Hadjinicola, George C., 1996. "Resource allocation to defensive marketing and manufacturing strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 453-466, November.
    4. Lin, Pei-Chun, 2008. "Optimal pricing, production rate, and quality under learning effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(11), pages 1152-1159, November.
    5. Didem Demirhan & Varghese S. Jacob & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2007. "Strategic IT Investments: The Impact of Switching Cost and Declining IT Cost," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 208-226, February.
    6. Daozhi Zhao & Zhibao Li, 2018. "The impact of manufacturer’s encroachment and nonlinear production cost on retailer’s information sharing decisions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 264(1), pages 499-539, May.
    7. Ryan Donnelly & Zi Li, 2022. "Dynamic Inventory Management with Mean-Field Competition," Papers 2210.17208, arXiv.org.
    8. Xiong‐zhi Wang & Guo‐qing Wang, 2019. "Integrating dynamic pricing and inventory control for fresh‐agri product under consumer choice," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 96-111, March.
    9. Steffen Jørgensen, 2011. "Intertemporal Contracting in a Supply Chain," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 280-300, June.
    10. Ravi Kumar, K. & Loomba, Arvinder P. S. & Hadjinicola, George C., 2000. "Marketing-production coordination in channels of distribution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 189-217, October.
    11. Weixin Shang & Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong, 2016. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with a Common Retailer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 245-263, January.
    12. Transchel, Sandra & Minner, Stefan, 2011. "Economic lot-sizing and dynamic quantity competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 416-422, September.
    13. Kim, Bowon & Park, Sangsun, 2008. "Optimal pricing, EOL (end of life) warranty, and spare parts manufacturing strategy amid product transition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(3), pages 723-745, August.
    14. Zhang, Jianqiang & He, Xiuli, 2019. "Targeted advertising by asymmetric firms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 136-150.
    15. Sreekumar Bhaskaran & Karthik Ramachandran & John Semple, 2010. "A Dynamic Inventory Model with the Right of Refusal," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(12), pages 2265-2281, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:37:y:1991:i:11:p:1452-1473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.