IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcallt/v11y2021i2p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students' Attitudes and Preferences Towards Google Docs as a Collaborative Writing Platform

Author

Listed:
  • Kok Yueh Lee

    (Universiti Teknologi Brunei, Brunei)

  • David Geraint Hassell

    (University of Bath, UK)

Abstract

This paper presents findings on the application of Google Docs as a collaborative writing platform for a research report assignment. Based on a mixed method study, 34 first year students were put into eight groups of four to five and tasked with writing a research report. Four groups adopted Google Docs to discuss and develop the assignment whilst the other four groups adopted a more traditional face-to-face approach. Two sets of questionnaires, pre and post to the assignment, were distributed to investigate students' attitude and preference towards both approaches. Findings indicate that students shared mixed feelings towards Google Docs where students without prior experience found it a positive experience and useful for their learning. Students preferred the real-time accessibility and time-saving features of the platform as compared to face-to-face, with results indicating that a blended approach of online and face-to-face meetings is the best approach to maximise student learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Kok Yueh Lee & David Geraint Hassell, 2021. "Students' Attitudes and Preferences Towards Google Docs as a Collaborative Writing Platform," International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), IGI Global, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcallt:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:1-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJCALLT.2021040101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcallt:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.