IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijassi/v10y2023i3p243-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic analysis of an unreliable batch service retrial queueing system with two sort of vacation

Author

Listed:
  • S.P. Niranjan
  • K. Indhira
  • V.M. Chandrasekaran

Abstract

This paper concentrates on bulk arrival and batch service retrial queueing system with server failure, two types of vacation and constant retrial rate. If an arrival of customers finds a server is free then batch service will be provided with minimum of one customers and maximum of 'b' customers. On the contrary, if the arrival of customers finds the server is busy then entire customers will join in the orbit to explore service again. After service completion, if there are no customers in the orbit then the server leaves for working vacation. During working vacation, the server provides service in lower service rate compared to regular service rate. In the working vacation completion, if the orbit size is zero then the server leaves for non-working vacation. The server may get failure in working period. If the server got failure with probability (φ) then the renewal of service station will be considered. On the other hand, if there is no breakdown and orbit is empty then the server leaves for working vacation with probability (1 - φ). For this designed queueing model probability generating function of the orbit size will be obtained. Various performance measures are also be derived with suitable numerical illustrations.

Suggested Citation

  • S.P. Niranjan & K. Indhira & V.M. Chandrasekaran, 2023. "Systematic analysis of an unreliable batch service retrial queueing system with two sort of vacation," International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 243-264.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijassi:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:243-264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=134361
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijassi:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:243-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=205 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.