IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p4097-d1394076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mediating Role of Corporate Governance in the Relationship between Net Profit and Equity and Voluntary Disclosure in the Context of Legitimacy Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Talha Gezgin

    (Accounting and Tax Department, Vocational School of Social Sciences, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, 70100 Karaman, Turkey)

  • Gökhan Özer

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business Administration, Gebze Technical University, 41400 Gebze, Turkey)

  • Abdullah Kürşat Merter

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business Administration, Gebze Technical University, 41400 Gebze, Turkey)

  • Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu

    (Department of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Business Administration, Gebze Technical Unversity, 41400 Gebze, Turkey)

Abstract

Amidst ongoing global economic and environmental crises, the concept of legitimacy has gained paramount importance for firms, which must not only survive but also maintain their legitimacy through comprehensive disclosures. This study investigates the mediating role of corporate governance in shaping firm performance and voluntary disclosure, emphasizing sustainability implications. Analyzing 82 firms across various sectors in Turkey from 2010 to 2020, the research reveals no direct relationship between corporate governance and equity. However, it identifies a partial mediation effect of corporate governance on the disclosure of general, strategic, and forward-looking financial information related to net profit. Critically, our findings demonstrate that corporate governance fully mediates the relationship between net profit and the disclosure of social and board information, with the magnitude of this indirect effect being complete. This underscores the fact that robust corporate governance enhances transparency in social and environmental reporting, thereby supporting firms in their efforts to align with sustainable business practices and stakeholder expectations. These results highlight the crucial role of effective governance in ensuring comprehensive disclosures that support the sustainability goals of modern enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Talha Gezgin & Gökhan Özer & Abdullah Kürşat Merter & Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu, 2024. "The Mediating Role of Corporate Governance in the Relationship between Net Profit and Equity and Voluntary Disclosure in the Context of Legitimacy Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4097-:d:1394076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4097/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4097/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amama Shaukat & Yan Qiu & Grzegorz Trojanowski, 2016. "Board Attributes, Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy, and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 569-585, May.
    2. Neu, D. & Warsame, H. & Pedwell, K., 1998. "Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 265-282, April.
    3. Arifur Khan & Mohammad Muttakin & Javed Siddiqui, 2013. "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 207-223, May.
    4. David J. Campbell, 2000. "Legitimacy Theory or Managerial Reality Construction? Corporate Social Disclosure in Marks and Spencer Plc Corporate Reports, 1969–1997," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 80-100, March.
    5. Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Khaldoon Albitar & Atm Enayet Karim & Ahmed Saber Moussa, 2021. "COVID-19 Disclosure: A Novel Measurement and Annual Report Uncertainty," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Janet Luft Mobus, 2005. "Mandatory environmental disclosures in a legitimacy theory context," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(4), pages 492-517, August.
    7. Mark H. Lang & Russell J. Lundholm, 2000. "Voluntary Disclosure and Equity Offerings: Reducing Information Asymmetry or Hyping the Stock?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 623-662, December.
    8. Haiyan Jiang & Ahsan Habib, 2009. "The impact of different types of ownership concentration on annual report voluntary disclosures in New Zealand," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(3), pages 275-304, November.
    9. Vanessa Magness, 2006. "Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical test of legitimacy theory," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(4), pages 540-563, July.
    10. Patten, Dennis M., 1992. "Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 471-475, July.
    11. MuiChing Chan & John Watson & David Woodliff, 2014. "Corporate Governance Quality and CSR Disclosures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 59-73, November.
    12. Qiang Cheng & Kin Lo, 2006. "Insider Trading and Voluntary Disclosures," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 815-848, December.
    13. Grigoris Giannarakis, 2014. "Corporate governance and financial characteristic effects on the extent of corporate social responsibility disclosure," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(4), pages 569-590, September.
    14. Peter Collett & Sue Hrasky, 2005. "Voluntary Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices by Listed Australian Companies," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 188-196, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Abdul Kaium Masud & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Seong Mi Bae, 2018. "The effects of corporate governance on environmental sustainability reporting: empirical evidence from South Asian countries," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Hamed, Ruba Subhi & Al-Shattarat, Basiem Khalil & Al-Shattarat, Wasim Khalil & Hussainey, Khaled, 2022. "The impact of introducing new regulations on the quality of CSR reporting: Evidence from the UK," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    3. Tzu-Kuan Chiu & Yi-Hsin Wang, 2015. "Determinants of Social Disclosure Quality in Taiwan: An Application of Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 379-398, June.
    4. Wenyuan Liu & Ting Ren & Weishan Tang, 2021. "Teachers in the Top Management Team and Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Giovanna Gavana & Pietro Gottardo & Anna Maria Moisello, 2016. "Sustainability Reporting in Family Firms: A Panel Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Waris Ali & Jedrzej George Frynas & Zeeshan Mahmood, 2017. "Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 273-294, July.
    7. Naima Lassoued & Imen Khanchel, 2023. "Voluntary CSR disclosure and CEO narcissism: the moderating role of CEO duality and board gender diversity," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1075-1123, April.
    8. Perera, Luckmika & Jubb, Christine & Gopalan, Sandeep, 2019. "A comparison of voluntary and mandated climate change-related disclosure," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 243-266.
    9. Amel Ben Rhouma, 2006. "Mesure De La Qualite De La Divulgation Societale Des Entreprises Francaises," Post-Print halshs-00548088, HAL.
    10. X. Meng & S. Zeng & C. Tam, 2013. "From Voluntarism to Regulation: A Study on Ownership, Economic Performance and Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 217-232, August.
    11. Nicola Cucari & Salvatore Esposito De Falco & Beatrice Orlando, 2018. "Diversity of Board of Directors and Environmental Social Governance: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 250-266, May.
    12. Priti Yadav & Anshul Jain, 2023. "Sustainability disclosures and corporate boards: a stakeholder approach to decision-making," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(5), pages 1027-1047, April.
    13. Cho, Charles H. & Roberts, Robin W. & Patten, Dennis M., 2010. "The language of US corporate environmental disclosure," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 431-443, May.
    14. P. Fahad & P. Mubarak Rahman, 2020. "Impact of corporate governance on CSR disclosure," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 155-167, September.
    15. Mehmoona Sharif & Kashif Rashid, 2014. "Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: an empirical evidence from commercial banks (CB) of Pakistan," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2501-2521, September.
    16. Seong Mi Bae & Md. Abdul Kaium Masud & Jong Dae Kim, 2018. "A Cross-Country Investigation of Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainability Disclosure: A Signaling Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Elizabeth Stanny, 2013. "Voluntary Disclosures of Emissions by US Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 145-158, March.
    18. Muttakin, Mohammad Badrul & Khan, Arifur, 2014. "Determinants of corporate social disclosure: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 168-175.
    19. Pamela Kent & Tamara Zunker, 2017. "A stakeholder analysis of employee disclosures in annual reports," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(2), pages 533-563, June.
    20. Matthias S. Fifka, 2013. "Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective – a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta‐analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 1-35, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4097-:d:1394076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.