IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3751-d354329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Future of Smallholder Farming in India: Some Sustainability Considerations

Author

Listed:
  • Ishwari Singh Bisht

    (The Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, NASC Complex, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Jai Chand Rana

    (The Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, NASC Complex, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Sudhir Pal Ahlawat

    (ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India)

Abstract

The biodiverse, predominantly crop-livestock mixed-farming in India is key to ensuring resilience to climate change and sustainability of smallholder farming agroecologies. Farmers traditionally grow diverse crops as polyculture, and agriculture is mainly organic/biodynamic with spirituality in food systems deeply ingrained. Job-driven out-migration of rural youths, the family labor force, and globalization of contemporary food choices under corporate industrial agriculture both adversely affect sustainability of traditional farming landscapes and compromise the nutrition and health of rural farming communities. Besides documenting information on general agri-food system policy inputs, our paper presents the results of an exploratory study of four crucial community-level initiatives conducted in four distinct agroecological landscapes of India, aimed at bringing sustainability to traditional farming and food systems. The driving force for fundamental change in agri-food system, and in society, is the question of sustainability. The organic and local food movements are but specific phases of the larger, more fundamental sustainable agri-food movement. While it is very critical to increase farmer livelihood, it is even more important to increase overall rural economy. It was found that four important interventions viz. linking organic agriculture to community-supported agriculture (CSA) initiatives; linking small-holder farming to school meal (MDM) programmes; enhanced market access and value chain development for local agricultural produce; and creation of employment opportunities at community level for rural youths and reducing over-dependence of rural population on agriculture as source of income can make traditional farming more profitable and sustainable. The transition to more sustainable methods of farming by selling the farm produce “locally” helps both consumers and farmers alike and is considered a future strength of smallholder Indian agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Ishwari Singh Bisht & Jai Chand Rana & Sudhir Pal Ahlawat, 2020. "The Future of Smallholder Farming in India: Some Sustainability Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3751-:d:354329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3751/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3751/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tegtmeier, Erin & Duffy, Michael, 2005. "Community Supported Agriculture (Csa) in the Midwest United States: A Regional Characterization," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12577, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Miguel A. Altieri & Clara I. Nicholls & Rene Montalba, 2017. "Technological Approaches to Sustainable Agriculture at a Crossroads: An Agroecological Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Hanf, Jon H. & Gagalyuk, Taras, 2018. "Integration of Small Farmers into Value Chains: Evidence from Eastern Europe and Central Asia," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 181-197.
    4. Jon H. Hanf & Taras Gagalyuk, 2018. "Integration of Small Farmers into Value Chains: Evidence from Eastern Europe and Central Asia," Chapters, in: Gokhan Egilmez (ed.), Agricultural Value Chain, IntechOpen.
    5. Lipy Adhikari & Sabarnee Tuladhar & Abid Hussain & Kamal Aryal, 2019. "Are Traditional Food Crops Really ‘Future Smart Foods?’ A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniela Ribeiro & Matija Zorn, 2021. "Sustainability and Slovenian Karst Landscapes: Evaluation of a Low Karst Plain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Sophie de Bruin & Just Denerink & Pritpal Randhawa & Idrissa Wade & Hester Biemans & Christian Siderius, 2022. "IFAD Research Series 71: Urbanizing food systems: exploring opportunities for rural transformation," IFAD Research Series 320721, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    3. Dey, Sagarika, 2020. "Agricultural Skilling and Its Impact on Agricultural Commercialisation, Crop Diversification and Employment Choice of Small Holder Agricultural Households: A Study Based on 70th Round of NSSO," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), December.
    4. Addisu Raga & Fekadu Beyene & Jema Haji & Chanyalew Siyum, 2024. "Determinants of Smallholder Farmers' About Choices of Sustainable Land Management Practices in West Wollega Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-74, April.
    5. Bożena Kusz & Dariusz Kusz & Iwona Bąk & Maciej Oesterreich & Ludwik Wicki & Grzegorz Zimon, 2022. "Selected Economic Determinants of Labor Profitability in Family Farms in Poland in Relation to Economic Size," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    6. Olha Kravchenko & Anatolii Kucher & Maria Hełdak & Lesia Kucher & Joanna Wysmułek, 2020. "Socio-Economic Transformations in Ukraine towards the Sustainable Development of Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Erna S. Macusi & Anthony C. Sales & Edison D. Macusi & Henzel P. Bongas & Melanie A. Cayacay & Juber L. Omandam & Marthje Schüler & Camila Vidal, 2023. "Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Practices (IKSPs), Livelihood Resources and Aspirations of the Matigsalog and Ata Tribes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Jai Chand Rana & Ishwari Singh Bisht, 2023. "Reviving Smallholder Hill Farming by Involving Rural Youth in Food System Transformation and Promoting Community-Based Agri-Ecotourism: A Case of Uttarakhand State in North-Western India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, May.
    9. Saroj, Sunil & Pradhan, Mamata & Boss, Ruchira & Roy, Devesh, 2022. "Roles of rural non-farm employment (RNFE) in India: Why RNFE, the conveyor of a shock like COVID 19 is also the key to recovery?," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    10. Raghu, Prabhakaran T & Das, Sukanya & Veettil, Prakashan Chellattan, 2021. "Smallholder Adaptation to Flood Risks: Adoption and Impact of Swarna-Sub1 in Eastern India," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315867, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Amanda Souza & Armando Fornazier, 2022. "Case Study of the School Feeding Program in Distrito Federal, Brazil: Building Quality in Short Food Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Bayu Dwi Anggono & Rofi Wahanisa & Cairin Melina, 2023. "Determinants of Sustainable Land Use Change in Agricultural Utilization and Environmental Performance," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 545-551, May.
    13. Pagare, Dewang & Biswas, Indranil & Agrahari, Amit & Ghosh, Sriparna, 2023. "A small farmer’s market choice in the presence of multiple markets: The Indian case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 739-753.
    14. Ceballos, Francisco & Kannan, Samyuktha & Kramer, Berber, 2020. "Impacts of a national lockdown on smallholder farmers’ income and food security: Empirical evidence from two states in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    15. Sophie Bruin & Just Dengerink & Jasper Vliet, 2021. "Urbanisation as driver of food system transformation and opportunities for rural livelihoods," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(4), pages 781-798, August.
    16. Francisco Ceballos & Samyuktha Kannan & Berber Kramer, 2021. "Crop prices, farm incomes, and food security during the COVID‐19 pandemic in India: Phone‐based producer survey evidence from Haryana State," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(3), pages 525-542, May.
    17. Walid Mukahhal & Gumataw Kifle Abebe & Rachel A. Bahn, 2022. "Opportunities and Challenges for Lebanese Horticultural Producers Linked to Corporate Buyers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Niraj Prakash Joshi & Luni Piya, 2021. "Food and Nutrient Supply from Organic Agriculture in the Least Developed Countries and North America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Rakeshkumar Mahto & Deepak Sharma & Reshma John & Chandrasekhar Putcha, 2021. "Agrivoltaics: A Climate-Smart Agriculture Approach for Indian Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jon H. Hanf & Silva Atoyan & Linda Bitsch & Taras Gagalyuk, 2019. "Supply chain networks in the Armenian agribusiness: Setting a benchmark," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 21(2), pages 359-378.
    2. Antoinette Pole & Margaret Gray, 2013. "Farming alone? What’s up with the “C” in community supported agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(1), pages 85-100, March.
    3. Andrea Colantoni & Lucia Recchia & Guido Bernabei & Mariateresa Cardarelli & Youssef Rouphael & Giuseppe Colla, 2017. "Analyzing the Environmental Impact of Chemically-Produced Protein Hydrolysate from Leather Waste vs. Enzymatically-Produced Protein Hydrolysate from Legume Grains," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-9, July.
    4. Matthew Hutcheson & Alec Morton & Shona Blair, 2024. "Exploring Perspectives on Agroecological Transition in Scotland with Critical Systems Heuristics," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 459-482, August.
    5. Sung Kyu Kim & Fiona Marshall & Neil M. Dawson, 2022. "Revisiting Rwanda’s agricultural intensification policy: benefits of embracing farmer heterogeneity and crop-livestock integration strategies," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(3), pages 637-656, June.
    6. Valentinov, Vladislav & Imami, Drini & Xhoxhi, Orjon, 2024. "Contract farming in transitional economies: A stakeholder theory perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(4), pages 633-649.
    7. Salladarré, Frédéric & Guillotreau, Patrice & Debucquet, Gervaise & Lazuech, Gilles, 2018. "Some Good Reasons for Buying Fish Exclusively From Community-Supported Fisheries: The Case of Yeu Island in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 172-180.
    8. Rachael D. Garrett & Meredith Niles & Juliana Gil & Philip Dy & Julio Reis & Judson Valentim, 2017. "Policies for Reintegrating Crop and Livestock Systems: A Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Birthal, Pratap S. & Hazrana, Jaweriah & Roy, Devesh & Satyasai, K. J. S, 2024. "Can Finance Mitigate Climate Risks in Agriculture? Farm-level Evidence from India," Policy Papers 344992, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).
    10. Danuta Leszczyńska & Agnieszka Klimek-Kopyra & Krzysztof Patkowski, 2020. "Evaluation of the Productivity of New Spring Cereal Mixture to Optimize Cultivation under Different Soil Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    11. Matthew C. LaFevor & Aoife K. Pitts, 2022. "Irrigation Increases Crop Species Diversity in Low-Diversity Farm Regions of Mexico," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Conrad Baker & Albert Thembinkosi Modi & Adornis D. Nciizah, 2021. "Weeding Frequency Effects on Growth and Yield of Dry Bean Intercropped with Sweet Sorghum and Cowpea under a Dryland Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Xhoxhi, Orjon & Imami, Drini & Hanf, Jon & Gjokaj, Ekrem, 2022. "Too much power or no power: when does intermediary's power result into better wine and happier farmers?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(5), December.
    14. Rita Biasi & Roberta Farina & Elena Brunori, 2021. "Family Farming Plays an Essential Role in Preserving Soil Functionality: A Study on Active Managed and Abandoned Traditional Tree Crop-Based Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Susanne Wiesner & Alison J. Duff & Ankur R. Desai & Kevin Panke-Buisse, 2020. "Increasing Dairy Sustainability with Integrated Crop–Livestock Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Kiefer, Katharina & Kremer, Jasper & Zeitner, Philipp & Winkler, Bastian & Wagner, Moritz & von Cossel, Moritz, 2023. "Monetizing ecosystem services of perennial wild plant mixtures for bioenergy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    17. Cristiana Peano & Stefano Massaglia & Chiara Ghisalberti & Francesco Sottile, 2020. "Pathways for the Amplification of Agroecology in African Sustainable Urban Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, March.
    18. Horst, Megan & Gwin, Lauren, 2018. "Land access for direct market food farmers in Oregon, USA," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 594-611.
    19. Fernandez-Bou, Angel Santiago & Rodriguez-Flores, Jose M. & Ortiz-Partida, J. Pablo & Fencl, Amanda & Classen-Rodriguez, Leticia & Yang, Vivian & Williams, Emily & Schull, Val Zayden & Dobbin, Kristin, 2024. "Cropland repurposing as a tool for water sustainability and a just socioenvironmental transition in California: Review and Best Practices," OSF Preprints bvfsm, Center for Open Science.
    20. Hamid El Bilali, 2019. "The Multi-Level Perspective in Research on Sustainability Transitions in Agriculture and Food Systems: A Systematic Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-24, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3751-:d:354329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.