IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i10p1470-d1391261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slime Mould Algorithm Based on a Gaussian Mutation for Solving Constrained Optimization Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Gauri Thakur

    (Department of Mathematics, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India)

  • Ashok Pal

    (Department of Mathematics, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India)

  • Nitin Mittal

    (Department of Industry 4.0, Shri Vishwakarma Skill University, Palwal 121102, Haryana, India)

  • Asha Rajiv

    (Department of Physics & Electronics, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to Be University), Bangalore 560069, Karnataka, India)

  • Rohit Salgotra

    (Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
    MEU Research Unit, Middle East University, Amman 11813, Jordan)

Abstract

The slime mould algorithm may not be enough and tends to trap into local optima, low population diversity, and suffers insufficient exploitation when real-world optimization problems become more complex. To overcome the limitations of SMA, the Gaussian mutation (GM) with a novel strategy is proposed to enhance SMA and it is named as SMA-GM. The GM is used to increase population diversity, which helps SMA come out of local optima and retain a robust local search capability. Additionally, the oscillatory parameter is updated and incorporated with GM to set the balance between exploration and exploitation. By using a greedy selection technique, this study retains an optimal slime mould position while ensuring the algorithm’s rapid convergence. The SMA-GM performance was evaluated by using unconstrained, constrained, and CEC2022 benchmark functions. The results show that the proposed SMA-GM has a more robust capacity for global search, improved stability, a faster rate of convergence, and the ability to solve constrained optimization problems. Additionally, the Wilcoxon rank sum test illustrates that there is a significant difference between the optimization outcomes of SMA-GM and each compared algorithm. Furthermore, the engineering problem such as industrial refrigeration system (IRS), optimal operation of the alkylation unit problem, welded beam and tension/compression spring design problem are solved, and results prove that the proposed algorithm has a better optimization efficiency to reach the optimum value.

Suggested Citation

  • Gauri Thakur & Ashok Pal & Nitin Mittal & Asha Rajiv & Rohit Salgotra, 2024. "Slime Mould Algorithm Based on a Gaussian Mutation for Solving Constrained Optimization Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-37, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:10:p:1470-:d:1391261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/10/1470/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/10/1470/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Caiyang & Cai, Zhennao & Ye, Xiaojia & Wang, Mingjing & Zhao, Xuehua & Liang, Guoxi & Chen, Huiling & Li, Chengye, 2020. "Quantum-like mutation-induced dragonfly-inspired optimization approach," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 259-289.
    2. Martin Schlüter & Matthias Gerdts, 2010. "The oracle penalty method," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 293-325, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalyanmoy Deb & Soumil Srivastava, 2012. "A genetic algorithm based augmented Lagrangian method for constrained optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 869-902, December.
    2. Teichgraeber, Holger & Brodrick, Philip G. & Brandt, Adam R., 2017. "Optimal design and operations of a flexible oxyfuel natural gas plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 506-518.
    3. Eryang Guo & Yuelin Gao & Chenyang Hu & Jiaojiao Zhang, 2023. "A Hybrid PSO-DE Intelligent Algorithm for Solving Constrained Optimization Problems Based on Feasibility Rules," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-34, January.
    4. Nikolaos Ploskas & Nikolaos V. Sahinidis, 2022. "Review and comparison of algorithms and software for mixed-integer derivative-free optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 433-462, March.
    5. Maen Z. Kreishan & Ahmed F. Zobaa, 2023. "Scenario-Based Uncertainty Modeling for Power Management in Islanded Microgrid Using the Mixed-Integer Distributed Ant Colony Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-30, May.
    6. Umesh Balande & Deepti Shrimankar, 2020. "An oracle penalty and modified augmented Lagrangian methods with firefly algorithm for constrained optimization problems," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 985-1010, June.
    7. Maen Z. Kreishan & Ahmed F. Zobaa, 2022. "Mixed-Integer Distributed Ant Colony Optimization of Dump Load Allocation with Improved Islanded Microgrid Load Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-30, December.
    8. J. Gago-Vargas & I. Hartillo & J. Puerto & J. Ucha, 2015. "An improved test set approach to nonlinear integer problems with applications to engineering design," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 565-588, November.
    9. Qiao Zhao & Mounir Mecheri & Thibaut Neveux & Romain Privat & Jean-Noël Jaubert & Yann Le Moullec, 2023. "Search for the Optimal Design of a Supercritical-CO 2 Brayton Power Cycle from a Superstructure-Based Approach Implemented in a Commercial Simulation Software," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-31, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:10:p:1470-:d:1391261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.