IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i5p195-d1391922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Turnover by Non-CEO Executives in Top Management Teams and Escalation of Commitment

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitriy Chulkov

    (School of Business, Indiana University, 2300 S Washington St, Kokomo, IN 46902, USA)

Abstract

This article investigates the relationship between the decision-making bias known as escalation of commitment and the turnover of non-CEO executives in top management teams. The phenomenon of escalation of commitment is observed when decision makers persist with business investments that have a low likelihood of success. Theoretical explanations for the association between executive turnover and escalation include self-justification and reputation protection. Top managers may conceal prior errors, escalate commitment to earlier decisions, and exit the organization before the outcome of decisions is observed. Successor managers do not have a commitment to earlier decisions and have the capability to stop investments that are discovered to be failing. Empirical analysis utilizing a sample of over 1600 U.S. firms confirms that departures by non-CEO executives from top management teams are associated with an increased likelihood of new reporting of discontinued operations and extraordinary items by firms and a reduction in the firms’ performances relative to their industry. These effects reflect de-escalation activities and are amplified in the years concurrent with and following a joint departure of multiple management team members. Prior empirical studies on escalation and de-escalation behavior focused on CEO turnover. The contribution of this article is its documenting of the key role of non-CEO managers and team turnover in the context of escalation.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitriy Chulkov, 2024. "Turnover by Non-CEO Executives in Top Management Teams and Escalation of Commitment," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-11, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:195-:d:1391922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/5/195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/5/195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barron, John M. & Chulkov, Dmitriy V. & Waddell, Glen R., 2011. "Top management team turnover, CEO succession type, and strategic change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(8), pages 904-910, August.
    2. Dmitriy Chulkov & Xiaoqiong Wang, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and financial reporting quality: evidence from US firms," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(3), pages 445-466, January.
    3. Ann K. Buchholtz & Michael Lubatkin & Hugh O'Neill, 1999. "Seller Responsiveness to the need to divest," Post-Print hal-02311653, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Vidal & Will Mitchell, 2015. "Adding by Subtracting: The Relationship Between Performance Feedback and Resource Reconfiguration Through Divestitures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 1101-1118, August.
    2. Michelle L. Zorn & Kaitlyn DeGhetto & David J. Ketchen & James G. Combs, 2020. "The impact of hiring directors' choice‐supportive bias and escalation of commitment on CEO compensation and dismissal following poor performance: A multimethod study," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 308-339, February.
    3. Colak, Gonul & Liljeblom, Eva, 2022. "Easy cleanups or forbearing improvements: The effect of CEO tenure on successor’s performance," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Xin Liu, 2023. "Fear to lose? An analysis of CEO successors’ decision-making regarding R&D intensity based on behavioral agency theory," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 403-430, February.
    5. Yao, Wenyun & Yang, Hang & Shi, Xiulian & Song, Zilong, 2024. "Top management team stability and debt concentration," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Humphreys, Brad & Paul, Rodney & Weinbach, Andrew, 2011. "CEO Turnover: More Evidence on the Role of Performance Expectations," Working Papers 2011-14, University of Alberta, Department of Economics.
    7. Wang, Qiping & Lau, Raymond Yiu Keung & Xie, Haoran, 2021. "The impact of social executives on firms’ mergers and acquisitions strategies: A difference-in-differences analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 343-354.
    8. Choi, Seungho & Xu, Jing, 2022. "What do boards consider in CEO performance evaluation? Evidence from executive turnover," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    9. Jing Wu & Hao Li & Keyang Li, 2020. "Local political chief turnover and economic growth: Evidence from China," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 441-466, July.
    10. Chung, Huimin & Judge, William Q. & Li, Yi-Hua, 2015. "Voluntary disclosure, excess executive compensation, and firm value," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 64-90.
    11. Henning Behr & Kerstin Fehre, 2019. "CEO succession and the CEO’s commitment to the status quo," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 355-381, December.
    12. Yijing Wang & Guido Berens, 2015. "The Impact of Four Types of Corporate Social Performance on Reputation and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 337-359, October.
    13. Tang, Tanya (Ya) & Fisher, Gregory J. & Qualls, William, 2016. "Interfirm alliance configuration as a strategy to reduce shareholder risks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1199-1207.
    14. Won-Yong Oh & Young Kyun Chang & Zheng Cheng, 2016. "When CEO Career Horizon Problems Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Roles of Industry-Level Discretion and Blockholder Ownership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 279-291, January.
    15. Shenggang Ren & Yue Wang & Yucai Hu & Ji Yan, 2021. "CEO hometown identity and firm green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 756-774, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:195-:d:1391922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.