IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i4p172-d1380366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do ESG Factors Prove Significant Predictors of Systematic and Downside Risks in the Russian Market after Controlling for Stock Liquidity?

Author

Listed:
  • Tamara Teplova

    (Centre for Financial Research & Data Analytics, HSE University, 109028 Moscow, Russia)

  • Tatiana Sokolova

    (Centre for Financial Research & Data Analytics, HSE University, 109028 Moscow, Russia)

  • Sergei Gurov

    (Centre for Financial Research & Data Analytics, HSE University, 109028 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

This paper reveals the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores on systematic and downside risks in the Russian stock market. We analyze the influence of a broad set of ESG factors controlling for stock liquidity, financial indicators of companies, and macroeconomic indicators. The period under consideration is from 2013 to 2021. The methodology of our research is based on regression analysis with multiplicative variables to reveal the changes induced by the COVID-19 pandemic. We obtain several novel results. Social responsibility is one of the most significant non-fundamental factors influencing both systematic and downside risks. The most important environment-related component is the measure of a company’s propensity to environmental innovations. Some dimensions of stock liquidity are also significant. For some factors, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and debt burden, we find an unexpected direction of influence on liquidity.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamara Teplova & Tatiana Sokolova & Sergei Gurov, 2024. "Do ESG Factors Prove Significant Predictors of Systematic and Downside Risks in the Russian Market after Controlling for Stock Liquidity?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:172-:d:1380366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/4/172/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/4/172/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Feng & Ding, Cong & Yue, Wei & Liu, Guanchun, 2023. "ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Camilleri, Silvio John & Scicluna, Nicolanne & Bai, Ye, 2019. "Do stock markets lead or lag macroeconomic variables? Evidence from select European countries," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 170-186.
    3. Aastvedt, Tonje Marthinsen & Behmiri, Niaz Bashiri & Lu, Li, 2021. "Does green innovation damage financial performance of oil and gas companies?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Andreas G F Hoepner & Ioannis Oikonomou & Zacharias Sautner & Laura T Starks & Xiao Y Zhou, 2024. "ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 28(2), pages 483-510.
    5. Liu, Hao & Zhang, Hao & Gao, Ya-Chun & Chen, Xu-Dong, 2022. "Firm age and beta: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 244-261.
    6. Qian, Kun & Shi, Bingjie & Song, Yunling & Wu, Hao, 2023. "ESG performance and loan contracting in an emerging market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Dao Van Hung & Nguyen Thi Minh Hue & Vu Thuy Duong, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Stock Market Returns in Vietnam," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan, Xiujie & Yan, Yaxue & Dong, Yuyang, 2022. "Peer effect in green credit induced green innovation: An empirical study from China's Green Credit Guidelines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Chen, Pengyu & Chu, Zhongzhu & Zhao, Miao, 2024. "The Road to corporate sustainability: The importance of artificial intelligence," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Li, Ping & Wang, Kai & Zhang, Junping, 2023. "Does the inclusion of Chinese A-shares in the MSCI EM index promote ESG performance?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    4. Teplova, Tamara & Sokolova, Tatiana & Kissa, David, 2023. "Revealing stock liquidity determinants by means of explainable AI: The role of ESG before and during the COVID-19 pandemic," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    5. Deng, Hong & Li, You & Lin, Yongjia, 2023. "Green financial policy and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    6. Xing, Lu & Han, DongHao & Hui, Xie, 2023. "The impact of carbon policy on corporate risk-taking with a double/debiased machine learning based difference-in-differences approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    7. He, Feng & Feng, Yaqian & Hao, Jing, 2023. "Corporate ESG rating and stock market liquidity: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Linda Kusumaning Wedari & Amir Moradi‐Motlagh & Christine Jubb, 2023. "The moderating effect of innovation on the relationship between environmental and financial performance: Evidence from high emitters in Australia," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 654-672, January.
    9. Lin, Xiaowei & Li, Ao & Xu, Yonghao & Ding, Zijun, 2023. "Does internal whistleblowing build more socially responsible firms？," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 197-214.
    10. Seyed Alireza Athari & Chafic Saliba & Elsa Abboud & Nourhan El-Bayaa, 2024. "Examining the Quadratic Impact of Sovereign Environmental, Social, and Governance Practices on Firms’ Profitability: New Insights from the Financial Industry in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Yung-Fu Huang & Abbott Po-Shun Chen & Manh-Hoang Do & Jen-Chieh Chung, 2022. "Assessing the Barriers of Green Innovation Implementation: Evidence from the Vietnamese Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Liyuan Meng & Yuchen Zhang, 2023. "Impact of Tax Administration on ESG Performance—A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on China’s Golden Tax Project III," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Shi, Xianwang & Ma, Jianteng & Jiang, Anxuan & Wei, Shuang & Yue, Leilei, 2023. "Green bonds: Green investments or greenwashing?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Wang, Zhen & Chu, Erming & Hao, Yukai, 2024. "Towards sustainable development: How does ESG performance promotes corporate green transformation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    15. Farooq, Umar & Wen, Jun & Tabash, Mosab I. & Fadoul, Modawi, 2024. "Environmental regulations and capital investment: Does green innovation allow to grow?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 878-893.
    16. Diego Fresoli, 2022. "Bootstrap VAR forecasts: The effect of model uncertainties," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(2), pages 279-293, March.
    17. Chai, Shanglei & Cao, Mengjun & Li, Qiang & Ji, Qiang & Liu, Zuankuo, 2023. "Exploring the nexus between ESG disclosure and corporate sustainable growth: Moderating role of media attention," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    18. Hu, Jinyan & Wang, Kai-Hua & Su, Chi Wei & Umar, Muhammad, 2022. "Oil price, green innovation and institutional pressure: A China's perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    19. Fromentin, Vincent, 2022. "Time-varying causality between stock prices and macroeconomic fundamentals: Connection or disconnection?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    20. Stefanos Bennett & Mihai Cucuringu & Gesine Reinert, 2022. "Lead-lag detection and network clustering for multivariate time series with an application to the US equity market," Papers 2201.08283, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:172-:d:1380366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.