IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjopen/v2y2019i4p27-429d273200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SWOT Analysis of Blended Learning in Public Universities of Uganda: A Case Study of Muni University

Author

Listed:
  • Guma Ali

    (Department of Computer and Information Science, Muni University, Arua 00256, Uganda)

  • Bosco Apparatus Buruga

    (Library and Information Services, Muni University, Arua 00256, Uganda)

  • Taban Habibu

    (Department of Computer and Information Science, Muni University, Arua 00256, Uganda)

Abstract

With the fusion of information communication technology (ICT) in higher institutions of learning, new teaching and learning practices have developed—often called blended learning—allowing students and teachers to interact with information and each other more independently. This study, therefore, analyses the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of blended learning in the Public Universities of Uganda, in a case study of Muni University. Descriptive survey design was employed in the research. The target sample of the survey was 25 lecturers and 189 students selected using a stratified random sampling technique from the three faculties. A questionnaire was employed in this study and the data collected were analyzed using SPSS Version 25. The findings of the study identified accessibility, positive attitude, and knowledge and skills as the major motivators for blended learning. The strengths of blended learning found included serving many students in a short time, university readiness, connected both in and out of class, basic IT skills and top management commitment. The weaknesses included low bandwidth and unstable internet, lack of a plagiarism tool, insufficient numbers of computers and dependent on internet connectivity. Opportunities cited were competency-based systems that made it easier to manage individual progress in line with university expansion plans, an accessible way of learning regardless of location and available external support. The threats included unreliable power supply, unreliable internet connection, exchanges of username and passwords by students, internet shorthand used in student assignments. Based on these results, the study provides a baseline to help government and public universities that would like to implement or newly incorporate blended learning to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats associated with the blended learning approach. The survey urges that plagiarism plugins for Moodle and BigBlue Button should be added, steady power supply should be provided, internet accessibility should be improved, blended learning training and workshops need to be improved and finally, policies, rules and standards pertaining to blended learning should be enacted.

Suggested Citation

  • Guma Ali & Bosco Apparatus Buruga & Taban Habibu, 2019. "SWOT Analysis of Blended Learning in Public Universities of Uganda: A Case Study of Muni University," J, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjopen:v:2:y:2019:i:4:p:27-429:d:273200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8800/2/4/27/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8800/2/4/27/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dyson, Robert G., 2004. "Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(3), pages 631-640, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. SERAFIMOVA Desislava & LYEONOV Serhiy & VOLK Iurii & BILAN Svitlana & ARTYUKHOV Artem, 2023. "SPACE-RL Innovation Transfer Model “Science – Business”," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudio Baudino & Nicole Roberta Giuggioli & Rossella Briano & Stefano Massaglia & Cristiana Peano, 2017. "Integrated Methodologies (SWOT, TOWS, LCA) for Improving Production Chains and Environmental Sustainability of Kiwifruit and Baby Kiwi in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Sepehr Ghazinoory & Mansoureh Abdi & Mandana Azadegan-Mehr, 2010. "Swot Methodology: A State-of-the-Art Review for the Past, A Framework for the Future," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 24-48, November.
    3. Alireza Radan & Milad Latifi & Minoo Moshtaghie & Mozhgan Ahmadi & Maryam Omidi, 2017. "Determining The Sensitive Conservative Site In Kolah Ghazi National Park, Iran, In Order To Management Wildlife By Using Gis Software," Environment & Ecosystem Science (EES), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 13-15, November.
    4. Edison Navarrete & Fernando Morante-Carballo & Jairo Dueñas-Tovar & Paúl Carrión-Mero & María Jaya-Montalvo & Edgar Berrezueta, 2022. "Assessment of Geosites within a Natural Protected Area: A Case Study of Cajas National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    6. Ali Akbar Jamali & Ramin Tabatabaee & Timothy O. Randhir, 2021. "Ecotourism and socioeconomic strategies for Khansar River watershed of Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 17077-17093, November.
    7. Francesco Pagliacci & Leonardo Cei & Edi Defrancesco & Paola Gatto, 2022. "The EU Mountain Product Voluntary Quality Term as a Valorization Tool for Livestock Farms: Challenges and Opportunities in an Alpine Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Thomas J. Lampoltshammer & Valerie Albrecht & Corinna Raith, 2021. "Teaching Digital Sustainability in Higher Education from a Transdisciplinary Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Phadermrod, Boonyarat & Crowder, Richard M. & Wills, Gary B., 2019. "Importance-Performance Analysis based SWOT analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 194-203.
    10. Paúl Carrión-Mero & César Borja-Bernal & Gricelda Herrera-Franco & Fernando Morante-Carballo & María Jaya-Montalvo & Alfonso Maldonado-Zamora & Nataly Paz-Salas & Edgar Berrezueta, 2021. "Geosites and Geotourism in the Local Development of Communities of the Andes Mountains. A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Robert G. Dyson & Frances A. O’Brien & Devan B. Shah, 2021. "Soft OR and Practice: The Contribution of the Founders of Operations Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 727-738, May.
    12. Karolis Andriuškevičius & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2022. "Energy M&A Market in the Baltic States Analyzed through the Lens of Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Mingers, John & White, Leroy, 2010. "A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1147-1161, December.
    14. Heise, Heinke & Crisan, Alexandra & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2015. "The Poultry Market in Nigeria: Market Structures and Potential for Investment in the Market," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(A), pages 1-26, July.
    15. Cinzia Daraio & Léopold Simar, 2016. "Efficiency and benchmarking with directional distances: a data-driven approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(7), pages 928-944, July.
    16. Wiek, Arnim & Walter, Alexander I., 2009. "A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 360-370, August.
    17. Barak, Sasan & Javanmard, Shima, 2020. "Outsourcing modelling using a novel interval-valued fuzzy quantitative strategic planning matrix (QSPM) and multiple criteria decision-making (MCDMs)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    18. Wu, Jie & Zhao, Narisa & Yang, Tong, 2024. "Wisdom of crowds: SWOT analysis based on hybrid text mining methods using online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    19. Shao-Ping Wang & Miao-Sheng Chen & Mou-Jian Li, 2019. "Taiwan’s Marketing Strategies for Green Conferences and Exhibitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Researchers on the broader topic of the short & long term effects of Covid-19 (Novel Coronavirus), 2023. "Special Issue 2023: The Global Effects of Covid-19 to Business and Entrepreneurship," Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 0, pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjopen:v:2:y:2019:i:4:p:27-429:d:273200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.