IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i18p3456-d265173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wind Power Pricing Game Strategy under the China’s Market Trading Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Fugui Dong

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, BeiJing 102206, China)

  • Xiaohui Ding

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, BeiJing 102206, China)

  • Lei Shi

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, BeiJing 102206, China)

Abstract

Wind power has become the main power generation method in China’s clean energy power generation because of its clean and high efficiency, as well as its high power utilization rate. The research on its pricing mechanism has also become the main research focus of the wind power industry. However, wind power pricing is still at the stage of price benchmarking and no market mechanism has been introduced in China. There are still much research on the pricing mechanism of wind power for us to study. In this paper, the Kernel method is used to distribute wind power income. On the basis of the distribution result, considering the contract execution risk of wind power, cooperative game theory and the Shapley value method are used to redistribute the revenue of wind power connected to power grid. Based on the characteristics of alliance members, ANP (Analytic Network Process) was used to modify the apportioned benefits to obtain the benefit distribution method that was more in line with the interest demands of members, and an example was analyzed. The wind power pricing model based on the cooperative game established in this paper can guarantee the smooth operation of the alliance, reach the pareto optimum, and improve the activity of the wind power market. It will effectively shorten the negotiation time, and reduce the transaction cost and the uncertainty of the wind power transaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Fugui Dong & Xiaohui Ding & Lei Shi, 2019. "Wind Power Pricing Game Strategy under the China’s Market Trading Mechanism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3456-:d:265173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3456/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3456/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruck, Maira & Sandborn, Peter & Goudarzi, Navid, 2018. "A Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) model for wind farms that include Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 131-139.
    2. Fred Espen Benth & Anca Pircalabu, 2018. "A non-Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck model for pricing wind power futures," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 36-65, January.
    3. Bolinger, Mark & Wiser, Ryan, 2009. "Wind power price trends in the United States: Struggling to remain competitive in the face of strong growth," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1061-1071, March.
    4. Gersema, Gerke & Wozabal, David, 2017. "An equilibrium pricing model for wind power futures," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 64-74.
    5. Hitaj, Claudia, 2013. "Wind power development in the United States," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 394-410.
    6. Sarfati, Mahir & Hesamzadeh, Mohammad Reza & Biggar, Darryl R. & Baldick, Ross, 2018. "Probabilistic pricing of ramp service in power systems with wind and solar generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 851-862.
    7. Pircalabu, A. & Hvolby, T. & Jung, J. & Høg, E., 2017. "Joint price and volumetric risk in wind power trading: A copula approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 139-154.
    8. Anca Pircalabu & Jesper Jung, 2017. "A mixed C-vine copula model for hedging price and volumetric risk in wind power trading," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(10), pages 1583-1600, October.
    9. Fugui Dong & Lei Shi & Xiaohui Ding & Yuan Li & Yongpeng Shi, 2019. "Study on China’s Renewable Energy Policy Reform and Improved Design of Renewable Portfolio Standard," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Liu & Jinchun Chen & Chao Wang & Zhang Chen & Xinglei Liu, 2020. "Market Trading Model of Urban Energy Internet Based on Tripartite Game Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Kangyu Deng & Kai Zhang & Xinran Xue & Hui Zhou, 2019. "Design of a New Compressed Air Energy Storage System with Constant Gas Pressure and Temperature for Application in Coal Mine Roadways," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Markus Hess, 2021. "A new approach to wind power futures pricing," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(2), pages 1235-1252, December.
    2. Christensen, Troels Sønderby & Pircalabu, Anca & Høg, Esben, 2019. "A seasonal copula mixture for hedging the clean spark spread with wind power futures," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 64-80.
    3. Tranberg, Bo & Hansen, Rasmus Thrane & Catania, Leopoldo, 2020. "Managing volumetric risk of long-term power purchase agreements," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Kanamura, Takashi & Homann, Lasse & Prokopczuk, Marcel, 2021. "Pricing analysis of wind power derivatives for renewable energy risk management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    5. Takuji Matsumoto & Yuji Yamada, 2023. "Improving the Efficiency of Hedge Trading Using Higher-Order Standardized Weather Derivatives for Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Fred Espen Benth & Anca Pircalabu, 2018. "A non-Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck model for pricing wind power futures," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 36-65, January.
    7. Thomaidis, Nikolaos S. & Christodoulou, Theodoros & Santos-Alamillos, Francisco J., 2023. "Handling the risk dimensions of wind energy generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    8. Nguyen, Quynh Nga & Bedoui, Rihab & Majdoub, Najemeddine & Guesmi, Khaled & Chevallier, Julien, 2020. "Hedging and safe-haven characteristics of Gold against currencies: An investigation based on multivariate dynamic copula theory," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Li, Xiafei & Wei, Yu, 2018. "The dependence and risk spillover between crude oil market and China stock market: New evidence from a variational mode decomposition-based copula method," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 565-581.
    10. Johannes Kaufmann & Philipp Artur Kienscherf & Wolfgang Ketter, 2020. "Modeling and Managing Joint Price and Volumetric Risk for Volatile Electricity Portfolios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Yuji Yamada & Takuji Matsumoto, 2023. "Construction of Mixed Derivatives Strategy for Wind Power Producers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-26, April.
    12. Tantau Adrian & Niculescu Elena, 2022. "The role of Power Purchase Agreements for the promotion of green energy and the transition to a zero carbon economy," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 1237-1245, August.
    13. Valentine, Scott Victor, 2011. "Understanding the variability of wind power costs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3632-3639.
    14. Liu, Jicheng & Sun, Jiakang & Yuan, Hanying & Su, Yihan & Feng, Shuxian & Lu, Chaoran, 2022. "Behavior analysis of photovoltaic-storage-use value chain game evolution in blockchain environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    15. Black, Geoffrey & Holley, Donald & Solan, David & Bergloff, Michael, 2014. "Fiscal and economic impacts of state incentives for wind energy development in the Western United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 136-144.
    16. Schumacher, Kim & Yang, Zhuoxiang, 2018. "The determinants of wind energy growth in the United States: Drivers and barriers to state-level development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-13.
    17. Gianluca Orsatti & François Perruchas & Davide Consoli & Francesco Quatraro, 2020. "Public Procurement, Local Labor Markets and Green Technological Change. Evidence from US Commuting Zones," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(4), pages 711-739, April.
    18. Sen Guo & Haoran Zhao & Huiru Zhao, 2017. "A New Hybrid Wind Power Forecaster Using the Beveridge-Nelson Decomposition Method and a Relevance Vector Machine Optimized by the Ant Lion Optimizer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    19. Talaat, M. & Farahat, M.A. & Elkholy, M.H., 2019. "Renewable power integration: Experimental and simulation study to investigate the ability of integrating wave, solar and wind energies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 668-682.
    20. Lenzen, Manfred & McBain, Bonnie & Trainer, Ted & Jütte, Silke & Rey-Lescure, Olivier & Huang, Jing, 2016. "Simulating low-carbon electricity supply for Australia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 553-564.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3456-:d:265173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.