IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejlsjr/174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Writing and Metacognition: How Italian Students Represent the School Organization and the Assessment Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Moretti

    (Department of Education, Roma Tre University (Italy))

  • Arianna Giuliani
  • Arianna Lodovica Morini

Abstract

The importance of involving students in writing activities that encourage them to work on metacognitive processes is shared by educational experts (Albanese et al., 2003; Harris et al., 2010; De Simone et al., 2015). During the formative process, activities that require students to use judgment and critical thinking skills, as well as challenging them to reflect on themes close to their daily-life, are those reported to be more effective (Bruning - Horn, 2000; Boscolo - Gelati, 2007; Smith et al., 2007). The paper presents the results of a writing laboratory developed with Italian undergraduate students. The students were freshmen at the Department of Education of the Roma Tre University. The main objective was to work on the metacognitive skills of students, asking them to clarify their idea of "school organization and assessment processes in Italy", through a written paper. In addition to argumentative texts, students were asked to identify one or more illustrations to support their own judgment. The research hypothesis was that ideas that students have about scholastic organization and about assessment processes could considerably influence the way in which they approach their academic path. The products of the laboratory were systematically shared and discussed with the students. The result of the research confirms the importance of working with students on writing skills and on metacognition. These are shown to be relevant to the students' educational and professional future.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Moretti & Arianna Giuliani & Arianna Lodovica Morini, 2018. "Writing and Metacognition: How Italian Students Represent the School Organization and the Assessment Processes," European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:174
    DOI: 10.26417/ejls.v4i4.p43-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejls/article/view/5813
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://revistia.org/files/articles/ejls_v4_i3_18/Moretti.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejls.v4i4.p43-53?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.