IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejn/ejbmjr/v9y2021i3p184-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Dialogue and Working Conditions: Evidence from Perfetti Banmettelle Nigeria Limited Agbara, Ogun State, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Sholesi Olayinka Yusuf

    (Lagos State University, Nigeria)

  • Adeniyi Adeshina Olushola

    (University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa)

  • Vangeli Gamede

    (University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa)

Abstract

The increasing need for improved working conditions has made social dialogue expedient in organization. This study examined the effect of social dialogue on working conditions in the manufacturing industry. The study adopted the descriptive survey research design using Krejie and Morgan sample size determination formula, a sample size of one hundred and fifty-two (152) was derived. The copies of the questionnaire were administered with the help of some of the organization employees. One hundred and twenty-one (121) copies of the questionnaire were duly completed and thirty-one (31) were not returned. Three hypotheses were formulated and tested using inferential statistical tool. The result revealed that a significant relationship exists between negotiation, information sharing and working conditions and that they both account for 3.2% of working conditions. The study recommended that management of organizations should see social dialogue as a means of generating consensus, for improving workers’ working conditions and ultimately enhancing organizational performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sholesi Olayinka Yusuf & Adeniyi Adeshina Olushola & Vangeli Gamede, 2021. "Social Dialogue and Working Conditions: Evidence from Perfetti Banmettelle Nigeria Limited Agbara, Ogun State, Nigeria," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 9(3), pages 184-193.
    • Handle: RePEc:ejn:ejbmjr:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:184-193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/EJBM-9.3.1.1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trine P. Larsen & Mikkel Mailand, 2018. "Lifting wages and conditions of atypical employees in Denmark—the role of social partners and sectoral social dialogue," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 88-108, March.
    2. Hyman, Richard., 2010. "Social dialogue and industrial relations during the economic crisis : innovative practices or business as usual?," ILO Working Papers 994545023402676, International Labour Organization.
    3. repec:ilo:ilowps:454502 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guglielmo Meardi & Arianna Tassinari, 2022. "Crisis corporatism 2.0? The role of social dialogue in the pandemic crisis in Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(1), pages 83-100, February.
    2. William K. Roche & Paul Teague, 2015. "Antecedents of concession bargaining in the Great Recession: evidence from Ireland," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5-6), pages 434-445, November.
    3. Magdalena Bernaciak, 2013. "Social dialogue revival or ‘PR corporatism’? Negotiating anti-crisis measures in Poland and Bulgaria1," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 19(2), pages 239-251, May.
    4. Thomas Amossé & Philippe Askenazy & Martin Chevalier & Christine Erhel & Héloïse Petit & Antoine Rebérioux, 2016. "Industrial Relations and Firms’ Reactions to the Recession: A Comparative Micro-Econometric Analysis of France and Great Britain [Relations sociales et ajustements à la crise : une analyse micro-st," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-02172455, HAL.
    5. Sergio CANALDA CRIADO, 2022. "Social partner participation in the management of the COVID‐19 crisis: Tripartite social dialogue in Italy, Portugal and Spain," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 161(1), pages 149-167, March.
    6. William K. Roche & Paul Teague, 2014. "Do Recessions Transform Work and Employment? Evidence from Ireland," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(2), pages 261-285, June.
    7. Laura Carver & Virginia Doellgast, 2021. "Dualism or solidarity? Conditions for union success in regulating precarious work," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(4), pages 367-385, December.
    8. Thomas AMOSSÉ & Philippe ASKENAZY & Martin CHEVALIER & Christine ERHEL & Héloïse PETIT & Antoine REBÉRIOUX, 2019. "Industrial relations and adjustments to the crisis: A comparative micro‐statistical analysis of France and Great Britain," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(3), pages 463-487, September.
    9. Francesco Bagnardi & Valentina Petrović, 2020. "Post-socialist labour and the dual logic of collective action: workers’ unrest and trade union strategy in Fiat Automobiles Serbia," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(4), pages 415-430, November.
    10. Valentina Franca & Anja Strojin Štampar, 2021. "Board‐level employee representative independence: Myth or reality? Theoretical analysis and empirical research—the case for Slovenia," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(4), pages 569-585, December.
    11. Mailand, Mikkel & Larsen, Trine Pernille, 2018. "Hybrid work - Social protection of atypical employment in Denmark," WSI Studies 11, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    12. Helena Breth Nielsen & Kathrine Pape & Laura Stonor Gregersen & Jonas Kirchheiner-Rasmussen & Johnny Dyreborg & Anna Ilsøe & Trine Pernille Larsen & Jacob Pedersen & Anne Helene Garde, 2022. "Labor Market Affiliation of Marginal Part-Time Workers in Denmark—A Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Marjoleine Hennis, 2022. "Par le Haut Ou Par les Pays‐Bas? French and Dutch Approaches to European Social Policy Coordination Compared," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 136-151, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejn:ejbmjr:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:184-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Esra Barakli (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.