IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v76y2024ics0160791x23002178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intention to complain about unmanned aircraft system noise: A structural equation analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Brents, Robert G.
  • Winter, Scott R.
  • Gawron, Valerie
  • Keebler, Joseph R.

Abstract

Aircraft noise has long been a source of public annoyance. The public often reacts by filing noise complaints. It is expected that when unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) become more prevalent, and this new source of aviation noise is experienced by a larger cross-section of the public, reactions will include complaining about the noise UAS create. Heretofore, the literature has revealed no detailed analyses of individuals’ intention to complain about UAS noise.

Suggested Citation

  • Brents, Robert G. & Winter, Scott R. & Gawron, Valerie & Keebler, Joseph R., 2024. "Intention to complain about unmanned aircraft system noise: A structural equation analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x23002178
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X23002178
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Schreckenberg & Christin Belke & Jan Spilski, 2018. "The Development of a Multiple-Item Annoyance Scale (MIAS) for Transportation Noise Annoyance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Jurica Ivošević & Emir Ganić & Antonio Petošić & Tomislav Radišić, 2021. "Comparative UAV Noise-Impact Assessments through Survey and Noise Measurements," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Reece A. Clothier & Dominique A. Greer & Duncan G. Greer & Amisha M. Mehta, 2015. "Risk Perception and the Public Acceptance of Drones," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(6), pages 1167-1183, June.
    4. Beat Schäffer & Reto Pieren & Kurt Heutschi & Jean Marc Wunderli & Stefan Becker, 2021. "Drone Noise Emission Characteristics and Noise Effects on Humans—A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Heungsik Park & John Blenkinsopp, 2009. "Whistleblowing as Planned Behavior – A Survey of South Korean Police Officers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(4), pages 545-556, April.
    6. Jake R. Nelson & Tony H. Grubesic & Danielle Wallace & Alyssa W. Chamberlain, 2019. "The View from Above: A Survey of the Public’s Perception of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Privacy," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 83-105, January.
    7. Aydin, Burchan, 2019. "Public acceptance of drones: Knowledge, attitudes, and practice," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Pan, Jing Yu & Truong, Dothang, 2018. "Passengers’ intentions to use low-cost carriers: An extended theory of planned behavior model," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 38-48.
    9. Teemu Rantanen & Paula Lehto & Pertti Vuorinen & Kirsi Coco, 2018. "The adoption of care robots in home care—A survey on the attitudes of Finnish home care personnel," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1846-1859, May.
    10. Rao, Bharat & Gopi, Ashwin Goutham & Maione, Romana, 2016. "The societal impact of commercial drones," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 83-90.
    11. Natacha Grelat & Hélène Houot & Sophie Pujol & Jean-Pierre Levain & Jérôme Defrance & Anne-Sophie Mariet & Frédéric Mauny, 2016. "Noise Annoyance in Urban Children: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Pieter-Jan Cortoos & Bert H. J. Schreurs & Willy E. Peetermans & Karel De Witte & Gert Laekeman, 2012. "Divergent Intentions to Use Antibiotic Guidelines," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(1), pages 145-153, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Ning & Mutzner, Nico & Blanchet, Karl, 2023. "Societal acceptance of urban drones: A scoping literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Vujičić, Miroslav D. & Kennell, James & Stankov, Uglješa & Gretzel, Ulrike & Vasiljević, Đorđije A. & Morrison, Alastair M., 2022. "Keeping up with the drones! Techno-social dimensions of tourist drone videography," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Smith, Angela & Dickinson, Janet E. & Marsden, Greg & Cherrett, Tom & Oakey, Andrew & Grote, Matt, 2022. "Public acceptance of the use of drones for logistics: The state of play and moving towards more informed debate," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Komasová, Sarah & Tesař, Jakub & Soukup, Petr, 2020. "Perception of drone related risks in Czech society," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    5. Aditya Kamat & Saket Shanker & Akhilesh Barve & Kamalakanta Muduli & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Sunil Luthra, 2022. "Uncovering interrelationships between barriers to unmanned aerial vehicles in humanitarian logistics," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1134-1160, December.
    6. Sabino, Hullysses & Almeida, Rodrigo V.S. & Moraes, Lucas Baptista de & Silva, Walber Paschoal da & Guerra, Raphael & Malcher, Carlos & Passos, Diego & Passos, Fernanda G.O., 2022. "A systematic literature review on the main factors for public acceptance of drones," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Anania, Emily C. & Rice, Stephen & Pierce, Matthew & Winter, Scott R. & Capps, John & Walters, Nathan W. & Milner, Mattie N., 2019. "Public support for police drone missions depends on political affiliation and neighborhood demographics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 95-103.
    8. Osakwe, Christian Nedu & Hudik, Marek & Říha, David & Stros, Michael & Ramayah, T., 2022. "Critical factors characterizing consumers’ intentions to use drones for last-mile delivery: Does delivery risk matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Matthew Ayamga & Bedir Tekinerdogan & Ayalew Kassahun, 2021. "Exploring the Challenges Posed by Regulations for the Use of Drones in Agriculture in the African Context," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    10. Del-Real, Cristina & Díaz-Fernández, Antonio M., 2021. "Lifeguards in the sky: Examining the public acceptance of beach-rescue drones," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    11. Merkert, Rico & Bushell, James, 2020. "Managing the drone revolution: A systematic literature review into the current use of airborne drones and future strategic directions for their effective control," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. Lin Tan, Lynn Kai & Lim, Beng Chong & Park, Guihyun & Low, Kin Huat & Seng Yeo, Victor Chuan, 2021. "Public acceptance of drone applications in a highly urbanized environment," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Decker, Christopher & Chiambaretto, Paul, 2022. "Economic policy choices and trade-offs for Unmanned aircraft systems Traffic Management (UTM): Insights from Europe and the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 40-58.
    14. Antonio J. Torija & Rory K. Nicholls, 2022. "Investigation of Metrics for Assessing Human Response to Drone Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Jean Marc Wunderli & Jonas Meister & Oliver Boolakee & Kurt Heutschi, 2022. "A Method to Measure and Model Acoustic Emissions of Multicopters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Aliloo, Jamileh & Abbasi, Enayat & Karamidehkordi, Esmail & Ghanbari Parmehr, Ebadat & Canavari, Maurizio, 2024. "Dos and Don'ts of using drone technology in the crop fields," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    17. Huang, Chenyu & Chen, Yu-Che & Harris, Joseph, 2021. "Regulatory compliance and socio-demographic analyses of civil Unmanned Aircraft Systems users," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    18. Koh, Le Yi & Lee, Jia Yi & Wang, Xueqin & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Urban drone adoption: Addressing technological, privacy and task–technology fit concerns," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Henderson, Isaac Levi & Shelley, Andrew, 2023. "Examining unmanned aircraft user compliance with Civil Aviation Rules: The case of New Zealand," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 176-185.
    20. Aydin, Burchan, 2019. "Public acceptance of drones: Knowledge, attitudes, and practice," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    UAS; Drone; Noise; Intention; Complain; Factors;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x23002178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.