IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v203y2024ics0040162524001458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compliance-gaining in metaverse: A moderated parallel mediation model testing the interaction between legitimization of paltry favors technique and victim identification

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Gain
  • Park, YounJung
  • Lee, Seyoung

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and metaverse are gaining attention for revolutionizing the fundraising environment to overcome space, labor, and time shortages. However, the discussion on the use of virtual agents in the metaverse is still limited. To fill the gap, this study examined a moderated parallel mediation model, which tests the interaction between the legitimization of paltry favors (LPF) technique (i.e., “Even a penny will help.”) and victim identification (i.e., presenting personal information about an individual victim), and the mediating roles of self-image concern and guilt. Four metaverse environments were created in the fundraising context (standard message vs. LPF message × identified victim vs. unidentified victim), and an online survey was conducted with 644 American adults. The results revealed that the LPF message yielded a greater willingness to donate (WTD) than the standard message. The results also supported the mediating role of self-image concern in the relationship between the LPF message and WTD. However, guilt's mediating role was not supported. The results further revealed that victim identification moderated the direct relationship between the LPF message and WTD and the indirect relationship through self-image concern and guilt. The results provide suggestions for charitable organizations and virtual environment designers.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Gain & Park, YounJung & Lee, Seyoung, 2024. "Compliance-gaining in metaverse: A moderated parallel mediation model testing the interaction between legitimization of paltry favors technique and victim identification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:203:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524001458
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524001458
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:203:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524001458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.