IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v78y2021ics0038012121000276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Averting adverse selection: The Government of India's scheme to distribute affordable medicines

Author

Listed:
  • Srivatsa Srinivas, S.
  • Marathe, Rahul R.

Abstract

An analysis of Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Janaushadhi Parijoyana, a Government of India scheme which aims to provide quality generic medicines at affordable prices, is performed using a stylized model. There is distrust on the quality of generic medicines provided by the government and the government is taking enough measures to counter this perception. However, this distrust ensures that adverse selection is avoided wherein the poor patients become the scheme's beneficiaries and the wealthy patients don't intend to get generic medicines from this scheme. Hence, it is rational for the government to expend limited effort in creating awareness on the high quality of generic medicines so as to screen the wealthy patients from the poor patients. However, the government should exert maximum effort possible in ensuring the availability of generic medicines so that the search cost is minimized. It is surprisingly found that the government's effort required to screen the wealthy patients from the poor patients decreases with the availability of generic medicines.

Suggested Citation

  • Srivatsa Srinivas, S. & Marathe, Rahul R., 2021. "Averting adverse selection: The Government of India's scheme to distribute affordable medicines," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:78:y:2021:i:c:s0038012121000276
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012121000276
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy M. Smeeding, 2005. "Public Policy, Economic Inequality, and Poverty: The United States in Comparative Perspective," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 86(s1), pages 955-983, December.
    2. Ahmed, Syed Masud & Petzold, Max & Kabir, Zarina Nahar & Tomson, Göran, 2006. "Targeted intervention for the ultra poor in rural Bangladesh: Does it make any difference in their health-seeking behaviour?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 2899-2911, December.
    3. Roger D. Feldman & Bryan E. Dowd, 1982. "Simulation of a Health Insurance Market with Adverse Selection," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1027-1042, December.
    4. Meleddu, Marta & Pulina, Manuela & Scuderi, Raffaele, 2020. "Public and private healthcare services: What drives the choice?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Charity Gomo, 2019. "Government transfers, income inequality and poverty in South Africa," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 46(12), pages 1349-1368, November.
    6. Chernew, Michael E. & Frick, Kevin D., 1999. "The impact of managed care on the existence of equilibrium in health insurance markets," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 571-590, October.
    7. Melrose, Dianna, 1983. "Double deprivation: Public and private drug distribution from the perspective of the third world poor," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 181-186, March.
    8. Gauri Billa & Karan Thakkar & Sarita Jaiswar & Dinesh Dhodi, 2014. "A Cross-Sectional Study to Evaluate the Awareness and Attitudes of Physicians Towards Reducing the Cost of Prescription Drugs, Mumbai," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 125-137, April.
    9. Ya-Chen Tina Shih & Shu Han & Scott B. Cantor, 2005. "Impact of Generic Drug Entry on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(1), pages 71-80, January.
    10. Weiler, William C., 1985. "Estimation of the effects of adverse selection and moral hazard on income-contingent loan plans for professional and graduate students," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 313-320.
    11. Kaur, Manmeet & Jaswal, Nidhi & Saddi, Anil Kumar, 2017. "Evaluation of a women group led health communication program in Haryana, India," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 12-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lou, Jiehong & Shen, Xingchi & Niemeier, Deb, 2020. "Are stay-at-home orders more difficult to follow for low-income groups?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Allen C. Goodman & Miron Stano, 2000. "Hmos and Health Externalities: A Local Public Good Perspective," Public Finance Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 247-269, May.
    3. Komlos, John & Lauderdale, Benjamin E., 2006. "Underperformance in affluence: the remarkable relative decline in American heights in the second half of the 20th-century," Discussion Papers in Economics 1241, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    4. Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein & Mark R. Cullen, 2010. "Estimating Welfare in Insurance Markets Using Variation in Prices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 125(3), pages 877-921.
    5. Teasdale, Rebecca M. & Strasser, Mikayla & Moore, Ceily & Graham, Kara E., 2023. "Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Mijs, Jonathan Jan Benjamin, 2019. "The Paradox of Inequality: Income Inequality and Belief in Meritocracy go Hand in Hand," SocArXiv dcr9b, Center for Open Science.
    7. M. Kate Bundorf, 2010. "The Effects of Offering Health Plan Choice Within Employment‐Based Purchasing Groups," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 77(1), pages 105-127, March.
    8. Lane Kenworthy, 2010. "Rising Inequality, Public Policy, and America's Poor," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(6), pages 93-109.
    9. Ng, Irene Y.H. & Shen, Xiaoyi & Ho, Kong Weng, 2009. "Intergenerational earnings mobility in Singapore and the United States," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 110-119, March.
    10. Batata, Amber, 2004. "The effect of HMOs on fee-for-service health care expenditures: evidence from medicare revisited," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 951-963, September.
    11. Bisceglia, Michele & Padilla, Jorge & Piccolo, Salvatore & Sääskilahti, Pekka, 2023. "On the bright side of market concentration in a mixed-oligopoly healthcare industry," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. Ya-Chen Shih & Nebiyou Bekele & Ying Xu, 2007. "Use of Bayesian Net Benefit Regression Model to Examine the Impact of Generic Drug Entry on the Cost Effectiveness of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Elderly Depressed Patients," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 843-862, October.
    13. Koen Caminada & Megan C. Martin, 2011. "Differences in Anti‐Poverty Approaches in Europe and The United States: A Cross‐Atlantic Descriptive Policy Analysis," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Marius R Busemeyer & Tobias Tober, 2015. "European integration and the political economy of inequality," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(4), pages 536-557, December.
    15. Ehlert, Martin, 2011. "Shifted labor market risks? The changing economic consequences of job loss in the United States and West Germany," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Inequality and Social Integration SP I 2011-205, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    16. Janssens, Wendy & Kramer, Berber, 2016. "The social dilemma of microinsurance: Free-riding in a framed field experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 131(PB), pages 47-61.
    17. Márcio Oliveira & José Oliveira & Ana Pinto Borges & João M. Lopes, 2021. "Social networks in the non-profit sector: Social support practices," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(4), pages 523-552, December.
    18. Fabrizio Bernardi & Diederik Boertien, 2017. "Explaining Conflicting Results in Research on the Heterogeneous Effects of Parental Separation on Children’s Educational Attainment According to Social Background," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 33(2), pages 243-266, May.
    19. Salvatore Morelli & Timothy Smeeding & Jeffrey Thompson, 2014. "Post-1970 Trends in Within-Country Inequality and Poverty: Rich and Middle Income Countries," CSEF Working Papers 356, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    20. Daniel Sandoval & Mark Rank & Thomas Hirschl, 2009. "The increasing risk of poverty across the American life course," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 46(4), pages 717-737, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Health policy; Adverse selection; India;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • M38 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:78:y:2021:i:c:s0038012121000276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.