IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v92y2024icp1302-1320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering fintech innovation: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis of regulatory sandbox experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng, Yulu
  • Wu, Xiaoli

Abstract

The rapid integration of next-gen information technologies in finance has spurred FinTech innovation, posing challenges to regulation. Regulatory sandboxes are pivotal for fostering innovation. This study employs a FinTech innovation regulatory sandbox to analyze a tripartite evolutionary game involving government, FinTech enterprises, and the public. It examines strategic choices, equilibrium points, and the interplay of incentives and costs. Results highlight the pivotal role of FinTech companies. Recommendations include consistent government incentives to optimize resource allocation. In tepid engagement scenarios, FinTech companies and government entities lead the innovation adoption. In a context of significant technology spending, increasing initial willingness is crucial for optimize development.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng, Yulu & Wu, Xiaoli, 2024. "Fostering fintech innovation: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis of regulatory sandbox experiments," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1302-1320.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:92:y:2024:i:c:p:1302-1320
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.02.060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024001400
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.02.060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:92:y:2024:i:c:p:1302-1320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.