IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v247y2024ics0951832024002035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated framework of preventive maintenance and task scheduling for repairable multi-unit systems

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Wenyu
  • Gan, Jie
  • He, Shuguang
  • Li, Ting
  • He, Zhen

Abstract

Preventive maintenance and task scheduling are both crucial activities in industrial practice. Although they are interdependent and mutually influential, most existing studies typically analyze them separately. In this paper, an integrated framework of preventive maintenance planning and task scheduling is explored. On one hand, while most scholars focus on the system as a whole in scheduling studies, we further take into account the degradation and maintenance of multiple units during the task scheduling process. On the other hand, instead of only using "direct replacement" as the main maintenance method, we further consider the repairability of the unit by incorporating imperfect maintenance effects into the maintenance modeling. Additionally, the lifecycle partitioning method is proposed to analyze the maintenance groups for multiple units at the completion of scheduling tasks and their corresponding probabilities. Based on this foundation, an integrated decision model is established with the preventive maintenance threshold and scheduling task sequence as decision variables to minimize the total weighted expected completion time. Finally, a novel genetic algorithm based on hybrid encoding is proposed, and the effectiveness of integrated decision-making was validated using a practical example.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Wenyu & Gan, Jie & He, Shuguang & Li, Ting & He, Zhen, 2024. "An integrated framework of preventive maintenance and task scheduling for repairable multi-unit systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:247:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002035
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024002035
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:247:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.