IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v247y2024ics0951832024001431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bi-level corrected residual life-based maintenance for deteriorating systems under competing risks

Author

Listed:
  • Duan, Chaoqun
  • Gong, Ting
  • Yan, Liangwen
  • Li, Xinmin

Abstract

The accurate prediction of residual life in deteriorating systems is a challenging task due to uncertainties and idealized assumptions during data acquisition and model construction. To address this challenge, the paper proposes a bi-level maintenance model that incorporates a corrected residual life (CRL) approach for a deteriorating system under competing risks. Specifically, the degradation failure is modeled using a Gamma process, while the competing sudden failure is described by a proportional hazards (PH) model. To reduce inconsistencies in residual life prediction, a CRL model is presented and continuously updated with a dynamic corrective factor at each monitoring epoch. Based on the updated CRL, a bi-level maintenance model is developed, which considers both system availability and maintenance cost objectives, enabling dynamic monitoring of the system's degradation state and residual life. The optimal decision variables in the maintenance model are determined through a multi-objective optimization algorithm formulated within a semi-Markov decision process (SMDP) framework. The unique aspect of this work lies in the consideration of prediction errors in residual life and the incorporation of multi-attribute optimization for maintenance design. The proposed method is validated through a case study on light-emitting diodes, confirming its effectiveness in improving residual life prediction and optimizing maintenance decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Duan, Chaoqun & Gong, Ting & Yan, Liangwen & Li, Xinmin, 2024. "Bi-level corrected residual life-based maintenance for deteriorating systems under competing risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:247:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024001431
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024001431
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:247:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024001431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.