IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v247y2024ics0951832024001170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Functional connectivity analysis for modeling flow in infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Juanya
  • Sharma, Neetesh
  • Gardoni, Paolo

Abstract

The performance loss of infrastructure caused by hazards can disrupt economic activities, obstruct emergency responses, and be detrimental to society's well-being and recovery. Network analysis methods, including topology-based and flow-based methods, are valuable tools for infrastructure functionality assessment. Topology-based methods capture connectivity patterns of network components with relatively low computational costs. However, topology-based methods do not model the flow of resources from source facilities to consumers. On the other hand, flow-based methods are computationally intensive but can provide information on the flow performance of infrastructure by modeling the operational dynamics. This paper introduces a novel hybrid approach, Functional Connectivity Analysis (FCA), to provide comparable functionality assessment to flow-based methods with computational efficiency similar to the connectivity analysis by introducing flow-related characteristics into topological connectivity metrics. This approach is illustrated with a realistic example modeling the functionality of potable water infrastructure in Shelby County, Tennessee. Comparing the results of connectivity analysis, flow analysis, and FCA shows that FCA can provide information on functionality comparable to flow analysis with high computational efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Juanya & Sharma, Neetesh & Gardoni, Paolo, 2024. "Functional connectivity analysis for modeling flow in infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:247:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024001170
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024001170
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:247:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024001170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.