IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v246y2024ics0951832024001480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-renewable warranty cost analysis for dependent series configuration with distinct warranty periods

Author

Listed:
  • Liang, Xiaojun
  • Cui, Lirong
  • Wang, Ruiting

Abstract

A warranty product often has an interval structure, resulting in different warranty periods for each component due to their distinct degradation paths. From the manufacturer’s perspective, it is reasonable to establish appropriate warranty periods for each part to achieve cost savings. This paper introduces a dependent series configuration consisting of a main component and an auxiliary component. The failure of the main component leads to system failure, while the failure of the auxiliary component only causes a random damage to the main component. These two components follow different Wiener degradation paths, and then their first passage times (FPTs) follow disparate inverse Gaussian distributions. Assuming a pre-deterministic warranty period, W, for the main component, and ηW,0<η<1, for the auxiliary component, the warranty period can be divided into two stages: [0,ηW] and [ηW,W]. In this context, the paper proposes warranty claim policies for replacement, objective-oriented imperfect repair (OOIR), and refund. The corresponding warranty costs sustained by manufacturer and consumer within these two stages are considered. Finally, a numerical example is presented to illustrate the warranty costs sustained by manufacturer and consumer under different scenarios, as well as the total warranty costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang, Xiaojun & Cui, Lirong & Wang, Ruiting, 2024. "Non-renewable warranty cost analysis for dependent series configuration with distinct warranty periods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:246:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024001480
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024001480
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:246:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024001480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.