IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v246y2024ics0951832024000954.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AMFGP: An active learning reliability analysis method based on multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate model

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Ning
  • Li, Yan-Feng
  • Mi, Jinhua
  • Huang, Hong-Zhong

Abstract

Multi-fidelity modeling is widely available in theoretical research and engineering practice. Although high-fidelity models often necessitate substantial computational resources, they yield more accurate and reliable results. Low-fidelity models are less computationally demanding, while their results may be inaccurate or unreliable. For the reliability analysis based on complex limit state functions, a method based on active learning multi-fidelity Gaussian process model, called AMFGP, is proposed by combining surrogate model with adaptive strategy, ensuring a balance between prediction accuracy and computational cost in terms of both surrogate modeling and active learning: A dependent Gaussian process surrogate model using complete statistical characteristics is developed under the multi-fidelity framework, and the surrogate performances of different single-fidelity and multi-fidelity models with different learning functions are investigated; based on the proposed model, an adaptive strategy considering the dependence between predictions, the model correlation, and the sample density is designed, and the adaptive performance of different learning functions in different models is explored. The proposed method is validated for effectiveness and adaptability in three mathematical examples with different dimensions and demonstrated for efficiency and practicality in an engineering application to aero engine gear.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Ning & Li, Yan-Feng & Mi, Jinhua & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2024. "AMFGP: An active learning reliability analysis method based on multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:246:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024000954
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024000954
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:246:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024000954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.