IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v244y2024ics0951832023008177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design-of-Experiment (DoE) based history matching for probabilistic integrity analysis—A case study of the FE-experiment at Mont Terri

Author

Listed:
  • Buchwald, J.
  • Kolditz, O.
  • Nagel, T.

Abstract

We present an application of design-of-experiment (DoE) based history matching as an approach to reduce and investigate parameter uncertainties in finite-element models for repositories of high-level radioactive waste. We combine experimental data from the FE-experiment at the Mont Terri underground research laboratory in Switzerland with thermo-hydro-mechanical modeling using the open-source package OpenGeoSys. Uncertainties were reduced by an initial parameter screening to find heavy hitters and an experiment-matching procedure using Monte-Carlo sampling on a Gaussian proxy model to fit the error between modeling response and the experiment. Furthermore, we performed a global sensitivity analysis based on the proxy model, demonstrating the spatial impact of parameter sensitivities. Very good agreement between the experimental data and the model was found for the temperature response, whereas the pressure match hints at a significant remaining gap in the physical models and/or structure. This gap could not be filled within the scope of our contribution and needs further investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Buchwald, J. & Kolditz, O. & Nagel, T., 2024. "Design-of-Experiment (DoE) based history matching for probabilistic integrity analysis—A case study of the FE-experiment at Mont Terri," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:244:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023008177
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023008177
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109903?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tosoni, E. & Salo, A. & Govaerts, J. & Zio, E., 2019. "Comprehensiveness of scenarios in the safety assessment of nuclear waste repositories," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 561-573.
    2. Zhou, Changcong & Shi, Zhuangke & Kucherenko, Sergei & Zhao, Haodong, 2022. "A unified approach for global sensitivity analysis based on active subspace and Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Saltelli A. & Tarantola S., 2002. "On the Relative Importance of Input Factors in Mathematical Models: Safety Assessment for Nuclear Waste Disposal," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 702-709, September.
    4. Davila-Frias, Alex & Yodo, Nita & Le, Trung & Yadav, Om Prakash, 2023. "A deep neural network and Bayesian method based framework for all-terminal network reliability estimation considering degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Xiao, Ning-Cong & Yuan, Kai & Zhan, Hongyou, 2022. "System reliability analysis based on dependent Kriging predictions and parallel learning strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    6. Jiang, Zhong-ming & Feng, De-Cheng & Zhou, Hao & Tao, Wei-Feng, 2021. "A recursive dimension-reduction method for high-dimensional reliability analysis with rare failure event," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    7. Ameryan, Ala & Ghalehnovi, Mansour & Rashki, Mohsen, 2022. "AK-SESC: a novel reliability procedure based on the integration of active learning kriging and sequential space conversion method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Saveleva, Elena & Svitelman, Valentina & Blinov, Petr & Valetov, Dmitry, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis and model calibration as a part of the model development process in radioactive waste disposal safety assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Kakhaia, Salome & Zun, Pavel & Ye, Dongwei & Krzhizhanovskaya, Valeria, 2023. "Inverse uncertainty quantification of a mechanical model of arterial tissue with surrogate modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    10. Wang, Jinsheng & Xu, Guoji & Li, Yongle & Kareem, Ahsan, 2022. "AKSE: A novel adaptive Kriging method combining sampling region scheme and error-based stopping criterion for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    11. Cadini, F. & Gioletta, A. & Zio, E., 2015. "Improved metamodel-based importance sampling for the performance assessment of radioactive waste repositories," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 188-197.
    12. Qin, Zhiyuan & Naser, M.Z., 2023. "Machine learning and model driven bayesian uncertainty quantification in suspended nonstructural systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    13. Wang, Tianzhe & Chen, Zequan & Li, Guofa & He, Jialong & Liu, Chao & Du, Xuejiao, 2024. "A novel method for high-dimensional reliability analysis based on activity score and adaptive Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Guofa & Wang, Tianzhe & Chen, Zequan & He, Jialong & Wang, Xiaoye & Du, Xuejiao, 2023. "RBIK-SS: A parallel adaptive structural reliability analysis method for rare failure events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Zhan, Hongyou & Xiao, Ning-Cong & Ji, Yuxiang, 2022. "An adaptive parallel learning dependent Kriging model for small failure probability problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Wang, Tianzhe & Chen, Zequan & Li, Guofa & He, Jialong & Liu, Chao & Du, Xuejiao, 2024. "A novel method for high-dimensional reliability analysis based on activity score and adaptive Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    4. Luo, Changqi & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Keshtegar, Behrooz & Niu, Xiaopeng & Taylan, Osman, 2023. "An enhanced uniform simulation approach coupled with SVR for efficient structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Li, Peiping & Wang, Yu, 2022. "An active learning reliability analysis method using adaptive Bayesian compressive sensing and Monte Carlo simulation (ABCS-MCS)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. Pepper, Nick & Crespo, Luis & Montomoli, Francesco, 2022. "Adaptive learning for reliability analysis using Support Vector Machines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    7. Shang, Xiaobing & Su, Li & Fang, Hai & Zeng, Bowen & Zhang, Zhi, 2023. "An efficient multi-fidelity Kriging surrogate model-based method for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    8. Li, Wenxiong & Geng, Rong & Chen, Suiyin, 2024. "CSP-free adaptive Kriging surrogate model method for reliability analysis with small failure probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    9. Zhang, Yu & Dong, You & Xu, Jun, 2023. "An accelerated active learning Kriging model with the distance-based subdomain and a new stopping criterion for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Huang, Shi-Ya & Zhang, Shao-He & Liu, Lei-Lei, 2022. "A new active learning Kriging metamodel for structural system reliability analysis with multiple failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    11. Castellon, Dario Fernandez & Fenerci, Aksel & Petersen, Øyvind Wiig & Øiseth, Ole, 2023. "Full long-term buffeting analysis of suspension bridges using Gaussian process surrogate modelling and importance sampling Monte Carlo simulations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    12. Zhou, Tong & Peng, Yongbo, 2022. "Reliability analysis using adaptive Polynomial-Chaos Kriging and probability density evolution method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    13. Eric Tate, 2012. "Social vulnerability indices: a comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 63(2), pages 325-347, September.
    14. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    15. Tarantola, S. & Gatelli, D. & Mara, T.A., 2006. "Random balance designs for the estimation of first order global sensitivity indices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(6), pages 717-727.
    16. Lu, Xuefei & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2023. "Global sensitivity analysis in epidemiological modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 9-24.
    17. Dhulipala, Somayajulu L.N. & Shields, Michael D. & Chakroborty, Promit & Jiang, Wen & Spencer, Benjamin W. & Hales, Jason D. & Labouré, Vincent M. & Prince, Zachary M. & Bolisetti, Chandrakanth & Che, 2022. "Reliability estimation of an advanced nuclear fuel using coupled active learning, multifidelity modeling, and subset simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    18. Becker William & Paruolo Paolo & Saltelli Andrea, 2021. "Variable Selection in Regression Models Using Global Sensitivity Analysis," Journal of Time Series Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 187-233, July.
    19. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    20. Bakeer, Tammam, 2023. "General partial safety factor theory for the assessment of the reliability of nonlinear structural systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:244:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023008177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.