IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v243y2024ics0951832023007925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated approach to quantitative resilience assessment in process systems

Author

Listed:
  • Sun, Hao
  • Yang, Ming
  • Wang, Haiqing

Abstract

Chemical process systems are becoming more automated and complex, which leads to increased interaction and interdependence between the human and technical elements of process systems. This urges the need for updating the safety assessment method by treating “safety†as an emergent property of a system. Uncertainty comes together with complexity. To enhance system ability of dealing with uncertain disruptions, this paper proposes a quantitative resilience assessment method by modeling the failure propagation (initiated by a disruption) across the functional units of a system. The Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) is utilized to model the system operation to represent the relationship among its function units and to consider the interactions among human-technical factors. Then, a Cascading Failure Propagation Model (CFPM) is developed to quantify the fault propagation process and reflect the system functionality changes over time for resilience assessment. The proposed method is applied to a propane-feeding control system. The results show that it can help practitioners understand the process of fault propagation and risk increase, identify potential ways to design a more resilient system to respond to uncertain disruptions/attacks, and provide a real-time dynamic resilience profile to support decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Sun, Hao & Yang, Ming & Wang, Haiqing, 2024. "An integrated approach to quantitative resilience assessment in process systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023007925
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023007925
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khakzad, Nima & Khan, Faisal & Amyotte, Paul, 2011. "Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(8), pages 925-932.
    2. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E., 2016. "A review of definitions and measures of system resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 47-61.
    3. Zhu, Tiantian & Haugen, Stein & Liu, Yiliu & Yang, Xue, 2023. "A value of prediction model to estimate optimal response time to threats for accident prevention," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    4. Zinetullina, Altyngul & Yang, Ming & Khakzad, Nima & Golman, Boris & Li, Xinhong, 2021. "Quantitative resilience assessment of chemical process systems using functional resonance analysis method and Dynamic Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    5. Jing, Ke & Du, Xinru & Shen, Lixin & Tang, Liang, 2019. "Robustness of complex networks: Cascading failure mechanism by considering the characteristics of time delay and recovery strategy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    6. Kim, Yoo Chan & Yoon, Wan Chul, 2021. "Quantitative representation of the functional resonance analysis method for risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Chen, Chao & Yang, Ming & Reniers, Genserik, 2021. "A dynamic stochastic methodology for quantifying HAZMAT storage resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    8. Misuri, Alessio & Landucci, Gabriele & Cozzani, Valerio, 2021. "Assessment of risk modification due to safety barrier performance degradation in Natech events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    9. Wu, Yipeng & Chen, Zhilong & Zhao, Xudong & Gong, Huadong & Su, Xiaochao & Chen, Yicun, 2021. "Propagation model of cascading failure based on discrete dynamical system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    10. Yang, Bofan & Zhang, Lin & Zhang, Bo & Wang, Wenfeng & Zhang, Minglinag, 2021. "Resilience Metric of Equipment System: Theory, Measurement and Sensitivity Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Zhengshu & Matsubara, Yutaka & Takada, Hiroaki, 2023. "Resilience analysis and design for mobility-as-a-service based on enterprise architecture modeling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Sun, Hao & Wang, Haiqing & Yang, Ming & Reniers, Genserik, 2022. "A STAMP-based approach to quantitative resilience assessment of chemical process systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Chen, Chao & Yang, Ming & Reniers, Genserik, 2021. "A dynamic stochastic methodology for quantifying HAZMAT storage resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Yang, Bofan & Zhang, Lin & Zhang, Bo & Xiang, Yang & An, Lei & Wang, Wenfeng, 2022. "Complex equipment system resilience: Composition, measurement and element analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Eldosouky, AbdelRahman & Saad, Walid & Mandayam, Narayan, 2021. "Resilient critical infrastructure: Bayesian network analysis and contract-Based optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    6. Mottahedi, Adel & Sereshki, Farhang & Ataei, Mohammad & Qarahasanlou, Ali Nouri & Barabadi, Abbas, 2021. "Resilience estimation of critical infrastructure systems: Application of expert judgment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    7. Adnan Sarwar & Faisal Khan & Majeed Abimbola & Lesley James, 2018. "Resilience Analysis of a Remote Offshore Oil and Gas Facility for a Potential Hydrocarbon Release," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(8), pages 1601-1617, August.
    8. Kamali, Behnaz & Ziaei, Ali Naghi & Beheshti, Aliasghar & Farmani, Raziyeh, 2022. "An open-source toolbox for investigating functional resilience in sewer networks based on global resilience analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    9. Li, Jue & Wang, Hongwei, 2023. "Modeling and analyzing multiteam coordination task safety risks in socio-technical systems based on FRAM and multiplex network: Application in the construction industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    10. Chen, Zhiwei & Hong, Dongpao & Cui, Weiwei & Xue, Weikang & Wang, Yao & Zhong, Jilong, 2023. "Resilience evaluation and optimal design for weapon system of systems with dynamic reconfiguration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    11. Sun, Hao & Yang, Ming & Wang, Haiqing, 2022. "A virtual experiment for measuring system resilience: A case of chemical process systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Wu, Yipeng & Chen, Zhilong & Zhao, Xudong & Liu, Ying & Zhang, Ping & Liu, Yajiao, 2021. "Robust analysis of cascading failures in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    13. Huang, Wencheng & Yin, Dezhi & Xu, Yifei & Zhang, Rui & Xu, Minhao, 2022. "Using N-K Model to quantitatively calculate the variability in Functional Resonance Analysis Method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    14. Wu, Jingyi & Yu, Yang & Yu, Jianxing & Chang, Xueying & Xu, Lixin & Zhang, Wenhao, 2023. "A Markov resilience assessment framework for tension leg platform under mooring failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    15. Wu, Yipeng & Chen, Zhilong & Zhao, Xudong & Gong, Huadong & Su, Xiaochao & Chen, Yicun, 2021. "Propagation model of cascading failure based on discrete dynamical system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    16. Yin, Jiateng & Ren, Xianliang & Liu, Ronghui & Tang, Tao & Su, Shuai, 2022. "Quantitative analysis for resilience-based urban rail systems: A hybrid knowledge-based and data-driven approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    17. Zhang, Yanping & Cai, Baoping & Liu, Yiliu & Jiang, Qiangqiang & Li, Wenchao & Feng, Qiang & Liu, Yonghong & Liu, Guijie, 2021. "Resilience assessment approach of mechanical structure combining finite element models and dynamic Bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    18. Zhang, Haoyuan & Marsh, D. William R, 2021. "Managing infrastructure asset: Bayesian networks for inspection and maintenance decisions reasoning and planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    19. Chai, Naijie & Zhou, Wenliang & Hu, Xinlei, 2022. "Safety evaluation of urban rail transit operation considering uncertainty and risk preference: A case study in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 267-288.
    20. Fauzan Hanif Jufri & Jun-Sung Kim & Jaesung Jung, 2017. "Analysis of Determinants of the Impact and the Grid Capability to Evaluate and Improve Grid Resilience from Extreme Weather Event," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023007925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.