IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v243y2024ics0951832023007524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A dynamic Bayesian network based reliability assessment method for short-term multi-round situation awareness considering round dependencies

Author

Listed:
  • You, Qidong
  • Guo, Jianbin
  • Zeng, Shengkui
  • Che, Haiyang

Abstract

During abnormal situations, the perception, comprehension, and projection of elements related to abnormality, i.e., situation awareness (SA), is one of the critical factors to guarantee system safety, and dynamically achieved in short-term multi-round interactions. The short-term multi-round SA (STMR-SA) experiences round dependencies due to anchoring effect (AE) and confirmation bias (CB). For SA in current round, AE biases judgement of system states towards previous cognition, and CB leads to neglect of information disproving previous opinion. Therefore, AE and CB mutually promote and impede the correction of STMR-SA errors. The effects of AE and CB on STMR-SA have been verified in qualitative research but disregarded in quantitative STMR-SA reliability assessments. This paper aims to propose a novel STMR-SA reliability assessment method considering AE-caused and CB-caused round dependencies. First, a round dependency model (RDM) is developed to quantify above-mentioned round dependencies. Subsequently, STMR-SA evolution is modeled with dynamic Bayesian network, where round dependencies are represented by connections between adjacent time slices and quantified by RDM. Case study on Boeing 737-8 (MAX) accident demonstrates the effectiveness of this method. Results indicates that improvement measures including adding angle of attack (AOA) disagree warning and training enhancement, could improve the STMR-SA reliability and system safety.

Suggested Citation

  • You, Qidong & Guo, Jianbin & Zeng, Shengkui & Che, Haiyang, 2024. "A dynamic Bayesian network based reliability assessment method for short-term multi-round situation awareness considering round dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023007524
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023007524
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109838?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Man Cheol & Seong, Poong Hyun, 2006. "A computational method for probabilistic safety assessment of I&C systems and human operators in nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(5), pages 580-593.
    2. Mkrtchyan, L. & Podofillini, L. & Dang, V.N., 2015. "Bayesian belief networks for human reliability analysis: A review of applications and gaps," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-16.
    3. Atashfeshan, Nooshin & Saidi-Mehrabad, Mohammad & Razavi, Hamideh, 2021. "A novel dynamic function allocation method in human-machine systems focusing on trigger mechanism and allocation strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    4. Murray, Brian & Perera, Lokukaluge Prasad, 2021. "An AIS-based deep learning framework for regional ship behavior prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Kray, Laura J. & Galinsky, Adam D., 2003. "The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 69-81, May.
    6. Zhao, Yunfei & Smidts, Carol, 2021. "CMS-BN: A cognitive modeling and simulation environment for human performance assessment, part 2 — Application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    7. Hogarth, Robin M. & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2014. "Ambiguous incentives and the persistence of effort: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-19.
    8. Naderpour, Mohsen & Lu, Jie & Zhang, Guangquan, 2015. "An abnormal situation modeling method to assist operators in safety-critical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 33-47.
    9. Ramos, M.A. & Thieme, Christoph A. & Utne, Ingrid B. & Mosleh, A., 2020. "Human-system concurrent task analysis for maritime autonomous surface ship operation and safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    10. Ruiz-Tagle, Andres & Lopez-Droguett, Enrique & Groth, Katrina M., 2022. "A novel probabilistic approach to counterfactual reasoning in system safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    11. Stroeve, Sybert H. & Blom, Henk A.P. & Bakker, G.J. (Bert), 2013. "Contrasting safety assessments of a runway incursion scenario: Event sequence analysis versus multi-agent dynamic risk modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 133-149.
    12. Huang, Jia & You, Jian-Xin & Liu, Hu-Chen & Song, Ming-Shun, 2020. "Failure mode and effect analysis improvement: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Kim, Man Cheol & Seong, Poong Hyun, 2006. "An analytic model for situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators based on Bayesian inference," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 270-282.
    14. Wu, Bing & Yip, Tsz Leung & Yan, Xinping & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Review of techniques and challenges of human and organizational factors analysis in maritime transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    15. Lee, Hyun-Chul & Seong, Poong-Hyun, 2009. "A computational model for evaluating the effects of attention, memory, and mental models on situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1796-1805.
    16. Rebello, Sinda & Yu, Hongyang & Ma, Lin, 2018. "An integrated approach for system functional reliability assessment using Dynamic Bayesian Network and Hidden Markov Model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 124-135.
    17. Wang, Zengkai & Zeng, Shengkui & Guo, Jianbin & Che, Haiyang, 2021. "A Bayesian network for reliability assessment of man-machine phased-mission system considering the phase dependencies of human cognitive error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    18. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    19. Zhao, Yunfei & Smidts, Carol, 2021. "CMS-BN: A cognitive modeling and simulation environment for human performance assessment, part 1 — methodology," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Podofillini, Luca & Reer, Bernhard & Dang, Vinh N., 2021. "Analysis of recent operational events involving inappropriate actions: influencing factors and root causes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Mkrtchyan, L. & Podofillini, L. & Dang, V.N., 2015. "Bayesian belief networks for human reliability analysis: A review of applications and gaps," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-16.
    3. Zhao, Yunfei, 2022. "A Bayesian approach to comparing human reliability analysis methods using human performance data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    4. Wang, Zengkai & Zeng, Shengkui & Guo, Jianbin & Che, Haiyang, 2021. "A Bayesian network for reliability assessment of man-machine phased-mission system considering the phase dependencies of human cognitive error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    5. Wu, Bing & Yip, Tsz Leung & Yan, Xinping & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Review of techniques and challenges of human and organizational factors analysis in maritime transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    6. Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne & Coit, David, 2023. "Dependent failure behavior modeling for risk and reliability: A systematic and critical literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    7. Zhao, Yunfei & Smidts, Carol, 2021. "CMS-BN: A cognitive modeling and simulation environment for human performance assessment, part 1 — methodology," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    8. Atashfeshan, Nooshin & Saidi-Mehrabad, Mohammad & Razavi, Hamideh, 2021. "A novel dynamic function allocation method in human-machine systems focusing on trigger mechanism and allocation strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. Abreu, Danilo T.M.P. & Maturana, Marcos C. & Droguett, Enrique Lopez & Martins, Marcelo R., 2022. "Human reliability analysis of conventional maritime pilotage operations supported by a prospective model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. Li, Xin & Chen, Chao & Hong, Yi-du & Yang, Fu-qiang, 2023. "Exploring hazardous chemical explosion accidents with association rules and Bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    11. Catelani, Marcantonio & Ciani, Lorenzo & Guidi, Giulia & Patrizi, Gabriele, 2021. "An enhanced SHERPA (E-SHERPA) method for human reliability analysis in railway engineering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    12. Lee, Seung Jun & Kim, Man Cheol & Seong, Poong Hyun, 2008. "An analytical approach to quantitative effect estimation of operation advisory system based on human cognitive process using the Bayesian belief network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(4), pages 567-577.
    13. Zhou, Jian-Lan & Lei, Yi, 2020. "A slim integrated with empirical study and network analysis for human error assessment in the railway driving process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    14. Liu, Jianqiao & Zou, Yanhua & Wang, Wei & Zio, Enrico & Yuan, Chengwei & Wang, Taorui & Jiang, Jianjun, 2022. "A Bayesian belief network framework for nuclear power plant human reliability analysis accounting for dependencies among performance shaping factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    15. Kim, Yochan & Choi, Sun Yeong & Park, Jinkyun & Kim, Jaewhan, 2022. "Empirical study on human error probability of procedure-extraneous behaviors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    16. Patriarca, Riccardo & Ramos, Marilia & Paltrinieri, Nicola & Massaiu, Salvatore & Costantino, Francesco & Di Gravio, Giulio & Boring, Ronald Laurids, 2020. "Human reliability analysis: Exploring the intellectual structure of a research field," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    17. Fan, Shiqi & Yang, Zaili, 2024. "Accident data-driven human fatigue analysis in maritime transport using machine learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    18. Zhou, Jian-Lan & Yu, Ze-Tai & Xiao, Ren-Bin, 2022. "A large-scale group Success Likelihood Index Method to estimate human error probabilities in the railway driving process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    19. Wang, Xinjian & Xia, Guoqing & Zhao, Jian & Wang, Jin & Yang, Zaili & Loughney, Sean & Fang, Siming & Zhang, Shukai & Xing, Yongheng & Liu, Zhengjiang, 2023. "A novel method for the risk assessment of human evacuation from cruise ships in maritime transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    20. Podofillini, Luca & Reer, Bernhard & Dang, Vinh N., 2023. "A traceable process to develop Bayesian networks from scarce data and expert judgment: A human reliability analysis application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023007524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.