IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v389y2010i23p5447-5459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A quantum model of option pricing: When Black–Scholes meets Schrödinger and its semi-classical limit

Author

Listed:
  • Contreras, Mauricio
  • Pellicer, Rely
  • Villena, Marcelo
  • Ruiz, Aaron

Abstract

The Black–Scholes equation can be interpreted from the point of view of quantum mechanics, as the imaginary time Schrödinger equation of a free particle. When deviations of this state of equilibrium are considered, as a product of some market imperfection, such as: Transaction cost, asymmetric information issues, short-term volatility, extreme discontinuities, or serial correlations; the classical non-arbitrage assumption of the Black–Scholes model is violated, implying a non-risk-free portfolio. From Haven (2002) [1] we know that an arbitrage environment is a necessary condition to embedding the Black–Scholes option pricing model in a more general quantum physics setting. The aim of this paper is to propose a new Black–Scholes–Schrödinger model based on the endogenous arbitrage option pricing formulation introduced by Contreras et al. (2010) [2]. Hence, we derive a more general quantum model of option pricing, that incorporates arbitrage as an external time dependent force, which has an associated potential related to the random dynamic of the underlying asset price. This new resultant model can be interpreted as a Schrödinger equation in imaginary time for a particle of mass 1/σ2 with a wave function in an external field force generated by the arbitrage potential. As pointed out above, this new model can be seen as a more general formulation, where the perfect market equilibrium state postulated by the Black–Scholes model represent a particular case. Finally, since the Schrödinger equation is in place, we can apply semiclassical methods, of common use in theoretical physics, to find an approximate analytical solution of the Black–Scholes equation in the presence of market imperfections, as it is the case of an arbitrage bubble. Here, as a numerical illustration of the potential of this Schrödinger equation analogy, the semiclassical approximation is performed for different arbitrage bubble forms (step, linear and parabolic) and compare with the exact solution of our general quantum model of option pricing.

Suggested Citation

  • Contreras, Mauricio & Pellicer, Rely & Villena, Marcelo & Ruiz, Aaron, 2010. "A quantum model of option pricing: When Black–Scholes meets Schrödinger and its semi-classical limit," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(23), pages 5447-5459.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:389:y:2010:i:23:p:5447-5459
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2010.08.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437110007211
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2010.08.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iwata, Gyoichi, 1974. "Measurement of Conjectural Variations in Oligopoly," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 42(5), pages 947-966, September.
    2. Brennan, Michael J & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 1990. "Arbitrage in Stock Index Futures," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 63(1), pages 7-31, January.
    3. Cornell, Bradford & French, Kenneth R, 1983. "Taxes and the Pricing of Stock Index Futures," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 38(3), pages 675-694, June.
    4. Kaldor, Nicholas, 1972. "The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(328), pages 1237-1255, December.
    5. Kirill Ilinski, 1997. "Physics of Finance," Papers hep-th/9710148, arXiv.org.
    6. Matthias Otto, 2000. "Towards Non-Equilibrium Option Pricing Theory," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(03), pages 565-565.
    7. Fedotov, Sergei & Panayides, Stephanos, 2005. "Stochastic arbitrage return and its implication for option pricing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 345(1), pages 207-217.
    8. Haven, Emmanuel, 2003. "A Black-Scholes Schrödinger option price: ‘bit’ versus ‘qubit’," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 324(1), pages 201-206.
    9. Contreras, Mauricio & Montalva, Rodrigo & Pellicer, Rely & Villena, Marcelo, 2010. "Dynamic option pricing with endogenous stochastic arbitrage," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(17), pages 3552-3564.
    10. Panayides, Stephanos, 2006. "Arbitrage opportunities and their implications to derivative hedging," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 361(1), pages 289-296.
    11. Figlewski, Stephen, 1984. "Hedging Performance and Basis Risk in Stock Index Futures," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 39(3), pages 657-669, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kartono, Agus & Solekha, Siti & Sumaryada, Tony & Irmansyah,, 2021. "Foreign currency exchange rate prediction using non-linear Schrödinger equations with economic fundamental parameters," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Will Hicks, 2020. "Pseudo-Hermiticity, Martingale Processes and Non-Arbitrage Pricing," Papers 2009.00360, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    3. Denis M. Filatov & Maksim A. Vanyarkho, 2014. "An Unconventional Attempt to Tame Mandelbrot's Grey Swans," Papers 1406.5718, arXiv.org.
    4. Axel A. Araneda & Marcelo J. Villena, 2018. "Computing the CEV option pricing formula using the semiclassical approximation of path integral," Papers 1803.10376, arXiv.org.
    5. Mauricio Contreras G, 2020. "An Application of Dirac's Interaction Picture to Option Pricing," Papers 2010.06747, arXiv.org.
    6. Chowdhury, Reaz & Mahdy, M.R.C. & Alam, Tanisha Nourin & Al Quaderi, Golam Dastegir & Arifur Rahman, M., 2020. "Predicting the stock price of frontier markets using machine learning and modified Black–Scholes Option pricing model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 555(C).
    7. Bustamante, M. & Contreras, M., 2016. "Multi-asset Black–Scholes model as a variable second class constrained dynamical system," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 457(C), pages 540-572.
    8. Contreras, Mauricio & Pellicer, Rely & Villena, Marcelo, 2017. "Dynamic optimization and its relation to classical and quantum constrained systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 12-25.
    9. G., Mauricio Contreras & Peña, Juan Pablo, 2019. "The quantum dark side of the optimal control theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 515(C), pages 450-473.
    10. Mauricio Contreras G, 2020. "Endogenous Stochastic Arbitrage Bubbles and the Black--Scholes model," Papers 2009.09329, arXiv.org.
    11. Anantya Bhatnagar & Dimitri D. Vvedensky, 2022. "Quantum effects in an expanded Black–Scholes model," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(8), pages 1-12, August.
    12. Mauricio Contreras & Rely Pellicer & Daniel Santiagos & Marcelo Villena, 2015. "Calibration and simulation of arbitrage effects in a non-equilibrium quantum Black-Scholes model by using semiclassical methods," Papers 1512.05377, arXiv.org.
    13. Contreras, Mauricio & Hojman, Sergio A., 2014. "Option pricing, stochastic volatility, singular dynamics and constrained path integrals," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 391-403.
    14. Contreras, M. & Echeverría, J. & Peña, J.P. & Villena, M., 2020. "Resonance phenomena in option pricing with arbitrage," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    15. Reaz Chowdhury & M. R. C. Mahdy & Tanisha Nourin Alam & Golam Dastegir Al Quaderi, 2018. "Predicting the Stock Price of Frontier Markets Using Modified Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model and Machine Learning," Papers 1812.10619, arXiv.org.
    16. Contreras G., Mauricio, 2021. "Endogenous stochastic arbitrage bubbles and the Black–Scholes model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    17. Jena, Rajarama Mohan & Chakraverty, Snehashish & Baleanu, Dumitru, 2020. "A novel analytical technique for the solution of time-fractional Ivancevic option pricing model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 550(C).
    18. Rotundo, Giulia, 2014. "Black–Scholes–Schrödinger–Zipf–Mandelbrot model framework for improving a study of the coauthor core score," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 404(C), pages 296-301.
    19. Mauricio Contreras G. & Roberto Ortiz H, 2021. "Three little arbitrage theorems," Papers 2104.10187, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Contreras, Mauricio & Montalva, Rodrigo & Pellicer, Rely & Villena, Marcelo, 2010. "Dynamic option pricing with endogenous stochastic arbitrage," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(17), pages 3552-3564.
    2. Contreras, M. & Echeverría, J. & Peña, J.P. & Villena, M., 2020. "Resonance phenomena in option pricing with arbitrage," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    3. Mauricio Contreras G. & Roberto Ortiz H, 2021. "Three little arbitrage theorems," Papers 2104.10187, arXiv.org.
    4. Mauricio Contreras & Rely Pellicer & Daniel Santiagos & Marcelo Villena, 2015. "Calibration and simulation of arbitrage effects in a non-equilibrium quantum Black-Scholes model by using semiclassical methods," Papers 1512.05377, arXiv.org.
    5. Mauricio Contreras G, 2020. "Endogenous Stochastic Arbitrage Bubbles and the Black--Scholes model," Papers 2009.09329, arXiv.org.
    6. Chang, Charles & Lin, Emily, 2015. "Cash-futures basis and the impact of market maturity, informed trading, and expiration effects," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 197-213.
    7. Radnai, Márton, 2002. "Árazási hiba a határidős indexpiacokon [Mispricing on index futures markets]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 905-927.
    8. Contreras G., Mauricio, 2021. "Endogenous stochastic arbitrage bubbles and the Black–Scholes model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    9. Bialkowski, Jedrzej & Jakubowski, Jacek, 2008. "Stock index futures arbitrage in emerging markets: Polish evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 363-381.
    10. Chen, Chin-Ho, 2019. "Downside jump risk and the levels of futures-cash basis," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    11. Kim, Bong-Han & Chun, Sun-Eae & Min, Hong-Ghi, 2010. "Nonlinear dynamics in arbitrage of the S&P 500 index and futures: A threshold error-correction model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 566-573, March.
    12. Hakan Er & Adnan Hushmat, 2017. "The application of technical trading rules developed from spot market prices on futures market prices using CAPM," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 7(3), pages 313-353, December.
    13. Rotundo, Giulia, 2014. "Black–Scholes–Schrödinger–Zipf–Mandelbrot model framework for improving a study of the coauthor core score," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 404(C), pages 296-301.
    14. Emmanuel Haven, 2008. "Private Information and the ‘Information Function’: A Survey of Possible Uses," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 193-228, March.
    15. Haven, Emmanuel, 2008. "Elementary Quantum Mechanical Principles and Social Science: Is There a Connection?," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 5(1), pages 41-58, March.
    16. Gurmeet Singh, 2017. "Estimating Optimal Hedge Ratio and Hedging Effectiveness in the NSE Index Futures," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 6(2), pages 108-131, December.
    17. Bühler, Wolfgang & Kempf, Alexander, 1994. "DAX Index Futures: Mispricing and Arbitrage in German Markets," ZEW Discussion Papers 94-15, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Tse, Yiuman, 2001. "Index arbitrage with heterogeneous investors: A smooth transition error correction analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(10), pages 1829-1855, October.
    19. J Fedderke & Michelle Joao, 2001. "Arbitrage, Cointegration And Efficiency In Financial Markets In The Presence Of Financial Crises," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 69(3), pages 366-384, September.
    20. Panayides, Stephanos, 2006. "Arbitrage opportunities and their implications to derivative hedging," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 361(1), pages 289-296.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:389:y:2010:i:23:p:5447-5459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.