IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v91y2024ics0301420724002587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who are root hazards? A research on optimization of safety training management in coal mine enterprises from data-driven perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Fa, Ziwei
  • Yan, Ke
  • Qiu, Zunxiang
  • Zhang, Yueqian
  • Liu, Quanlong
  • Li, Xinchun

Abstract

As a significant measure of behavioral risk control, the quality and efficiency of safety training and education can directly affect employees' unsafe behavioral patterns. Therefore, in order to scientifically improve the effectiveness of safety training management, this paper adopts the idea of data-driven research paradigm. Firstly, the accident causation model in the coal mine industry is redefined centered on unsafe behaviors and training loopholes as a starting point. Then the decision tree and key phrase extraction algorithm are applied respectively to mine 715 pieces of employees' violation data and safety training data in coal mine enterprises and the crucial characteristics of employees’ attributes and safety training mode along with the specific content of unsafe behaviors, are revealed in turn. Finally, the data information is transformed into decision information from three aspects which are specifying the training audience, improving the training mode and refining the training content, so as to realize the overall optimization of safety training management in coal mine enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Fa, Ziwei & Yan, Ke & Qiu, Zunxiang & Zhang, Yueqian & Liu, Quanlong & Li, Xinchun, 2024. "Who are root hazards? A research on optimization of safety training management in coal mine enterprises from data-driven perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724002587
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724002587
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104891?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724002587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.