IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v96y2020ics030504831831404x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operational decision making for a referral coordination alliance- When should patients be referred and where should they be referred to?

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Na
  • Pan, Jie
  • Xie, Xiaoqing

Abstract

In China, due to lack of clear regulation on care pathway of patients, it is commonly observed that the system experiences substantial utilization imbalance. One way to address this challenge is through creating healthcare alliances. Among the alliance, patients can be referred from high utilized hospitals to low utilized ones for services that can be provided in both types of hospitals with similar service qualities. Such an alliance system, usually includes one upper level high utilized hospital (ULH) (e.g. a Comprehensive Hospital) and several lower level hospital (LLH) that are low utilized (e.g. Community Hospitals). The alliance hopes to reduce waiting time of the system, especially the waiting time in the high utilized hospital. As a result, the utilization of the low utilized hospitals will be improved. Nevertheless, it remains unclear how to control the referral decision process. In this paper, we investigate when patients at the ULH will need to be referred to the LLH and to which LLH they should be referred to. Firstly, we focus our attention on an easy-to-implement threshold policy for the ULH for making the decision whether to referral patients. Then, we analyze five different selection strategies (Random Transfer, Maximum Number of Beds Available, Minimum Number of Beds Available, Maximum Available Beds Rate Status, and Minimum Available Beds Rate Status) to determine the LLH to which the patient is referred to. Simulation experiments are performed to make these analyses. Opposite to the intuition that it is best to send patients to the LLH with the most available beds, the results show that sending patients to the LLH with the lowest available bed rate (Minimum Available Beds Rate Status) is the best strategy. This is because that the ULH's waiting time is more important in the objective, sending patients to an LLH that its current available resources are more likely to be occupied by its own normal patients later, will help improve the overall probability that the ULH successfully refer patients out in the long run. Secondly, we also developed a PSO-OCBA method which integrates the idea from Optimal Computing Budget Allocation (OCBA) into the searching Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm for generating best control threshold. We find that if we can adaptively achieve the optimal K with the different selection strategies, the difference of the performance between the five strategies will be highly reduced. Our research is the first work that applies system engineering to the real-time referral decision problem between one ULH and several LLHs. It provides a novel perspective of patient referral control studies in the coordination alliance operation literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Na & Pan, Jie & Xie, Xiaoqing, 2020. "Operational decision making for a referral coordination alliance- When should patients be referred and where should they be referred to?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:96:y:2020:i:c:s030504831831404x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2019.06.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504831831404X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2019.06.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marie Matta & Sarah Patterson, 2007. "Evaluating multiple performance measures across several dimensions at a multi-facility outpatient center," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 173-194, June.
    2. Marinakis, Yannis & Migdalas, Athanasios & Sifaleras, Angelo, 2017. "A hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization – Variable Neighborhood Search algorithm for Constrained Shortest Path problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 819-834.
    3. Yunzhe Qiu & Jie Song & Zekun Liu, 2016. "A simulation optimisation on the hierarchical health care delivery system patient flow based on multi-fidelity models," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(21), pages 6478-6493, November.
    4. Satyajith Amaran & Nikolaos V. Sahinidis & Bikram Sharda & Scott J. Bury, 2016. "Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 351-380, May.
    5. Na Li & Nan Kong & Quanlin Li & Zhibin Jiang, 2017. "Evaluation of reverse referral partnership in a tiered hospital system – A queuing-based approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(19), pages 5647-5663, October.
    6. J. G. Dai & Pengyi Shi, 2017. "A Two-Time-Scale Approach to Time-Varying Queues in Hospital Inpatient Flow Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 514-536, April.
    7. Lobo, Benjamin J. & Brown, Donald E. & Gerber, Matthew S. & Grazaitis, Peter J., 2018. "A transient stochastic simulation–optimization model for operational fuel planning in-theater," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 637-652.
    8. Chang, Kuo-Hao & Kuo, Po-Yi, 2018. "An efficient simulation optimization method for the generalized redundancy allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1094-1101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hao, Yuchen & Liu, Chuang & Zhao, Lugang & Liu, Weibo, 2023. "A dual-clustering algorithm for a robust medical grid partition problem considering patient referral," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Li, Zhong-Ping & Chang, Aichih (Jasmine) & Zou, Zongbao, 2023. "Design mechanism to coordinate a hierarchical healthcare system: Patient subsidy vs. capacity investment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Cao, Xuejing & Rajagopalan, Sampath & Tong, Chunyang, 2024. "Impact of vertical integration in a referral-based healthcare system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    4. Hesham Ali Behary Aboelkhir & Adel Elomri & Tarek Y. ElMekkawy & Laoucine Kerbache & Mohamed S. Elakkad & Abdulla Al-Ansari & Omar M. Aboumarzouk & Abdelfatteh El Omri, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Decision Support Systems for Healthcare Referral Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Li, Zhong-Ping & Wang, Jian-Jun, 2021. "Effects of healthcare quality and reimbursement rate in a hospital association," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Niu, Baozhuang & Xu, Haotao & Dai, Zhipeng, 2022. "Check Only Once? Health Information Exchange between Competing Private Hospitals," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Na & Zhang, Yue & Teng, De & Kong, Nan, 2021. "Pareto optimization for control agreement in patient referral coordination," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Noordhoek, Marije & Dullaert, Wout & Lai, David S.W. & de Leeuw, Sander, 2018. "A simulation–optimization approach for a service-constrained multi-echelon distribution network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 292-311.
    3. Vahid Baradaran & Amir Hossein Hosseinian, 2020. "A bi-objective model for redundancy allocation problem in designing server farms: mathematical formulation and solution approaches," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(5), pages 935-952, October.
    4. Huo, Jinbiao & Liu, Chengqi & Chen, Jingxu & Meng, Qiang & Wang, Jian & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2023. "Simulation-based dynamic origin–destination matrix estimation on freeways: A Bayesian optimization approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Chang, Kuo-Hao & Kuo, Po-Yi, 2018. "An efficient simulation optimization method for the generalized redundancy allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1094-1101.
    6. Ling, Chunyan & Yang, Lechang & Feng, Kaixuan & Kuo, Way, 2023. "Survival signature based robust redundancy allocation under imprecise probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    7. David J. Eckman & Shane G. Henderson & Sara Shashaani, 2023. "Diagnostic Tools for Evaluating and Comparing Simulation-Optimization Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 350-367, March.
    8. Lam, Chiou-Peng & Masek, Martin & Kelly, Luke & Papasimeon, Michael & Benke, Lyndon, 2019. "A simheuristic approach for evolving agent behaviour in the exploration for novel combat tactics," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    9. V. Kungurtsev & F. Rinaldi, 2021. "A zeroth order method for stochastic weakly convex optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 731-753, December.
    10. Bohui Liang & Ayten Turkcan & Mehmet Erkan Ceyhan & Keith Stuart, 2015. "Improvement of chemotherapy patient flow and scheduling in an outpatient oncology clinic," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(24), pages 7177-7190, December.
    11. Mielczarek, Bożena, 2014. "Simulation modelling for contracting hospital emergency services at the regional level," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 287-299.
    12. Yang, Nan & Shen, Liyin & Shu, Tianheng & Liao, Shiju & Peng, Yi & Wang, Jinhuan, 2021. "An integrative method for analyzing spatial accessibility in the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    13. Wang, LiGuo & Ringwood, John V., 2021. "Control-informed ballast and geometric optimisation of a three-body hinge-barge wave energy converter using two-layer optimisation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1159-1170.
    14. Laura Calvet & Rocio de la Torre & Anita Goyal & Mage Marmol & Angel A. Juan, 2020. "Modern Optimization and Simulation Methods in Managerial and Business Economics: A Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, July.
    15. Tahir Ekin & Stephen Walker & Paul Damien, 2023. "Augmented simulation methods for discrete stochastic optimization with recourse," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 771-793, January.
    16. Zhou, Cuihua & Lan, Yanfei & Li, Weifeng & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2022. "Medicare policies in a two-Tier healthcare system with overtreatment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Hao, Yuchen & Liu, Chuang & Zhao, Lugang & Liu, Weibo, 2023. "A dual-clustering algorithm for a robust medical grid partition problem considering patient referral," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    18. Shen, Zuo-Jun Max & Xie, Jingui & Zheng, Zhichao & Zhou, Han, 2023. "Dynamic scheduling with uncertain job types," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1047-1060.
    19. Zhang, Hanxiao & Sun, Muxia & Li, Yan-Fu, 2022. "Reliability–redundancy allocation problem in multi-state flow network: Minimal cut-based approximation scheme," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    20. Romero-Silva, Rodrigo & de Leeuw, Sander, 2021. "Learning from the past to shape the future: A comprehensive text mining analysis of OR/MS reviews," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:96:y:2020:i:c:s030504831831404x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.