IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijocip/v42y2023ics1874548223000306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of 5G on cyber-physical risks for interdependent connected smart critical infrastructure systems

Author

Listed:
  • Vargas, Paola
  • Tien, Iris

Abstract

5 G technology promises a wide range of benefits for critical infrastructure (CI), including improved reliability, increased efficiency, cost savings, and increased worker safety. However, it also brings many new risks that CI owners and operators must be prepared for to facilitate effective risk mitigation and response. These risks, however, have not been systematically assessed for CI systems. This paper investigates how the cyber-physical risk landscape will be impacted by 5 G for four major CI sectors in detail: smart transportation, smart water, smart power, and smart oil and gas networks. Compared to prior work only examining a single CI network, the authors present a comprehensive assessment of the types of threats that these sectors can expect based on past incidents, the new vulnerabilities introduced by 5 G and existing vulnerabilities exacerbated by the introduction of more connected devices, along with mitigation recommendations for each risk. Risks associated with the rollout of and transition to 5 G, risks from 5 G network disruptions, cyberattack risks, and privacy risks are included. While each of the sectors has a unique risk profile, general themes also emerged across multiple CI networks. Notably, there will be an increased number of threat vectors from smart devices reliant on the telecommunications network to provide monitoring and control of infrastructure services. Because many of these devices are accessible by the public, the risk of social engineering attacks and vulnerability to physical hacking are exacerbated. Successful risk mitigation requires collaboration among CI's many stakeholders to implement security measures at the interfaces between connected devices to limit the access to assets in case one security measure is successfully bypassed. Due to the increased interdependencies between CI networks, operators must create backup plans to keep the most essential services running on a smaller bandwidth in case of a 5 G outage or similar failure. As 5 G capabilities continue to develop and the risk landscape evolves, ongoing research is needed and CI owners and operators should be prepared to update security measures to remain ahead of identified risks and threats.

Suggested Citation

  • Vargas, Paola & Tien, Iris, 2023. "Impacts of 5G on cyber-physical risks for interdependent connected smart critical infrastructure systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijocip:v:42:y:2023:i:c:s1874548223000306
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2023.100617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548223000306
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijcip.2023.100617?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suo, Weilan & Wang, Lin & Li, Jianping, 2021. "Probabilistic risk assessment for interdependent critical infrastructures: A scenario-driven dynamic stochastic model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    2. Gianluca Pescaroli & David Alexander, 2016. "Critical infrastructure, panarchies and the vulnerability paths of cascading disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(1), pages 175-192, May.
    3. Azza E Ahmed & Jacob Heldenbrand & Yan Asmann & Faisal M Fadlelmola & Daniel S Katz & Katherine Kendig & Matthew C Kendzior & Tiffany Li & Yingxue Ren & Elliott Rodriguez & Matthew R Weber & Justin M , 2019. "Managing genomic variant calling workflows with Swift/T," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Rajagopal, 2019. "Managing Brands in Competitive Marketplaces," Springer Books, in: Competitive Branding Strategies, chapter 0, pages 3-37, Springer.
    5. Jena, Prasanta Kumar & Ghosh, Subhojit & Koley, Ebha, 2021. "Design of a coordinated cyber-physical attack in IoT based smart grid under limited intruder accessibility," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    6. Kimani, Kenneth & Oduol, Vitalice & Langat, Kibet, 2019. "Cyber security challenges for IoT-based smart grid networks," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 36-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Slapničar, Sergeja & Axelsen, Micheal & Bongiovanni, Ivano & Stockdale, David, 2023. "A pathway model to five lines of accountability in cybersecurity governance," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    2. Danielsson, Erna & Nyhlén, Jon & Olausson, Pär M., 2020. "Strategic planning for power shortages," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Lin Wang & Yuping Xing, 2022. "Risk Assessment of a Coupled Natural Gas and Electricity Market Considering Dual Interactions: A System Dynamics Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Liu, Zhichen & Li, Ying & Zhang, Zhaoyi & Yu, Wenbo, 2022. "A new evacuation accessibility analysis approach based on spatial information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Shahid Mahmood & Moneeb Gohar & Jin-Ghoo Choi & Seok-Joo Koh & Hani Alquhayz & Murad Khan, 2021. "Digital Certificate Verification Scheme for Smart Grid using Fog Computing (FONICA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Gianluca Pescaroli & David Alexander, 2018. "Understanding Compound, Interconnected, Interacting, and Cascading Risks: A Holistic Framework," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2245-2257, November.
    7. Olga Bucovetchi & Alexandru Georgescu & Dorel Badea & Radu D. Stanciu, 2019. "Agent-Based Modeling (ABM): Support for Emphasizing the Air Transport Infrastructure Dependence of Space Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Lilli, Giordano & Sanavia, Matteo & Oboe, Roberto & Vianello, Chiara & Manzolaro, Mattia & De Ruvo, Pasquale Luca & Andrighetto, Alberto, 2024. "A semi-quantitative risk assessment of remote handling operations on the SPES Front-End based on HAZOP-LOPA," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Simi Goyol & Chaminda Pathirage, 2018. "Farmers Perceptions of Climate Change Related Events in Shendam and Riyom, Nigeria," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Steen, Riana & Ferreira, Pedro, 2020. "Resilient flood-risk management at the municipal level through the lens of the Functional Resonance Analysis Model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    11. Rita Der Sarkissian & Chadi Abdallah & Jean-Marc Zaninetti & Sara Najem, 2020. "Modelling intra-dependencies to assess road network resilience to natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 121-137, August.
    12. Hiroki Noguchi & Takuma Nishizawa & Masaaki Fuse, 2021. "A method to characterize the social cascading damage processes of disasters using media information," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(1), pages 231-247, May.
    13. Feng, Jian Rui & Yu, Guanghui & Zhao, Mengke & Zhang, Jiaqing & Lu, Shouxiang, 2022. "Dynamic risk assessment framework for industrial systems based on accidents chain theory: The case study of fire and explosion risk of UHV converter transformer," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    14. Caetano, Henrique O. & N., Luiz Desuó & Fogliatto, Matheus S.S. & Maciel, Carlos D., 2024. "Resilience assessment of critical infrastructures using dynamic Bayesian networks and evidence propagation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    15. Kevin Patrick Keenan, 2019. "Creating spaces of public insecurity in times of terror: The implications of code/space for urban vulnerability analyses," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(1), pages 81-101, February.
    16. Bellè, Andrea & Zeng, Zhiguo & Duval, Carole & Sango, Marc & Barros, Anne, 2022. "Modeling and vulnerability analysis of interdependent railway and power networks: Application to British test systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    17. Asad Asadzadeh & Amir Reza Khavarian-Garmsir & Ayyoob Sharifi & Pourya Salehi & Theo Kötter, 2022. "Transformative Resilience: An Overview of Its Structure, Evolution, and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Ben Krishna & Satish Krishnan & M. P. Sebastian, 2023. "Examining the Relationship between National Cybersecurity Commitment, Culture, and Digital Payment Usage: An Institutional Trust Theory Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1713-1741, October.
    19. Caroline Hachem-Vermette & Somil Yadav, 2023. "Impact of Power Interruption on Buildings and Neighborhoods and Potential Technical and Design Adaptation Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    20. Nicolas Scholze & Nils Riach & Rüdiger Glaser, 2020. "Assessing Climate Change in the Trinational Upper Rhine Region: How Can We Operationalize Vulnerability Using an Indicator-Based, Meso-Scale Approach?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijocip:v:42:y:2023:i:c:s1874548223000306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-critical-infrastructure-protection .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.