IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecb/ecbmbu/201800062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the G-SIB framework incentivise window-dressing behaviour? Evidence of G-SIBs and reporting banks

Author

Listed:
  • Behn, Markus
  • Parisi, Laura
  • Wedow, Michael
  • Mangiante, Giacomo

Abstract

This article evaluates whether the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) framework has incentivised banks to adopt window-dressing behaviour, and whether their engagement in capital market activities has facilitated it. Window-dressing behaviour could have detrimental effects on financial stability, for at least two reasons: first, it may imply an underestimation of banks’ overall systemic importance and a distortion of the relative ranking in favour of banks that engage in more window-dressing behaviour; second, overall market functioning may be adversely affected if banks reduce the provision of certain services towards the end of the year. The evidence presented in this article suggests that both G-SIBs and banks with reporting obligations have reduced their overall risk score and some of their individual risk indicators at the end of a calendar year, both in absolute terms and relative to the other banks in the sample. The results also indicate that year-end reductions in capital market activities are a main driver of the observed window-dressing behaviour. JEL Classification: G21, G28, G38

Suggested Citation

  • Behn, Markus & Parisi, Laura & Wedow, Michael & Mangiante, Giacomo, 2018. "Does the G-SIB framework incentivise window-dressing behaviour? Evidence of G-SIBs and reporting banks," Macroprudential Bulletin, European Central Bank, vol. 6.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecb:ecbmbu:2018:0006:2
    Note: 2203070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu//pub/financial-stability/macroprudential-bulletin/html/ecb.mpbu201810_02.en.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    G-SIBs; systemic risk; window dressing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecb:ecbmbu:2018:0006:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Official Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/emieude.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.