IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v18y2013i02p271-307_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meeting defined benefit pension obligations: measurement, risk and flight paths

Author

Listed:
  • Hatchett, J.
  • Hurd, M.
  • Clacher, I.

Abstract

The UK defined benefit pension scheme landscape has changed dramatically over the last few decades. During this period of change, conflicting views regarding the measurement of both assets and liabilities has made communication challenging. In turn, this has led to an under appreciation of risk and often suboptimal decision making. This paper seeks to draw together a variety of contrasting views to provide a coherent framework for stakeholders to meet pension scheme obligations over time. The proposed framework encourages agreement between both scheme sponsors and trustees towards a common target through a well articulated plan or “flight path”. In addition, the proposed flight path structure provides a common basis underpinning the measurement of both pension obligations and the risks inherent in any plan to meet those obligations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hatchett, J. & Hurd, M. & Clacher, I., 2013. "Meeting defined benefit pension obligations: measurement, risk and flight paths," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 271-307, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:18:y:2013:i:02:p:271-307_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321712000335/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:18:y:2013:i:02:p:271-307_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.