IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v68y2023i7id80-2022-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Therapeutic potential of natural products and antibiotics against bovine mastitis pathogen of cows and buffaloes

Author

Listed:
  • W Khan

    (Centre for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat, Pakistan)

  • SA Khan

    (Centre for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat, Pakistan)

  • FA Khan

    (Centre for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat, Pakistan)

  • S Khan

    (Centre for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat, Pakistan)

  • I Ullah

    (Centre for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat, Pakistan)

  • A Shah

    (Centre for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat, Pakistan)

  • I Uddin

    (Veterinary Research and Disease Investigation Center, Balogram, Swat, Pakistan)

  • S Khan

    (Veterinary Research and Disease Investigation Center, Balogram, Swat, Pakistan)

  • H Khan

    (Centre for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat, Pakistan)

  • MN Uddin

    (Centre for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat, Pakistan)

  • F Akbar

    (Centre for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat, Pakistan)

  • N Qayum

    (Centre for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat, Pakistan)

Abstract

The present study aims to evaluate the prevalence and antimicrobial sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus associated with bovine mastitis to selected antibiotics and plant extracts. In the current study, 140 milk samples were collected from cows and buffaloes. Among the 140 samples, 93 samples were positive for sub-clinical mastitis based on the California Mastitis Test (CMT). Out of the total positive samples, 45 were confirmed for S. aureus on a Mannitol salt agar media. The antimicrobial susceptibility test revealed that 44.82% of the isolates were resistant to cefoxitin (oxacillin) confirming methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) with a higher percentage (51.61%) in the buffalo than in the cow samples. Furthermore, the PCR assay confirmed the presence of the mecA gene in all the MRSA isolates. Among the seven tested antibiotics, sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim showed high efficacy (71.1%) against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates (MSSA). Oxytetracycline and sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim showed 20% efficacy against MRSA followed by enrofloxacin (10%). On the other hand, the tested samples from Pistacia chinensis revealed that the ethyl acetate extract of bark showed a maximum zone of inhibition of 21.3 mm against MSSA and MRSA isolates at 3 000 µg/disc. Moreover, the methanol extract of Cotoneaster microphyllus formed a 12.3 mm and 9.1 mm zone of inhibition against the MSSA and MRSA isolates, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • W Khan & SA Khan & FA Khan & S Khan & I Ullah & A Shah & I Uddin & S Khan & H Khan & MN Uddin & F Akbar & N Qayum, 2023. "Therapeutic potential of natural products and antibiotics against bovine mastitis pathogen of cows and buffaloes," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(7), pages 271-280.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:68:y:2023:i:7:id:80-2022-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/80/2022-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/80/2022-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/80/2022-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/80/2022-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:68:y:2023:i:7:id:80-2022-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.